Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Doonesbury vs. Starbucks gun 'activists.' Day five.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 08:44 AM
Original message
Doonesbury vs. Starbucks gun 'activists.' Day five.
Edited on Fri Mar-26-10 08:45 AM by onehandle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes! That wild west was a haven to gun slingers
Except that there were towns that required firearms to be given up when they entered the town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ah. Back when things were 'civilized.'
Cue a gungeoneer to fake a tangent subject outrage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Yeah...
and many towns back then were heavily segregated. That was good for law and order too.

Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. If nutjobs want to drink that swill, they can have it.
Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cowman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It just
pissed you off that Starbucks hasn't caved to you gun grabbers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. When did DU turn so authoritarian rightwing?
They are all over this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. When did supporting civil rights become "authoritarian rightwing"?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tburnsten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. AikoAiko he was responding to someone else
who clearly is one of the fools that think Starbucks has no right to run their business any way they want, and no right to respect the rights of others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-26-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. good for starbux
for supporting civil rights, despite the veiled penis canard ridicule from doonesbury et al

if only they could make GOOD COFFEE lol

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. His satire is certainly puncturing some sacred cows...
His satire is certainly puncturing some sacred cows... :) Too funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think its the other way around, Starbucks slaughered the anti-gun sacred cow of...

...not allowing open carry and the whining has begun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-27-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Brady Campaign says "jump"
Edited on Sat Mar-27-10 01:14 PM by benEzra
and the MSM says "on who, and how hard?"

It's interesting to see how the Brady Campaign PR attack against Starbucks has played out in the corporate media. The vast majority of retail establishments have exactly the same policy as Starbucks, so anyone specifically slamming Starbucks for it is merely following the Brady Campaign's talking points.

Starbucks has told the Brady Campaign they want to stay out of the controversy and let state governments set the carry rules (which they do), and that is driving the Bradyites nuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC