Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oldie but goodie from archives: Thoughts on confronting your beliefs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jazzhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 08:57 PM
Original message
Oldie but goodie from archives: Thoughts on confronting your beliefs
Browsing the archives, I stumbled across the following little gem and thought I'd repost the conversion experience of another member:



NightRainFalls (71 posts) Fri Jul-01-05 07:12 PM
Original message
Thoughts on Confronting Your Beliefs (long)

Dear Reader,

I am sure you agree with me, in struggling to understand our world, we all create myths. Many of these myths embody stereotypes that we have found to be true. I am also sure that you will agree with me, when we encounter someone with a different mythos than ours, it can be extremely difficult to understand how they can think what they think. Sometimes, we have a rare opportunity to expose the flaws in our own personal mythos. Sometimes we have the ability to examine our own stereotypes and learn that though they are often true, they are only half true. This is a reflection on one of those occasions.

When I was a youngster I learned to shoot in Boy Scouts. To me, firearms were arcane diversions that were not really relevant to civilized world. During my childhood, war was something that happened far away, in less civilized parts of the world. I was of the opinion that there was no need to own firearms, beyond the skeet gun or .22 used for sport. I might have allowed room for a twelve gauge for deer hunting, but a bow seemed more sportsmanlike.

When I was in college I was shocked to discover that my roommate kept a gun for self defense. I even tried to talk him out of it.

I also voted for Bill Clinton twice, and thought the AWB was a great idea, because who needs fully automatic cop killing military rifles to hunt with. I was certainly against concealed carry, and I was convinced that only red necks carried guns for anything other than sporting purposes. To me, most legitimate gun owners were either hunters or sportsmen. The Second Amendment clearly only applied to militias.

Then two things happened. First I read the Federalist Papers, and an early version of Blackstone commentaries on the Constitution. I began to realize that the Second Amendment was meant to do much more than my teachers and college professors had let on. Then, my old college friend showed me a pre-ban AK-47 clone. I asked if it was legal to own it, he said yes. I asked why? He took me to the range and I shot it. I was surprised to discover it wasn’t a machine gun at all. You couldn’t really shoot it quickly or accurately from the hip. Indeed, almost nothing the press had said or implied about the gun was true. It was not even that powerful.

Something had started to happen. I began to realize that what I knew was only an illusion. The first cracks in the walls of my mythos expanded on another trip to my friend’s range. Two men were practicing combat hand gunnery on the plates course. When they where finished I naively asked them if they where cops. Actually they were not. One was a surgeon, the other a pediatrician. Prior to that moment I had been sure that only police and rednecks carried guns for self defense, and only police needed them.

I would later learn that this stereotype is deeply flawed, but seemingly self evident. I am sure that many of you nodded your heads in agreement when you read it. It is your stereotype also. Here is how so many people have come to believe it. The redneck, cracker, hillbilly (whatever name you want to use) is usually a braggart. If he or she has a gun everyone knows about it. When a member of the upper-class carries a gun, he or she carries it in an ankle holsters above Italian leather shoes, or tucked under a hand tailored suit jacket. To maintain a tactical advantage, the intelligent gun owner carries secretly. No one knows about them, but everyone knows about the red neck.

When I attended my first bull’s eye competition I was shocked to discover that many of the participants were women. In the patronizing tone anti-gunners so often use, I asked why women would carry guns, didn’t they know women suffer the tremendously from gun violence? They did.

One woman took me aside and patiently explained to me that she understood were I was coming from. When she first got married she didn’t want her husband to have a gun in the house. Now she was teaching her daughter to shoot. She told me that women could become victims at any time, and that for her a gun was a way to fight back. She was proud that she could fight back with such deadly accuracy. She showed me the true meaning of gun control when she shot a magazine of .45 caliber rounds into a single ragged hole in a target 15 yards away.

As I learned more and more about guns and gun owners, I learned that guns are not some great evil to be feared. They are remarkably refined tools that can be used for good as well. A great many people, liberal and conservative, upper class and redneck, male and female carry guns every day. Handled properly by responsible adults, guns are completely safe. Most importantly, a lot of what the anti-gun extremists say about guns is ignorant, untrue, or misrepresentative. I know this because I was once one of them.


Sincerely,

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. A thoughtful reflection. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You are welcome.
I had a somewhat different conversion experience. When I first starting posting here I mentioned that my youth was quite turbulent as I was involved in activity outside of the law. Like my peers in the trade, I carried a semi-automatic pistol -- though I am extremely pleased that I never shot anyone with it. (or even at anyone) While I never had the occasion to pull it, I was once on the receiving end of gunfire and narrowly escaped serious injury or death. (just took a ricochet and frag) After I got help and cleaned up my act I never considered owning a firearm because I associated guns with my previous lifestyle. A personally threatening situation caused me to change my mind, and I began target shooting sometime around 2002.

The experience of the DU'er that I posted leads me to wonder if there are members of the pro-RKBA membership here who were at one time unsympathetic to gun ownership. If so ---- please post your experience!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. i was unsympathetic
i grew up adjacent to the campus of a liberal arts university, in an east coast city. NOBODY had guns, and the idea that somebody should carry a gun (apart from cops, etc.) was simply ludicrous.

i started working as a firefighter and cop, and started studying the subject and changed my mind, both from a POLICY standpoint and from a constitutional standpoint.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. As for me,
Edited on Sat May-01-10 11:18 PM by WheelWalker
I recognize that I can do as much harm, and as much good, with my tongue, or my thoughts, as I can with with with any tool in my personal kit. There is no inevitability that any tool I carry will express its utility.

ON EDIT: "with with with?" I sound like Max Headroom...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Something worth adding on this subject

When criminolgists (read experts) change their position on gun control this occurs overwhelmingly in favor of pro gun rights. Pretty tough for the antis to swallow the fact that the more that the experts know about gun "control" the less they support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC