Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gang violence and the mayor's feeble and futile gun laws (Portland, Or.)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 04:47 AM
Original message
Gang violence and the mayor's feeble and futile gun laws (Portland, Or.)
In response to the escalation in gang-related shootings in Portland, Mayor Sam Adams is proposing actions that are typical of those with liberal leanings. Rather than blaming the criminals, he's blaming the guns, and he's proposing five ordinances, some of which will restrict the gun rights of law-abiding citizens and will also likely end up in court because they violate Oregon's firearms pre-emption law. The proposals appear to be hastily crafted and, if adopted, will likely have the unintended consequence of a huge increase in applications for concealed handgun licenses.

http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2010/09/gang_violence_and_the_mayors_f.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. " actions that are typical of those with liberal leanings."
Gross generalizations about liberals? I think this was posted on the wrong site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That appears to be from the article.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. You may not agree with the statement, but the truth hurts. Pro-gun Dems on this site
are under constant attack for "Non-Democrat" and "Non-Progressive" values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. That is "Non-Democratic"
not non Democrat. Another insult to my party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I sincerely apologize. I typed quickly and missed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Using "Democrat" as an adjective is an insult?
For someone who accused another of having "a very thin skin" (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=118&topic_id=337129&mesg_id=337172) you seem to be quite capable of reducing the thickness of your own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Forget it. You won't win with the poster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. The term "democrat party" has become a common insult
used by Limbaugh and Hannity and those that listen to them. Note, I did not say "I" was insulted. I said it was an insult to my party.
from the rules
You are permitted to post polite behavioral corrections to other members of the message board
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I too disagree with the generalization
and in fact find it offensive. Gun control is an urban thing more than a liberal or "Democrat" thing, it just happens that many urbanites are also Democrats and/or liberals. There are plenty of urban Rethugs who are quite opposed to the intent of the 2nd Amendment, too. Liberal = liberal interpretation of rights, all rights...conservative = conservative interpretation of rights (more restrictive interpretations). The Democratic party is moving in the right direction on this issue without the help of ANY Rethug sympathizers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Liberal interpretation of ALL rights is not a problem
It's when posters on this board, a large number of them, support all rights except the 2nd. That gets under my skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. What it is
is the appearance in your op that you dislike liberals; proposing actions that are typical of those with liberal leanings., which I understand is a quote from the article. Then in your response to someone who takes exception to this characterization you defend it by saying, " You may not agree with the statement, but the truth hurts.", and in the same sentence use the term, "Non-Democrat", which is straight from the Rush Limbaugh book of slurs...this is what gets under many on this site's skin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Get this straight, my friend, I DIDN'T write the article
It's an article on goofy gun laws in Portland, Oregon. I don't snip out parts I don't like in any OP I put up. I post the entire thing. To singularly focus on that and ignore the rest of the article, well, I can't help that.

A liberal writer, in a liberal city, in a liberal paper says "liberal-leaning" and people get twisted out of shape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Not to mention the fact that gun control IS NOT A LIBERAL ISSUE, it is a third-way centrist issue.
Most of the gun control BS within the party since the early 1990's was pushed by the centrist DLC/Third Way, as a way to look "tough on crime" to law-and-order authoritarians. Dianne Feinstein, Sarah Brady, Paul Helmke, et al are not liberals.

The "libruls hates gunz" meme needs to die a well deserved death. Most liberals seem to care a lot less about the issue than centrists do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. meant to reply elsewhere. n/t
Edited on Sat Sep-04-10 08:48 AM by X_Digger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. I like one idea ...

The fourth proposal would create a mandatory sentence for the crime of possession of a loaded firearm in a public place. This prohibition, from which concealed handgun licensees are exempt, defines your personal vehicle as a public place. The current penalty is rarely enforced. And given a choice between the penalty or becoming a victim of rape, robbery or murder on the streets, I suspect most will choose to continue to protect themselves and not be deterred by the new penalty. If they are, they'll likely get a concealed carry permit.
http://www.oregonlive.com/opinion/index.ssf/2010/09/gang_violence_and_the_mayors_f.html


The mandatory sentence should be severe enough to deter causal carry of firearms by gang members. It often seems that honest citizens who fail to follow gun laws receive harsher punishment than criminals.

The writer suggests that many citizens who are not criminals will continue to carry concealed without licenses unless the new law deters them, in which case they will run out and cause a major increase in concealed carry licenses. All I can say is that honest citizens who do carry concealed weapons should have a permit to do so in a state that requires it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Your last sentence. Agree completely n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneshooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Is Oregon a "shall issue" or a "may issue" state? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. shall issue. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-05-10 02:42 AM
Response to Original message
18. If I had to wager, I'd bet that the Blue Steel Democrats

are going to open a can of whoop-ass on the mayor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC