Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Branding - "Gun Safety" not "Gun Control"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
Still a Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:33 AM
Original message
Branding - "Gun Safety" not "Gun Control"
Heard Barnacle mention this. Everybody is for gun safety. Gun Control sounds like confiscation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. Sure everyone is for it, but it's misleading.
Safety refers to accident prevention. The trouble with access to guns and ammo is deliberate misuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Any discussion of "access to guns and ammo" is code language for gun confiscation
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 10:40 AM by slackmaster
Access is binary - Either you have access to something, or you don't.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Room for gradation. For example, no new production. Access to existing stock only.
There's no tricking a gun loving public with euphemisms though.

A natural consensus must form by witnessing the tragedies which will continue to occur.

Until the attitude of It's Still Worth It recedes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. There will be no consensus because homicides and violent crime are at multi decade lows.
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 10:49 AM by Statistical
Homicide is at a 40+ year low. You need to go back to 1964 to find a year with lower homicide rate.
Violent crime is at a 30+ year low. You need to back to to 1976 to find a year with lower violent crime rate.
Accidental deaths (by firearms) is at a multi generational low (CDC makes direct comparison to years prior to 1999 difficult). Still less than 1% of accidental deaths (and less than 0.02% of all unintentional deaths) are from firearms.

So why is there a need for more gun control?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Statistics don't capture the horror and injustice of 19 people mowed down in seconds.
That has some impact on public opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Not really. It just "convinces" people who were already convinced.
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 10:56 AM by Statistical
Less than 30% of Americans support banning handguns.


Then there is that whole pesky 2nd amendment which a super majority believe protects an individual right

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #9
17. Advocating for incremental changes toward a ban is still advocating for a ban
Your position is extreme to the extreme.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayNTP Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Guns don't kill, people kill. Guns are safe, as long as people doesn't use them. Since people will..
including some who shouldn't, can there ever be "gun safety"?

Nope. Incidents will continue to occur. Guns just make it easier for deranged people to do damage. If there were no guns, they'd find another way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Another way with reduced lethality. That's important.
And which cannot be used with such wanton impulse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. Let me point an F-150 at you
and floor it. Then we'll talk reduced lethality and wanton impluse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Reduced lethality? HUH?????????
Is it better one kills 3 with a knife instead of using a gun to kill 10? Are you seriously saying fewer deaths are ok if another weapon is used??????????????

Good God.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. No number of deaths are ok. But fewer deaths are better than more deaths.
Surely we can agree on THAT, at least.

Unless you love guns too much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. So you're saying fewer deaths with a gun are ok, as long as there aren't many
Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
appal_jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Agreed.
The NRA offers Gun Safety courses, and very good ones at that (I say that as a NON-NRA member who still appreciates their offerings when it comes to safety).

For the anti-2A crowd, 'gun safety' seems to be their next desired euphemism for further limiting the rights of Americans to keep and bear arms. Sorry, that dog won't hunt.

-app
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trayNTP Donating Member (108 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who came up with "gun control"? Democrats just need to stop accepting GOP memes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Basic gun safety should be taught in public schools
But there are people who would confiscate guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. IMO, the ultimate lesson in the Arizona tragedy is HEALTH CARE
... and how mental health issues are overlooked or stigmatized, and medications are not-so-easily available for those that need them.

Had he had access to, or his parents had access to (I'm assuming they didn't) and followed recommendations for a mental health assessement/treatment and meds for him, this could possibly not have happened. He could have either been in a treatment center, or at the very least, on the list of 'do not sell to' for gun-folks.

Think of how many other Americans are out on the streets without the meds or counseling they need because our health care system doesn't have single payer, or provide everyone access to the basic care they - AND WE AS A SOCIETY - need.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. On two levels Myrian. Anyone who wants guns in the hands of the public should want public health.
Mental health treatment and treatment of bullet wounds resulting from a public policy which tolerates guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Gun Safety" is code for unrestricted access to military grade hardware.
"If I've taken a course in using it, why shouldn't I be able to own a surface to air missile?'



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Strawman. Nobody except you is advocating access to missiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. A fart is still a fart no matter what you call it.
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 10:53 AM by Statistical
Homicide is at a 40+ year low. You need to go back to 1964 to find a year with lower homicide rate.
Violent crime is at a 30+ year low. You need to back to to 1976 to find a year with lower violent crime rate.
Accidental deaths (by firearms) is at a multi generational low (CDC makes direct comparison to years prior to 1999 difficult). Still less than 1% of accidental deaths (and less than 0.02% of all unintentional deaths) are from firearms.

So why is there a need for more gun control?

Making snap judgments based on emotion and fear (and not on statistical evidence) got us the TSA and Patriot Act (neither of which are likely ever going away).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why not call it "Puppies and Kittens"
Everybody (should) loves puppies and kittens... If the words are chosen for their feel value, rather than their accurate description... you get things like the Patriot Act.


:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. That only works if it's not being used as a euphemism for new bans...
and the term was worn completely out during the 1990's and early 2000's due to its incessant use as a ban euphemism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Well, the president just quoted the new line.
I guess we're going to have to wrestle this one for a few falls. Damn, I thought he was smarter then that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Please elaborate.
I have no access to broadcast atm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Instead of gun control, say gun 'safety'.. he said it at the memorial service.
And on that note, was anyone else creeped out by the college kids yelling and hooting for their school? At a fucking memorial.. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Transcript in G.D.
Transcript here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x188408

"You see, when a tragedy like this strikes, it is part of our nature to demand explanations - to try to impose some order on the chaos, and make sense out of that which seems senseless. Already we've seen a national conversation commence, not only about the motivations behind these killings, but about everything from the merits of gun safety laws to the adequacy of our mental health systems. Much of this process, of debating what might be done to prevent such tragedies in the future, is an essential ingredient in our exercise of self-government."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beevul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Thank you. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-12-11 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Orwellian Newspeak.. not gonna fly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC