Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GA: Judge upholds ban on guns in places of worship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:16 PM
Original message
GA: Judge upholds ban on guns in places of worship

By Rhonda Cook
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution


A federal judge has upheld the Georgia law banning weapons in churches, mosques and synagogues, saying gun rights advocates had not shown that carrying a firearm is necessary to practicing any religion.

U.S. District Judge Ashley Royal late Monday dismissed a lawsuit filed by the gun rights organization GeorgiaCarry.org and the minister at the Baptist Tabernacle of Thomaston. Royal wrote that Georgia law did not violate the First Amendment right to freedom of religion or the Second Amendment guarantee of a right to bear arms.

Also on Monday, a north Georgia legislator filed a bill to remove the restriction on guns in places of worship. House Bill 54, filed by Rep. Bobby Franklin, R-Marietta, eliminates places of worship from the list of prohibited places.

John Monroe, the attorney who filed the suit, said no decision has been made about appealing Royal’s decision or dropping the issue. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.ajc.com/news/judge-upholds-ban-on-815301.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. i think I'm going to faint
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deep breaths.
You can worship without the aid of an Uzi.

It can be done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here we go
Edited on Tue Jan-25-11 05:21 PM by Kingofalldems
:popcorn: K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nuclear Unicorn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. The judge should get out more often
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-25-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great!
I'm surprised to hear of such good common sense in a judicial opinion from GA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowrider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Won't stop me. I'd rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
8. A good decision
states should have the authority to some restrictions. If there are restrictions imposed by the state, the legislative process is far more accessible at that level. If this were a federal restriction, it would be struck down IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YllwFvr Donating Member (757 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. i dont go to church
id rather carry to the bar ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Didn't gun control proponents say guns were a religion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glassunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-26-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. I'm stuck on one line in the entire article...
"had not shown that carrying a firearm is necessary to practicing any religion.

It is not about the practice of a religion, it is about self defense while practicing any religion. The two are completely separate as one does not rely, nor relate to the other.

I'm looking at it from the angle of taking any other legal activity and inserting it into the statement.
"had not shown that carrying a firearm is necessary to driving a car.
"had not shown that carrying a firearm is necessary to going camping.
"had not shown that carrying a firearm is necessary to visting an ATM machine.
"had not shown that carrying a firearm is necessary to reading this garbage.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC