which is more accurate, the systematic method of background check or the sheriffs eyeball and opinion

[lawodevolution]

What do you trust more? Shall issue using a systematic system of background checks

May issue where a sheriff or other individual can decide if you get a permit, perhaps depending on how much bribe money you're willing to offer up or depending on if they are on the "correct" political side or depending on if they like the "correct" football team or purhaps if you are a family member or friend of the shariff or maybe the shariff will do what's right and give a "deserving" person the permit based on what the shariff thinks is "deserving".

[jpak]

1. Option 3 - No Issue

yup

[lawodevolution]

2. then why did you vote for may issue?

[Pullo]

8. Of couse shall issue is the logical answer here based an facts and not hysterics

However I'd rather have seen a green option as well

[rl6214]

10. Wasn't one of the options dimwit

NOPE

NOPE

NOPE

[Oneka]

11. an epiphany?

No Issue..

Thats how it should be, just like in Az, Ak Vt.

I'm happy to see that you have finally posted something that i agree with.

[WatsonT]

3. Is this a trick?

:)

[lawodevolution]

4. Nope, which is better. Doesn't mean you like either

[RSillsbee]

5. Option 4 Vermont carry NT

[ileus]

6. I want to vote green...

[slackmaster]

7. May-issue may be appropriate in Mayberry, where the Sheriff knows everyone personally

Most of us don't live in Mayberry.

[YllwFvr]

9. shall issue, all the way

agreed with these others too. Green carry please.