Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

First pediatricians — now NRA aims at sheriffs (FL)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:27 PM
Original message
First pediatricians — now NRA aims at sheriffs (FL)
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2011-03-19/news/os-scott-maxwell-nra-extremism-03201120110319_1_nra-lobbyist-marion-hammer-pediatricians-anti-gun

<snip>

The NRA and freshman state Rep. Jason Brodeur, R-moran- Sanford, wanted to imprison doctors and fine them as much as $5 million for asking patients questions about gun ownership.

<snip>

Part of what the lawmen have done to earn Hammer's ire was to oppose a bill allowing people to openly carry firearms without storing them in safety holsters.

Seminole Sheriff Don Eslinger actually traveled to Tallahassee last week to speak on behalf of the Florida Sheriffs Association, which didn't like this bill.

The association said openly visible weapons make some people nervous — a bad idea in a tourist state.

<more>

The NRA doesn't care about your Florida tourist industry

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember when anti-gun folks said the Stand Your Ground law would decrease tourism..
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 07:52 PM by aikoaiko
You were wrong then too. lol.

So much fail. Please, keep posting jpak.

edited to add the historical reference.



watching you appeal to the same ineffective fear mongering is a pleasure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Remember this one?



And concealed carry would inhibit tourism..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Oh I remember.....

they thought that message was embarrassing, but a lot of gun folks I knew considered it fair warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
friendly_iconoclast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The billboards and the BC campaign didn't last very long, did they?
The Brady Campaign's views on Florida gun law turned out to be quite irrelevant to 99.9% of those who were not

Brady Campaign members. Their pronoia was rather amusing to behold...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. right!
I figure it's more like a public service announcement. Might even have a nice side-effect on crime rates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russ1943 Donating Member (405 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Here's a historical reference.
In the first full year that the Castle Doctrine bill law went into effect in 2006, the number and rate of persons murdered with firearms in Florida went UP 38% and 42% respectively, from the previous year. http://www.fdle.state.fl.us/Content/getdoc/332e1b3d-2648-4b06-8be5-d322f340c95d/1971_fwd_murder_firearms.aspx

Nationally the US number and rate of persons murdered with firearms from 2005 to 2006 were both less than 4%.
http://webappa.cdc.gov/cgi-bin/broker.exe
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/glance/tables/guncrimetab.cfm

The Brady poster was appropriate advice for tourists and Floridians!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Justifiable Homicide != Murder
Have any numbers on justifiable homicides?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Can we say "post hoc ergo propter hoc"?
X_digger's got you bang to rights: logically, if the adoption of a Castle Doctrine law were to result in an increase in shootings (fatal or otherwise), it should result in an increase in shootings ruled justifiable, not ones ruled to be criminal.

Once again, correlation does not imply causation. To illustrate, there's a very strong correlation between the birth rate in the Netherlands and the stork population. Does that prove that babies are actually delivered by storks? If you've ever attended a birth, you know that's not the case. Ergo, it's a matter of coincidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. See xdigger, but even more strange is how you ignored the neg % change in recent years.

oh, did you miss those numbers?

lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawodevolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't care about what some dude who thinks that a badge
gives him more political importance than me says or what some jerk who thinks a badge gives him the authority to rule my life thinks. Open carry, I hope you are ready for it because it's coming to the south. This racist mistake is going to be corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. In fairness, sheriffs are elected officials
And as such, they do have some measure of political authority on the basis of their electoral mandate. That said, though, sheriffs are part of the executive branch of government, not the legislative branch; their job is to enforce the law, not to decide what the law is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. From reading the article
The Sheriff wanted mandatory level 2 holsters for open carry.

From a retention standpoint, it makes sense for people to voluntarily choose a higher level holster but mandating it is stupid.

As far as openly visible firearms making people nervous..... Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. unrec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. The NRA is ridiculous.
The Sheriff is right. Openly visible weapons do make people nervous and it is a stupid idea for a tourist State.

Why must people feel they need to display their guns anyway? Some kind of macho thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Can you cite some examples ?
I OC frequently and I've had exactly one person even give me the Stank eye about it most people don't even notice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. doubt that they don't notice
Why do you feel you need to display your gun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Because I prefer not to wear an IWB holster
It also gets a little warm for a jacket or even a second shirt at times in Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Has this been a problem in any other state that allows it and has a lot of tourism?
Vermont?
New Hampshire?
Arizona?
Utah?
Wyoming?
Montana?
Virginia?
etc., etc.....

We'll wait while you dig up some numbers and evidence...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. For that matter, how about "gun grabs" from OCers' holsters?
I've heard of one or maybe two instances of this happening in the past five years or so. It's not what you'd call a common occurrence, as far as I'm aware. I could be horribly mistaken, but I'd want to see some evidence before I concede that I am.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. When I OC I tend to keep an eye on who's around me NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
24. Hasn't been a problem in the states that already have Open Carry.
Why should FL be any different?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. You can see the anti gun agenda right off the bat
Nothing either of these dimwits says makes any difference to me.

NOPE

NOPE

NOPE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Remmah2 Donating Member (971 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
19. What's a "safety holster"?
Is that like a child seat for my high capacity "clips".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
23. It would be helpful if the article hadn't garbled the proposal so badly.
I am aware that there is a movement to legalize open carry in Florida. I don't think it has anything to do with "safety holsters," whatever the heck that is. (If they're talking about retention holsters, Florida law doesn't currently allow open carry at all, retention holster or not, so that's a red herring.)

Anybody have a link to an article that actually reports what the legislation would do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC