Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Garden City Beach woman second family member killed by "accidental" shooting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
right2bfree Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 04:36 PM
Original message
Garden City Beach woman second family member killed by "accidental" shooting
Source: The Sun News.Com

News - Breaking News

Monday, Mar. 21, 2011

New details: Garden City Beach woman second family member killed by accidental shooting

by Kurt Knapek

Police said Monday that a 53-year-old Garden City woman who died Sunday was shot and killed by her ex-husband who she allowed to move back into their house after their divorce, and the same home where the couple's son also died of an accidental shooting in 2003.

Cheryl Gillespie was killed Sunday when her ex-husband, Gary, shot and killed her during a dispute with another family member, police said. Gary Gillespie, 59, is charged with murder.

On Dec. 1, 2003, Nicholas Allen ``Nick'' Gillespie was killed by an accidental, self-inflicted gunshot wound, police said. Nick Gillespie, 17, was found shot in the head in the living room of the home on East Surfwind Drive. He was pronounced dead at the hospital.

Police also revealed Monday that Gary and Cheryl Gillespie had been divorced for several years, but that Gary Gillespie moved back into the home a few years ago, said Sgt. Robert Kegler of Horry County police.

Read more: http://www.thesunnews.com/2011/03/21/2052690/new-details-garden-city-beach.html#ixzz1HGtqD9dY


Read more: http://www.thesunnews.com/2011/03/21/2052690/new-details-garden-city-beach.html#ixzz1HGtqD9dY



Yup, another one of those devices that keep Americans, oh so "safe", responsible for another needless death by firearm!!

Mr. Obama, Please sir, enact the National Firearms Safety Act so that this doesn't have to happen to thousands of more
Americans who are killed by unstable people like this man, who should never have been allowed to possess a gun, again
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. With this mess of a family, you are blaming the gun?
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 05:38 PM by Hangingon
Wow! The son dies of an apparent self inflicted wound. Rounds - possibly shells? - are all over the floor. There also seem to be witnesses.

Then the estranged husband is allowed back in the home where he becomes involved in an armed altercation with someone (unknown). He kills the wife with an errant shot. The son gets arrested somehow. Then the husband comes out of the bushes. Again there are witnesses.

What a surprise that there was a problem. No new law will stop this sort of mess from happening. If they didn't have guns this tribe woud have used knives or what ever was available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you are blaming the gun?
As Eddie Izzard said:

"THE GUN HELPS"

No one is "blaming it on the gun". Besides, in the case of the murder, the gun was used correctly. It's for killing something and it was used for that. The accidental fatal shooting was indeed an accident. But, y'know, with a knife, he might have just cut himself.


"No new law will stop this sort of mess from happening."

Indeed.

But eroding and stopping an attitude that "nothing can be done" and that guns are some kind of sacred artifact that plays no part in situations like this will definitely help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So law do you propose that would have prevented this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I don't know Eddie Izzard is and don't really care
"But, y'know, with a knife, he might have just cut himself." With these folks that is entirely likely. Most tools are dangerous.

"But eroding and stopping an attitude that "nothing can be done" and that guns are some kind of sacred artifact that plays no part in situations like this will definitely help." I do not have that attitude that nothing can be done but I am careful about my solutions. Obviously, the guns in this on-going tragedy played a part.

Tell me - the family has had problems with the police but no felony convictions or jail time and no adjudication of mental illness. The now dead with, despite sexual abuse complaints, apparently did not file a complain or get a restraining order. What would have been done to keep guns out of his hands? Keep in mind the need for due process. Please do not tell me outlaw gun - because then you are blaming guns.

By the way, a gun is not a sacred artifact and referring to them as "sacred artifacts" as you did in your response is offensive. I do not appreciate the attribution. A gun is a tool and should mot be misused or used without training.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Agree with your last sentence. Guns do play a part, and glamorizing/promoting them makes it worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
right2bfree Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Indeed so. Once the NFSA is passed many of these murders and suicides will drop precipitously. Its..
..only a matter of time until this occurs in the United States, as elsewhere too.

A few more mass spree-killings and most Americans, who no longer own guns, about 65
percent or more nowadays, will be behind a program that gets the guns out of thee hands
of those least mentally-able to use them in a safe and lawful manner. And without killing
someone accidentally, or by a willful act, due to thier inherently mental illnesses and/or
thier drug and alcohol addictions and abuse behaviors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RSillsbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:33 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. What alternate universe do you live in?
More and more states are easing gun restricitons. Two states in the last 3 months have gone to permitless carry and several more have similar legislation pending. we are down to two states that don't have some form of concealed carry and one of them should be shall issue by the end of the year.

Please demonstrrate how things are swinging towards more restrictions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. You're just making stuff up.
There is no "NFSA."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. NFSA
National Flying Squirrel Association

Welcome to the National Flying Squirrel Association!
The gathering place for everything pertaining to flying furballs and the people that are owned by them.

http://www.nfsa.us/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. NFSA-National Flying Squirrel Association?
http://www.nfsa.us/

Welcome to the National Flying Squirrel Association!
The gathering place for everything pertaining to flying furballs and the people that are owned by them.


That's one of the few references to the NFSA I can find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
26. There is no such legislation in congress.
It exist only in your mind. Or maybe you really work for Crosstime Traffic and have gotten your alternates confused. (Let's see how many catch that reference.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rl6214 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. I would question whether this was really accidental
If it was indeed NOT accidental, it really dosen't matter what tool was used, he would have killed her anyway.

In order for President Obama to enact the National Firearms Safety Act, it would have to get to his desk first. I don't think that will ever happen. Too many pro gun Republicans AND Democrats in the house to get it passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. +10
"Ooops, sorry, I just don't know how it is that I accidentally shot that bitch of an ex-wife of mine, I mean, umm. I want to talk to my lawyer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. Outlaw marriage.
It's the only sane choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rrneck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Stupid ain't illegal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Please explain what you mean by "the National Firearms Safety Act"
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. It's made up of nice words
National - Something for all of us
Firearms - Pretty straightforward, gets right to the point
Safety - Who could possibly be against safety?
Act - It would mean we're DOING something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. With a population of over 300 million, there will be stories like this.
That is no reason to try to take my guns away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
right2bfree Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. How do we know that there is no reason for people to fear your guns? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrookBrew Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Same reason you dont have to be afraid of a black man in a hoodie
the vast majority of time he is just coming back from a workout...

But maybe we should ban people from wearing hoodies because some people (of all races) wear them during crimes. We can ban bandannas, especially red and blue, I mean that would end the blood and crips. No more bandannas, no more gangs.

Maybe the Anti Saloon League (oops VPC) can push some law, the Assault Sweatshirt Protection Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. I don't care whether you fear my guns or not
That's your problem, not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. You can fear what you want.
The statistics show that you are 27 times more likely to be struck by lightning that illegally shot and killed by a CCW holder. So if you are afraid of me and my guns, then a thunderstorms should be a terror to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atypical Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. What act?
Yup, another one of those devices that keep Americans, oh so "safe", responsible for another needless death by firearm!!

Why do you want to use one of the 30,0000 annual firearm homicide cases to take away the firearms from the other 40-80 million firearm owners each year who commit no crimes with their firearms?

Mr. Obama, Please sir, enact the National Firearms Safety Act so that this doesn't have to happen to thousands of more
Americans who are killed by unstable people like this man, who should never have been allowed to possess a gun, again


What is this National Firearms Safety Act you are talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Callisto32 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
17. The prez unilaterally enacts legislation, now, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeepnstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm seeing a pattern here.
It's too soon to say, but I'm suspecting these "accidents" aren't all that accidental. "Accidentally" shot during a domestic dispute? Seeing as how the shooter is charged with murder I kind of doubt the "It was an accident, the gun went off by itself." argument is going to hold water.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC