|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 11:27 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should SAM missles, RPG's, Claymore mines, ICBM's, and the sort |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 11:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. "A well regulated militia..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbnd45 (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 11:37 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. An explanation I have heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benburch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 01:54 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Perhaps. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbnd45 (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 12:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. "regulated" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. Yes, what on earth have the courts to do with interpreting the law? /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mbnd45 (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. They decide how they're gonna rule first, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-20-04 09:29 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Lately? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Romulus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-20-04 02:50 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. I think YOUR understanding of the courts is out of date |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-20-04 03:04 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. That's REALLY funny, rom..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 09:19 AM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Do you really believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DieboldMustDie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. I want my own nukes, damn it! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes they should all be legal for civilians to own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 11:49 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. DEA agents annihilated... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-18-04 11:55 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pert_UK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 03:15 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Holy living fuck............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 11:57 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. What do you mean no legitimate civilian use? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pert_UK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-20-04 10:03 AM Response to Reply #12 |
22. And that passes for logical argument, does it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-20-04 12:11 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. At least as logical as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pert_UK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-21-04 03:01 AM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Genius....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-21-04 02:03 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. Sensible logical points? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-21-04 03:23 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. ICBMs should be sold to the general public - that's "your side," is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-21-04 03:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. What's wrong with ICBMs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 09:31 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Anything larger than a 'G' engine requires an explosives permit now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 12:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. I believe the real hurdle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 09:29 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. They're just large rockets, max |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 09:43 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. InterContinental Ballistic Missiles - that's what ICBMs are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 10:02 AM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Please cite the law that says I can't build my own working Minuteman 3 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 11:42 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Read the question again. The first word is "Should," not "Can." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 11:46 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. I think people should |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 11:50 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Too too funny... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 11:55 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. So the assumption is that if an ICBM was shot into North Korea from the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 12:26 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. YOU'RE the only one talking about shooting anything at North Korea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:40 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. A) We have only your word for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 06:19 PM Response to Reply #47 |
57. Please let us know the moment that a lunatic builds a 'Z' engine model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 06:56 PM Response to Reply #57 |
60. So you're really, actually going to make a stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 07:41 PM Response to Reply #60 |
63. If you don't like the fact that ICBMs aren't regulated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 10:05 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. No argument too absurd for our "pro gun democrats" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 12:51 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. It's a shame I can't quote your feelings on gun owners. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:42 PM Response to Reply #46 |
48. When MrBenchley says something one-tenth as ridiculous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Consider the source, max... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:50 PM Response to Reply #48 |
50. I would, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:56 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. Read the thread - if that's not asking too much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:58 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. You're just upset |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #54 |
55. I don't actually have a "side" in this poll, Feeb. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FeebMaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 06:17 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Uh huh, suuuuuuuuure. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. Looks to me like you don't understand the current state of the law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 07:01 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. Deleted message |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 07:40 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Too bad you have to use an ad hominem argument to make your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 08:01 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Uh . . . slack . . . what do you think my point WAS? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-23-04 12:43 AM Response to Reply #64 |
65. Anyone who makes amateur psychiatric diagnoses over the Internet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-23-04 09:57 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Thank you, Humpty Dumpty. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibLabUK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:53 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. One comment comes to mind... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. With Bush in the White House, the U.S. laughs at international law. /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-22-04 06:22 PM Response to Reply #51 |
58. Keep in mind we're just talking about rockets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LibLabUK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-23-04 01:55 AM Response to Reply #58 |
66. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-23-04 10:49 AM Response to Reply #66 |
68. There are no such restrictions on amateur rocketry in the US |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-30-04 04:18 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Awesome pics!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoNotRefill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-21-04 09:12 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. well, considering that there are 250,000 legal nfa weapons in the us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoNotRefill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-21-04 09:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
32. pert, RPGs are legal in most of the US..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoeBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 05:28 AM Response to Original message |
9. The Second Amendment refers to... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot (485 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 07:02 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. This one? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoeBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 03:05 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Not that one... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. Well, that'd be muskets and swords. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cedarriver (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
11. OK, militia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 05:15 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. As far as number 2 is concerned, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swineguy (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-20-04 10:13 AM Response to Reply #17 |
23. So gun owners don't exist in the USA? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
library_max (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-20-04 02:47 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Try to grasp the rather simple distinction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slutticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
18. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-04 05:21 PM Response to Original message |
19. You're being way too conservative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:34 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC