http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=337041&contrassID=2&subContrassID=3&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=YThere is place for great concern in light of the
acute criticism voiced by Ephraim Halevy in this
week's Haaretz Magazine, regarding the functioning
of the prime minister and the way he makes policy
decisions. In the past year, says Halevy - who was
the confidant of six prime ministers and has just
resigned as head of the National Security Council
- there has been "an intolerable sense of
offhandedness in making fateful decisions" in the
Prime Minister's Bureau. "Things are happening
there that I can't explain," he says.
<snipo>
Indeed, Halevy's trenchant remarks would seem to
confirm a certain feeling that prevails among
many of those who are following Sharon's
activity. The sense they have is that the prime
minister is caught inside a kind of bubble of
functional lassitude and conceptual vacuity. He
is more passive than active. Initiative and
innovation in the policy realm, even at the
tactical level, are manifestly out of the
question.
<snippage>
Halevy notes justly that "anyone with eyes in
his head understands that we will not remain in
the Gaza Strip." This being so, it might have
been possible to consider a move in Gaza that
would thaw the situation and signal that Israel
is bent on a settlement. However, for that to
happen, even to think about some sort of
movement, there has to be willingness to think
anew and formulate new solutions. Prime
Minister Sharon is blatantly not displaying any
readiness or desire for this. The country, in
its melancholy situation, does not deserve
leadership like this - leadership that is
leading nowhere.
=============================
"functional lassitude " I think there is a pill for that...