Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two Years after the ICJ's Decision on the Separation Barrier

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-11-06 12:24 AM
Original message
Two Years after the ICJ's Decision on the Separation Barrier


9 July 2006: Two Years after the ICJ's Decision on the Separation Barrier

Two years ago today <9 July 2004>, the International Court of Justice, in The Hague , gave its advisory opinion on the Separation Barrier. The judges held that building the barrier in the West Bank violates international law. Thus, the court held, Israel must tear down the sections that stray from the Green Line, cancel the accompanying permit regime, and compensate Palestinians whose rights were violated by the barrier. The court also urged the UN General Assembly and the Security Council to consider actions to end the illegal situation created following construction of the barrier in the West Bank .

Despite the court's opinion, Israel has continued to build the barrier inside the West Bank . The planned length of the barrier is, at the present time, 700 kilometers: fifty-one percent has been completed, thirteen percent is under construction, and construction has not begun on thirty-six percent.

Some eighty percent of the planned route lies inside the West Bank , with the remaining twenty percent running along the Green Line. Upon completion of the barrier, 8.5 percent of the West Bank (including East Jerusalem ) will be situated in the "seam zone," the area between the barrier and the Green Line. This area contains sixty settlements (including twelve in East Jerusalem), in which some 381,000 Israelis live (192,000 in East Jerusalem ).

The ICJ held that, despite Israel 's contention that security considerations alone were taken into account in setting the route, there is a suspicion that the barrier will establish "completed facts" that will lead to Israel 's de facto annexation of the seam zone, in violation of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination. According to B'Tselem's joint research with Bimkom, the main consideration in setting the route along twelve sections of the barrier was the desire to place west of the barrier lands that are intended for settlement expansion. In one of the cases, the Israeli Iigh Court has confirmed that the central consideration in setting the route was the existence of an unapproved settlement expansion plan, and that the information provided by the state in the matter was false.

As a result of the barrier's construction in the West Bank , seventeen Palestinian towns and villages, in which 27,500 Palestinians reside, will be situated, following completion of the barrier, in the "seam zone". The residents will have to obtain permits from the Israelis to continue living in their homes. Another 220,000 Palestinians, who live in East Jerusalem, will also find themselves living west of the barrier and will have to cross checkpoints and hold permits to allow them to go to various parts of the West Bank . Tens of thousands of other Palestinians who own land in the "seam zone" will have to obtain permits to enter and work their farmland. Past experience has shown that the permit regime severely impairs the right of thousands of Palestinians to freedom of movement, to work, and to gain a livelihood.

More at;
B'Tselem


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC