Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mother Jones Smears Rachel Corrie!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:00 PM
Original message
Mother Jones Smears Rachel Corrie!!!
Subject title taken from this article in CounterPunch Sept 20th:

Mother Jones demonstrated how low it could set its standards for investigative journalism when it hired Newsweek reporter Joshua Hammer to surf the web and write a 7000-word feature story on Rachel Corrie and the International Solidarity Movement ("The Death of Rachel Corrie", Sept/Oct 2003 - posted here). It appears that fact-checking and verification was not a priority in the production of this article...

What's amazing is that in Hammer's 7000-word article, he spends very little time explaining what ISM really is. He makes no mention of its purely nonviolent tactics or even its most basic activities, such as accompanying ambulances, assisting farmers in reaching their crops, clearing roadblocks, and walking children to school, perhaps because they're not sensationalist enough to merit his attention. He does not even explain ISM's goal, except for the misleading claim that ISM "upholds" the right to "armed resistance." In truth ISM's goal is to nonviolently resist the Israeli occupation. That simple objective is mentioned nowhere in his article. Instead, if we are to envision ISM according to Hammer's description, we would have to imagine that it is a group of animal-rights activists in their 20s who enter military zones and establish divestment campaigns.



This is the exactly the same type of propaganda and vilification of Rachel and the ISM that the far-right pundits have been engaged in ever since she was murdered by an Israeli bulldozer driver. So what the hell is Mother Jones doing printing ignorant, far-right garbage? Only blind nationalists and Sharon apologists spew this nonsense.

I thought Mother Jones was on the side of peace activism and radical/progressive politics? Guess not. So now they've succumbed to making excuses for the murder of a non-violent peace activist? Way to go MJ - you are now a disgrace to leftist activism in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmm, I read the article in Mother Jones and didn't get that
impression from it. Definitely not a "smear" of Rachel Corrie.

I thought it was actually a very informative article and it evoked great emotion (in me) about the cause and manner of her death.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hmm
Edited on Sat Sep-20-03 08:16 PM by Resistance
the writer says: "She should be an iconic figure — to foolish idealism" and "so far the larger message of her life appears to be one of futility" which to me sounds like the same argument put forth by Israel's right-wing apologists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I highly doubt that
I have the article right here in front of me. I've been scanning it to try and find the phrases you quote, but so far I can't locate them.

I don't doubt those phrases are in the article, but based on common sense, as well as the general tone of the article, I doubt the writer said those things about Corrie. What I suspect is the writer presented different views on Corrie and her activities and the phrases you mention are actually quotes from someone the writer spoke to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. 2nd to last paragraph
It is the writer's words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. OK
I didn't realize the full article was linked to above, so I did a search on the text and this seems to be the passage you're referring to:

She should be an iconic figure—to foolish idealism, to bravery against impossible odds, to the bittersweet conviction of youth—and to a handful of people she may be, but so far the larger message of her life appears to be one of futility. In the last three years, 3,000 people—Palestinians, Israelis, journalists, soldiers, suicide bombers, settlers, and human shields—have died. No one death has the power to shock anymore.

So while I was wrong about the author quoting someone else, I still say you have taken those quotes out of context. The whole passage does not characterize Corrie or her death in the way your selected quotes would imply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. well
Edited on Sat Sep-20-03 09:19 PM by Resistance
I have read so many right-wing pundits slam Corrie for her "foolish idealism" that I suppose reading it there in the MJ article was a bit of a trigger for me. Couple those feelings with the fact that the writer (as Nguyen demonstrates) plagiarizes and distorts the story using right-wing materials ... this is a source of frustration and outrage for me. I am tired of encountering it in the progressive journals.

It's exactly the kind of "foolish idealism" that Corrie exemplifies which drives all the great activists and visionaries, from Thomas Paine to Gandhi. Progressives should honor persons like her - not write them off as having wasted their lives with futility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. "No one death has the power to shock anymore."
true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. There were many inaccuracies in the article
Not to mention the fact that the author is guilty of plagiarism.

See the article about it in the Press Releases section here: http://www.palsolidarity.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Counterpunch is a notorius CIA-controlled phony left pub.
It specializes in bashing Jews and Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
26. Oh, Please
Criticizing Israel is not "bashing Jews".

And the Democrats have never been "left". The Dems went from being the party of the Southern rich to the party of corporations and their union bureaucrat collaborators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying_Pig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
27. Bullshit Sagle.....
CounterPunch is about the only source out there telling the truth about I/P issues, and that's not beholden to the PNAC/AIPAC/Likudniks you hold so dear. I don't hold them dear, and enjoy hearing the other side of the story, free from Likud/radical-Zionist propaganda!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. Actually any words, spoken by anybody on any topic, in any context
are an attack on Jews and Israel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-23-03 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
39. Notorious
means widely known. Since, according to you, this "fact" is widely known, could you provide a link or some evidence to back up your statement.
Oh, I also heard that Fox News is actually a front for Hillary Clinton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. I haven't read MoJo in years
specifically because they started filling it with so many ads from so many despicable companies. That and they started getting all hippy-dippy new-agey with their articles. I mean, I don't give a shit about what Herbal Tea is better-- tell me about how we're going to stop losing American jobs, and stopping this country from become the worlds largest exporter of terror.

MoJo has become less and less relevant to the progressive community, who have abondoned them in droves. They're content to cater to the suburban yuppie crowd than to the progressive rank-and-file. The Progressive and The Nation, In These Times and Z have better coverage and commentary anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. The index of the current issue of Mother Jones
is at this page: http://www.motherjones.com/toc/2003/36/ma_526_01.html
with links to abbreviated articles. The contents don't seem much like your characterization. You say you haven't read it in years and then make assertions about its yuppie focus that don't seem to be supported by the current issue's content. Maybe it's time to review the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. Totally Agree
Mother Jones has gone the way of Utne Reader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hamsterhuey Donating Member (129 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. what do you expect from counterpunch?
it's goal seems to be to attack everything on the left since, as we all know, there is only one way to be liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. you might read the article
before slamming CounterPunch with generalizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. The truth of her tragic death was all sides were equally responsible
Just like the Israeli-Palestine nightmare, both sides are wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. i read the article
and almost cried about the story right on the subway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MariMayans Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. what does that mean?
One of the things that makes me vomitously ill about everything that happens in Israel/Palestine is that someone always jumps in and says "cycle of violence", "both sides are at fault", yadda, yadda not that it really has to have anything to do with the truth but it's the American "liberal" viewpoint because the issues involve two "victim" classes and as an american "liberal" this is just unacceptable so rather than assign blame things get watered down into this sort of nonsense out of liberal guilt.

No way in hell did she ask for what she got, nor is there anyway of justifying it. If there was you wouldn't have gotten straight out lies and agitprop from Israel initially.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Well, actually, it's true...
the I/P situation is because of actions by both sides. This particular incident, though, we agree on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am becoming less and less enamored with ...
the "journalism" offered by Counterpunch and, for that matter, Mother Jones and even FAIR after the egregious smear piece by Madsen they blasted to all corners of the creation. I don't doubt that any of them would turn on anything if it occurred to them to do so. Truth often takes a backseat to ideology.

It's actually quite sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I see your point
but the CP writer, Phan Nguyen, actually does an impressive job here of showing how Hammer plagiarizes (using clearly right-wing sources), misinforms, and distorts the real story. I'm with Nguyen on this. MJ should at the bare minimum at least take some time to fact check the stuff it is printing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. I don't canonize her.
How arrogant do you have to be? How smugly superior to events?

A bull dozer is not a racing vehicle. It could be outrun by a fast snail. But that girl did not believe she could be hurt in a world of hurt. Why not? Where did she think she was?

She died of stupidity. If she was making a point, it was that a human life isn't as important as a building.

But God forbid anybody criticize a true martyr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Woah
You ask "how arrogant do you have to be?"

Maybe you're one to answer that, since you're so quick to claim that Rachel "died of stupidity".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. "If she was making a point, it was that a human life..."
"If she was making a point, it was that a human life isn't as important as a building."

This statement better applies to the person who was driving the bulldozer.

I don't know what world you live in, but I don't want to be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durutti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. She hardly "died of stupidity"
She understood, as do all ISMers, that she could be hurt or killed in an action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindacooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. I cancelled Mother Jones
before the 2000 election, when all they did was bash Gore. I will never read that rag again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
21. Rachel Corrie...in her Parent's Words.....from NC where her parents live..
This is a letter which has no copyright...as it was posted on NC Indy Media to be distributed:

Rachel Corrie: A Parents Statement of Their Daughter

BBSNews - 2003-03-20 -- Our daughter Rachel, a volunteer with the International Solidarity Movement in the Occupied Territories, died Sunday in the Gaza Strip while courageously trying to prevent the demolition of a Palestinian home. Our loss is immense, but we are buoyed by the outpouring of support and love that we’ve received from around the world. We understand that Rachel is being remembered in many places in many beautiful ways, and we are grateful. We are comforted and heartened by the compassionate expressions of love that we have received from both Palestinian and Israeli people. We will forever remember and be thankful for Rachel’s ISM and Palestinian friends who cared for her and who held her for us as she died.

We are speaking out today because of Rachel’s fears about the impact of a war with Iraq on the people in the Occupied Territories. She reported to us that her Palestinian friends were afraid that with all eyes on Iraq, the Israeli Defense Forces would escalate activity in the Occupied Territories. Rachel wanted to be in Gaza if that happened.

In the last six weeks, Rachel became our eyes and ears for Rafah, a city at the southern tip of Gaza. Now that she’s no longer there, we are asking members of Congress and, truly, all the world to watch and listen.

One week ago I came rather timidly to members of Rachel’s delegation in Congress, expressing my concerns for the safety of those in the International Solidarity Movement. A piece of me wonders if I had spoken louder or sooner, if this week’s tragedy might have been averted. So today I am speaking up in memory of my daughter and on behalf of all her friends in Gaza.

We are greatly concerned for the non-violent internationals volunteering in the Occupied Territories. We ask that members of Congress call upon the Israeli government to cease harassment of these individuals and, specifically, to cease firing upon them when they are engaged in protecting the Palestinian water supply, protecting Palestinian homes from illegal demolitions, and retrieving bodies of murdered Palestinians for return to their families – all events Rachel witnessed.

In my last phone conversation with Rachel, she expressed that when we fail to support and protect the Internationals who resist non–violently, we also undercut the non-violent initiatives of the Palestinians. We are, therefore, asking our members of Congress to demand that the American Embassy in Tel Aviv, when called upon for assistance, provide all reasonable support to non-violent, American volunteers in the Occupied Territories, as well as support to other internationals as appropriate.

We are asking members of Congress to bring the U.S. government’s attention back to the Israeli-Palestinian crisis and to recognize that the occupation of the Palestinian territories is an overwhelming and continuous act of collective violence against the Palestinian people. We ask that military aid to Israel be commensurate with its efforts to end its occupation of the Palestinian Territories and to adhere to the rules of international law.

Rachel would not want her death to overshadow that of others. In barely glancing at headlines since word came of Rachel’s death, I note that many have died this week in the Occupied Territories – one a four-year-old child. I would like to be able to hold the mother of that child and to have her hold me.

Yesterday, I looked at a publication entitled "Who Will Save the Children?" with photos of children who have died since September 2000 in Israel and in the Occupied Territories. I understand that the next publication will be dedicated to Rachel and will include her photograph.

I want the mothers of these children to know that I have looked at the beaming faces of each of their babies and that I know how much the world has lost with the passing of each one of them.

In one of her e-mails Rachel wrote, "Today as I walked on top of the rubble where homes once stood, Egyptian soldiers called to me from the other side of the border, ‘Go! Go!’ because a tank was coming. Followed by waving and "what’s your name?" There is something disturbing about this friendly curiosity. It reminded me of how much, to some degree, we are all kids curious about other kids: Egyptian kids shouting at strange women wandering into the path of tanks. Palestinian kids shot from the tanks when they peek out from behind walls to see what’s going on. International kids standing in front of tanks with banners. Israeli kids in the tanks anonymously, occasionally shouting - and also occasionally waving – many forced to be here, many just aggressive, shooting into the houses as we wander away." How I wish that the young man in the bulldozer that killed Rachel could have just stopped, hopped out, and talked to her. He would have met a beautiful soul.

In another e-mail, Rachel wrote, "This has to stop. I think it is a good idea for us all to drop everything and devote our lives to making this stop. I don’t think it’s an extremist thing to do anymore. I really want to dance around to Pat Benatar and have boyfriends and make comics for my co-workers. But I also want this to stop. Disbelief and horror is what I feel. Disappointment. I am disappointed that this is the base reality of our world and that we, in fact, participate in it. This is not at all what I asked for when I came into this world. This is not at all what the people here asked for when they came into this world. This is not what they are asking for now. This is not the world you and Dad wanted me to come into when you decided to have me."

Rachel’s brutal death illustrates dramatically the madness of war.

Craig and Cindy Corrie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. Israel murders an American peace activist
and the message from the parents of the activist is only covered by NC Indy Media. Welcome to Bush's America everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Israel did not murder Rachel Corrie...
This is the kind of inflammatory rhetoric I have learnd to expect from so-called "peace activists" in this forum. Rachel Corrie's death was an unfortunate accident that should never have happened and I don't believe for one minute that the driver of the bulldozer ran over her on purpose. She chose to put herself in harms way knowing that she could be maimed or killed. It was terrible and shouldn't have happened but you can't blame the whole state of Israel who has suffered many losses of her own at the hands of Hamas and other terrorist groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Resistance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. oh I see
A peace activist is murdered, yet the only thing that bothers you is the "inflammatory rhetoric" of those who talk truthfully about it. All the eyewitnesses say the driver intentionally ran over her, yet that just isn't enough for you - because ... you know the driver personally and are seeking to protect him? :shrug: Who knows. Do you have excuses for the murder of Tom Hurndall too? What about Ian Hook? More "unfortunate accidents" I bet. Same with cameraman James Miller?

It was an Israeli military bulldozer which crushed Rachel, therefore, yes it is appopriate to lay the blame on the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 09:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. BTW! If we lived in an earlier time....her death would be an OUTRAGE!
But, with Chimp......nothing is an OUTRAGE...which can't be explained away with the words "terrorist, Kill, Kill, Take 'em Out...Bring 'em On!

So Rachel Corrie was bulldozed and it could have been one of his twins....and she was an American Citizen....and no one cares because she was defending Palestinians....??????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-03 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Orangeone Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. KoKo01 is right

I think that it is similar to what happened during the '60's in America. The white people that helped African Americans were killed too. Arab lifes are not considered as important as Israeli, so anyone helping Palestinians is in danger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Equinox Donating Member (786 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. She dared stand up to the Israeli military machine...
to defend a Palestinian's house. Now she is smeared in all "lefty" publications and the Palestinian was smeared as a terrorist.

The outrage.....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-03 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
36. Gosh
couldn't it be that the most well respected leftist magazine in the US is right and you are missing something?

Can't be...when should we begin praying to you o infallible one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdon326 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-03 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Yang....
dont you know anyone or anything that questions SAINT RACHEL
is obviously a right wing rag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC