Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Israel admits using phosphorus bombs during war in Lebanon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:16 AM
Original message
Israel admits using phosphorus bombs during war in Lebanon
By Meron Rappaport, Haaretz Correspondent

Israel has acknowledged for the first time that it attacked Hezbollah targets during the second Lebanon war with phosphorus shells. White phosphorus causes very painful and often lethal chemical burns to those hit by it, and until recently Israel maintained that it only uses such bombs to mark targets or territory.

The announcement that the Israel Defense Forces had used phosphorus bombs in the war in Lebanon was made by Minister Jacob Edery, in charge of government-Knesset relations. He had been queried on the matter by MK Zahava Gal-On (Meretz-Yahad).

"The IDF holds phosphorus munitions in different forms," Edery said. "The IDF made use of phosphorous shells during the war against Hezbollah in attacks against military targets in open ground."

Edery also pointed out that international law does not forbid the use of phosphorus and that "the IDF used this type of munitions according to the rules of international law."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/777549.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick for humanity
Edited on Sun Oct-22-06 04:22 AM by uppityperson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
2. International law doesn't forbid the use of phosphorus?
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. No
Its pretty nasty stuff, but is not condisdered WMD or chemical weapon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. Wrong.
It is an incendiary weapon and as such is banned from use whenever it might harm civilians. See my other post with the link to the relevant GC protocols. The US has not ratified article III, so if you would like to cling to that excuse, be my guest, however Israel appears to have accepted article III and thus doesn't have this fig leaf to cling to.

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebSign?ReadForm&id=500&ps=P

Here is a DOD analysis explaining why they think it is ok to burn up civilians:

"Accordingly, we recommend that the United States, in accepting the Incendiary Weapons Protocol, reserve the right to use incendiary weapons against military targets located in concentration of civilians where it is judged that such use would cause fewer casualties and less collateral damage than alternative weapons."

For example, Fallujah.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #14
47. yes, thanks
the willful ignorance is so fucking tedious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. From July;
Israel using chemical weapons: doctors

July 27, 2006 - 6:39AM

Lebanon is investigating reports from doctors that Israel has used weapons in its 15-day-old bombardment of southern Lebanon that have caused wounds they have never seen before.

"We are sending off samples tomorrow, but we have no confirmation yet that illegal weapons have been used," Health Minister Mohammed Khalife said.

The Israeli army said it had used only conventional weapons and ammunition in attacks aimed at Hizbollah guerrillas and nothing contravening international law.

Blackened bodies have been showing up at hospitals in southern Lebanon two weeks into the war between Israel and Hizbollah guerrillas that has seen at least 418 people, mostly civilians, killed in Lebanon and at least 42 Israelis.

Killed by Israeli air raids, the Lebanese dead are charred in a way local doctors, who have lived through years of civil war and Israeli occupation, say they have not seen before.

Bachir Cham, a Belgian-Lebanese doctor at the Southern Medical Centre in Sidon, received eight bodies after an Israeli air raid on nearby Rmeili which he said exhibited such wounds.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/World/Israel-using-chemical-weapons-doctors/2006/07/27/1153816285823.html



When rockets and phosphorous cluster
By Meron Rapoport

>snip

At the same time, soldiers are reporting that they fired phosphorous shells, which are supposed to be used by the IDF for marking or setting fire to areas, in order to start fires in Lebanon. The artillery commander says he saw trucks with phosphorous shells en route to artillery batteries in the North.

A direct hit from a phosphorous shell causes severe burns and a painful death. Around a year ago, there was an international scandal after a television crew presented harsh pictures of the charred bodies of Iraqis injured by phosphorous bombs during the course of the American attack on the city of Fallujah.

International law prohibits the use of weapons that cause "excessive damage and unnecessary suffering," and many experts feel that phosphorous is included in this category. The International Red Cross determined that international law prohibits the use of phosphorous against humans. The American "Book of War," published in 1999, which sets down the rules of war for the American army, states: "The ground war law prohibits the use of phosphorous against human targets." The pact on prohibiting or limiting flammable weapons bans the use of phosphorous against civilian targets and against military targets found amid large civil populations.

The IDF Spokesperson said: "International law does not contain a sweeping ban on the use of cluster bombs. The Conventional Weapons Pact does not stipulate a ban on the use of inflammatory weapons (i.e., phosphorous - M.R.), rather it only offers rules for organizing the use of this weapon. For understandable operational reasons, the IDF will not comment on a detailed listing of the weaponry at its disposal. The IDF uses only methods and weapons that are permitted according to international law. The firing of artillery in general, including the firing of artillery to demolish a target, was initiated in response to firing at the State of Israel only." The defense minister's bureau said in response that it had yet to receive an inquiry on the matter of firing cluster rockets.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/761910.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. In previous discussion here and elsewhere it was pointed out
that the symptoms and wound described at at one point in photographs are inconsistent with WP. There has been speculation about microwave and DIME style weapons, but know one really knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #9
49. That "elsewhere".

That wouldn't be Zombietime, would it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. I guess that confirms that we're using them in Iraq, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is documented that they were used in Fallujah. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here is the law.
"Protocol III on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Incendiary Weapons prohibits, in all circumstances, making the civilian population as such, individual civilians or civilian objects, the object of attack by any weapon or munition which is primarily designed to set fire to objects or to cause burn injury to persons through the action of flame, heat or a combination thereof, produced by a chemical reaction of a substance delivered on the target. "
http://www.un.org/millennium/law/xxvi-18-19.htm

Israel is making the less than credible claim that it only used these weapons against military targets. That claim must be viewed with vast skepticism as 1) Israel (given the hugely disproportionate civilian casualty rate) appeared to view the entire population of Lebanon as a military target; 2) the initial reports of the use of chemical weapons came from doctors called to treat civilian casualties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
breakaleg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. Israel apparently did view all Lebanese as either Hezbollah in civilian
clothes or collaborators/ supporters. I find that stance interesting. Aren't most Israeli adults former IDF members and in the reserves? If so, wouldn't they be considered military members not in uniform as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I've made the same point.
The dual standard is stunning. When Hezbollah hit an apartment building it could have made the claim that the residents included IDF soldiers, it didn't make such a justification, but it could have and it would have been as valid as the Israeli justifications for war crimes, which is to say laughable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. WMDs. UN sanctions, anyone? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. For what?
No evidence at this point that war crimes were committed.

- WP is not a considered a chemical weapon or a WMD
- No one is sure what the unusual wounds were caused by

I'm all for a serious investigation, but until something concrete is turned up, claims of war crimes are hyperble and nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. My friend, they admitted to using the White Phosphorus...
Obviously you didn't read the article:
"But last week, Cabinet minister Jacob Edery confirmed during a parliamentary query session that Israel had used the weapons during August fighting against Hezbollah, his spokeswoman, Orly Yehezkel, said. Edery was speaking on behalf of Defense Minister Amir Peretz, she said.

"The Israeli army holds phosphorous munitions in different forms," Haaretz quoted Edery as saying. "The Israeli army made use of phosphorous shells during the war against Hezbollah in attacks against military targets in open ground.""

As to the question about war crimes, you correct there is a debate as to whether WP should be considered a chemical weapon. Because of the fact that it causes damage by the physical property of being incredibly hot, it is considered a physical weapon.

There is a treaty (which I am unsure whether or not Israel is a signatory to) which prevents the use of chemical weapons, but if this is not a chemical weapon it may not be outlawed by that treaty.

The probably should be a treaty to limit the use of WP, since it is a particularly gruesome weapon, comparable to that of actual chemical weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. It is banned when use as an incendiary device.
A wp bomb is a banned weapon. Tracer shells are also wp but are not banned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #15
48. funny how you never get replies from the willfully ignorant
oh, the facts, how they burn. Right to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. It's a war crime if they use it on civilian-heavy target areas.
What matters is where they used it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. Meanwhile...
Lebanese security: 12-year-old killed by cluster bomb in south

<snip>

"A cluster bomb exploded Sunday, killing a 12-year-old boy and wounding his younger brother in a southern Lebanese village, Lebanese security officials said.

Rami Ali Hussein Shibly and his brother, Khodr, 9, where picking olives in their family's grove in Halta when the cluster bomb exploded, said the security officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to the media.

The United Nations and human rights groups have accused Israel of firing as many as 4 million cluster bombs into Lebanon during its 34-day war with the militant group Hezbollah that ended in a UN-brokered cease-fire on August 14."

<snip>

"Sunday's death brings to at least 21 the number of people who have died in cluster bomb explosions in Lebanon since the war ended. More than 100 people have been wounded, according to the UN Mine Action Center."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/777908.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. And the war crimes charges will be made when? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. Israel admits phosphorous bombing
Israel has for the first time admitted it used controversial phosphorous bombs during fighting against Hezbollah in Lebanon in July and August.

Cabinet minister Jacob Edery confirmed the bombs were dropped "against military targets in open ground".

Israel had previously said the weapons were used only to mark targets.

Phosphorus weapons cause chemical burns and the Red Cross and human rights groups say they should be treated as chemical weapons.

The Geneva Conventions ban the use of white phosphorous as an incendiary weapon against civilian populations and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas.

(more)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/6075408.stm



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LordLovesAWorkingMan Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Moral high ground vacated, permanently.
I am a supporter of the state of Israel, but this is cruelty topped with hypocrisy. If anyone, anywhere attacked Israel with such weapons, they would invoke the Holocaust and unleash a horribly disproportionate response.

There is no excuse, none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Sixty years of non-stop war has driven Israel insane....
...a consequence the United States can look forward to if it continues the BushCo and neoconservative policies of non-stop global war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Reminiscent of Fallujah-Why do they hate our freedom?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. from the article:
"The Geneva Conventions ban the use of white phosphorous as an incendiary weapon against civilian populations and in air attacks against military forces in civilian areas."

Oh that's right, the Geneva Conventions are a quaint relict from pre-911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Your tax dollars at work
Bringing democracy to the middle east
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Someone had to say that. Yet we will be accused of not
"minding our own business" and being told "You have no reason to get involved" in this... usual ignorant blather.

It is very important we are concerned about this. It is US policy as much as Israel policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. US Tax dollars at work. It is very important that we end military
aid to any country that uses US military aid to attack civilians.

Israeli Justice Minister Haim Ramon announced on Israeli army radio, "All those in south Lebanon are terrorists who are related in some way to Hezbollah."

There is no doubt this was used to target civilians. Haim Ramon saw anyone in south Lebanon as the enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Fallujah.
http://www.brusselstribunal.org/survey111105.htm
Survey of violations:

1. Crimes of War and Crimes Against Humanity

- First crime:

Some of the ugliest crimes committed by the occupation forces and by Iraqi military units are the ones committed in the city of Fallujah in the battles of November 2004, and which we summarize in the following:

1. The plundering of health care centers and their destruction by bombing as has taken place in the "Taleb Al-Janabi" hospital and in the Central Clinic. Further the Central Hospital was occupied; the staff and everyone in the hospital at that time were arrested. Ambulances in the city have been bombed and the rescue teams were hindered from entering the city, among them the convoy of the Ministry of Health, despite of the fact that more than 50,000 civilians still remained in the city.

2. Internationally prohibited weapons were used in the bombing of the city, such as phosphoric weapons, Napalm, bombs containing unknown gases, causing the blood to explode out of bodies. 24 carbonized bodies have been found in the area of the military neighbourhood. Surviving civilian eyewitnesses stated that the soldiers of the occupation forces entered the area wearing gas masks. Furthermore, cases of deformed newly born increased as a consequence of the use of such weapons. In a press conference, which took place during the battle, Mr. Khaled Al-Sheikhali, official of the Ministry of Health, confirmed the use of such weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
28. The US used it in Iraq too. BUT Bush will NEVER admit it because
HE IS A LIAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. This should have stayed in LBN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. yes it should have n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. There are the written rules and there is what actually happens. n/t
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DrBlix Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. DU Dungeon
Found out awhile back that DU has a 911 dongeon.
This past few days I found out DU has other dongeons, tried to access 300 killed in arsenal attack Iraq.....gone to some dongeon. Then I attempted to access Hastert article about suitcases of money........couldn't get that either.
.
I have to think I am doing something wrong here, though I did search many DU groups looking for them.
.
Oh awhile back there was a "V" For Vendetta thread that had 162 postings "greatest" suddenly that disappeared.
.
Is there so much traffic on DU that these important threads are buried in order to make room for more not so important articles.
.
Oh no silly me please forgive me I've just been reading DU for more than 5 years don't post much and yes I have to admit I'm a bit lacking in knowhow when it comes to posts and topic groups.
.
But it does seem a pity during an election that we have to go digging to get pertinent info to keep up the good fight doesn't it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. the Hastert thread is back w/ diff. links. Check the greatest page.
Edited on Sun Oct-22-06 04:06 PM by elehhhhna
I understand not wanting to carry threads from crazytown or unreliable links but why this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I would like to see that 300 Americans killed thread... tried to but it
Edited on Sun Oct-22-06 04:54 PM by cui bono
was gone. !

Can you tell me where it went or what it was about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. What up with that? So why aren't all the Iraq war threads moved to an
Iraq forum?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. Now I can't recommend this thread? That's a bunch of bull crap!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
40. Israel admits it used phosphorus weapons
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1929007,00.html

Conal Urquhart in Tel Aviv
Monday October 23, 2006
The Guardian


The Israeli government has admitted that it used controversial phosphorus weapons in its attacks against targets during its month long war in Lebanon this summer.
The chemical can be used in shells, missiles and grenades and causes horrific burning when it comes into contact with human flesh.

White phosphorus (WP) weapons are not forbidden by international law but some human rights groups believe they should be re-classified as chemical weapons and banned.

(WP is forbidden from being used in civilian areas or as a weapon)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. US
I don't think the US government has ever admitted it used WP in Fallujah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. yes, it did n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Englander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #42
51. From November '05;
'Iraq probes US phosphorus weapons

>snip

The US has now admitted using white phosphorus as a weapon in Falluja last year, after earlier denying it.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4442156.stm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Kick for the shame of it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TerdlowSmedley Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. Is "Shake 'n' Bake" considered kosher?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sven77 Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-22-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
46. is phosphorus
considered hate speech ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBlix Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #46
50. Is Israel using
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
52. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Stockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
53. Sad disgusted kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
54. Additional link :
However, the third protocol of the Geneva Convention on Conventional Weapons restricts the use of "incendiary weapons," with phosphorus considered to be one such weapon.

Israel and the United States are not signatories to the Third Protocol.

http://www.plenglish.com/article.asp?ID={31AD19FB-D85F-4334-B4CB-40BF8E6A8380})&language=EN

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
55. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-23-06 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
56. But then this is announced....
Haaretz: Poll: 81% of U.S. Jews believe Arabs want to destroy Israel

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?itemNo=777950&contrassID=1&subContrassID=1

Irony...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC