A few months back Hamas had given the impression that they were prepared to talk with Israel and would possibly be prepared to negotiate some type of agreement. Unfortunately, there has been a lot of bad blood developed since then.
However most Palestinians and at least some Israeli leaders do want talks:
_______________________
Polling Data - Palestinian opinion
Do you support the continuation of peace negotiations between the Palestinians and Israel?
Support
67.0%
Oppose
29.7%
No opinion
3.3%
Do you support or oppose a two-state solution based on international declarations?
Support
57.8%
Oppose
39.0%
No opinion
3.2%
Source: Birzeit University Development Studies Programme
Methodology: Interviews with 1,200 Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, conducted from Sept. 14 to Sept. 16, 2006. Margin of error is 3 per cent.
link:
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/13292It should be noted that between 25% to 30% of Palestinians support a single non-ethnic state --- (New York Times, Sept. 14, 2003)
__________________________________
former Israeli Foreign Minister Schlomo Ben-Ami
link:
http://www.democracynow.org/finkelstein-benami.shtml "SHLOMO BEN-AMI: Yes, Hamas. I think that in my view there is almost sort of poetic justice with this victory of Hamas. After all, what is the reason for this nostalgia for Arafat and for the P.L.O.? Did they run the affairs of the Palestinians in a clean way? You mentioned the corruption, the inefficiency. Of course, Israel has contributed a lot to the disintegration of the Palestinian system, no doubt about it, but their leaders failed them. Their leaders betrayed them, and the victory of Hamas is justice being made in many ways. So we cannot preach democracy and then say that those who won are not accepted by us. Either there is democracy or there is no democracy.
And with these people, I think they are much more pragmatic than is normally perceived. In the 1990s, they invented the concept of a temporary settlement with Israel. 1990s was the first time that Hamas spoke about a temporary settlement with Israel. In 2003, they declared unilaterally a truce, and the reason they declared the truce is this, that with Arafat, whose the system of government was one of divide and rule, they were discarded from the political system. Mahmoud Abbas has integrated them into the political system, and this is what brought them to the truce. They are interested in politicizing themselves, in becoming a politic entity. And we need to try and see ways where we can work with them.
Now, everybody says they need first to recognize the state of Israel and end terrorism. Believe me, I would like them to do so today, but they are not going to do that. They are eventually going to do that in the future, but only as part of a quid pro quo, just as the P.L.O. did it. The P.L.O., when Rabin came to negotiate with them, also didn't recognize the state of Israel, and they engaged in all kind of nasty practices. And therefore, we need to be much more realistic and abandon worn-out cliches and see whether we can reach something with these people. I believe that a long-term interim agreement between Israel and Hamas, even if it is not directly negotiated between the parties, but through a third party, is feasible and possible."
__________
BTW: I got the Haaretz newsletter this AM too ;)