Facing stone-throwing, the IDF cries “popular terror” and lets slip the dogs of war

[ProgressiveMuslim]

April 11, 2010 Didi Remez Leave a comment Go to comments

An Israeli army dog attacks a Palestinian woman during an army raid in the West Bank village of Obadiyah, near Bethlehem, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. The dog, which was supposed to enter a house with troops searching for a wanted militant attacked the female bystander instead. The woman received medical attention from the troops on the scene. (AP Photo/Kevin Frayer)

A minimal sense of sense of history appears to have become an unrealistic expectation when it comes to Israeli policy makers. Some things should not be done, period. No matter how effective they are. But if Jewish leaders can propose labor camps for refugees, why not use dogs against civilians?

The newly coined term, “popular terror,” may indicate, however, that the IDF is concerned that some Israeli audiences, perhaps even some soldiers, would still be upset at the prospect. What better way to dehumanize a teenager throwing stones at soldiers blocking a protest against theft of communal land than to label him a “terrorist”?


read on...
http://coteret.com/2010/04/11/facing-stone-throwing-the-idf-cries-popular-terror-and-lets-slip-the-dogs-of-war/

[PCIntern]

1. "...use dogs against civilians" ?

But the troops cared for her at the scene...in fact Israel treats its sworn enemies with life-saving surgeries all the time and even treats their children for conditions arising from birth defects and the like.

Your statement is unwarranted...

[ProgressiveMuslim]

2. You read correctly. Sic-cing dogs on kids. Beats shooting them, I suppose?

[ProgressiveProfessor]

3. Was it on command or did the dog react based on actions being taken

Article has assumptions, but little more. Also consider the muslim attitude towards dogs and whether or not the story is playing into it.

[Violet_Crumble]

4. It's a bit disturbing how you managed to turn that into being about Muslims...

It's a bit creepy in the same creepy way as when someone appears in a thread and out of the blue starts going on about Jews....

Those who bother to click on the link can see that the article has more than assumptions.