Palestinian Police Face the Enemy Within

[papau]

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-security23jan23.story
Palestinian Police Face the Enemy Within
By Laura King
Times Staff Writer

January 23, 2005

GAZA CITY — Abu Salim, an earnest, cleanshaven young Palestinian police sergeant, says he joined the force to protect and serve his people. His elder brother shares those goals, he says.

But his brother is a fugitive member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, a Palestinian militant group responsible for hundreds of deadly attacks against Israelis. And Abu Salim says that if he were called upon to arrest his sibling or other wanted men, he would refuse.

The 35,000-strong Palestinian security forces are supposed to be the centerpiece of a bold attempt by the new Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, to quell attacks by groups such as Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade, which for more than four years have waged a relentless war on Israel.

Although violence ebbed after Abbas sent his officers into the streets last week, enormous obstacles stand in the way of his plan to harness a security force that has little real sense of its priorities, let alone its loyalties.

Made up of no fewer than 13 branches, the Palestinian security services are riddled with internal rivalries and beset by disorganization. They are short on weapons and equipment, with ranks thinned, bases destroyed and morale sapped by a conflict in which many find themselves unwitting combatants.

Like Abu Salim, who did not want his full name used, many members of the security services feel a kinship with the militants, regardless of whether they are literally family. The Palestinian security forces, created under the Oslo interim peace accords of the early 1990s, were conceived as a means of providing respectable employment to young street fighters who had cut their teeth in the first Palestinian uprising, from 1987 to 1993.<snip>

[Igel]

1. And if everybody during the US Civil War had

decided not to fight their erstwhile compatriots (be they brothers or not), I suspect that the civil war would have turned out a bit differently.

House divided and all that.

[papau]

2. Is there a civil war -or just folks that refuse to agree to the peace that

the vast majority want?

[Igel]

3. No civil war.

It's a question of organization and number. And commotment.

I personally think that they've taken great pains to avoid one. It may yield good results, but at the price of years of turmoil and thousands of deaths.