POPULATION CONTROL. Are you scared yet? Do a search

[JAYJDF]

on this topic and there is way too much information that will scare the pants off of you.

We sit here and worry about the small things that we see that can affect us, but none of that compares to what is being accomplished by many countries to control the Earth's population.

Here's just a couple items with references so you can finish scaring yourself if you choose. Scarier than any horror flick!


http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/populationcontrolagenda2.htm

1945-1955 Much of the original proof that fluoride is safe for humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists who had been secretly ordered to provide "evidence useful in litigation" against defense contractors for fluoride injury to citizens. The first lawsuits against the American A-bomb program were not over radiation, but over fluoride damage, the documents show. Human studies were required. Bomb program researchers played a leading role in the design and implementation of the most extensive US study of the health effects of fluoridating public drinking water, conducted in Newburgh, New York, from 1945 to 1955. Then, in a classified operation code-named "Program F", they secretly gathered and analyzed blood and tissue samples from Newburgh citizens with the cooperation of New York State Health Department personnel. The original, secret version (obtained by these reporters) of a study published by Program F scientists in the August 1948 Journal of the American Dental Association1 shows that evidence of adverse health effects from fluoride was censored by the US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)-considered the most powerful of Cold War agencies-for reasons of "national security". The bomb program's fluoride safety studies were conducted at the University of Rochester-site of one of the most notorious human radiation experiments of the Cold War, in which unsuspecting hospital patients were injected with toxic doses of radioactive plutonium. The fluoride studies were conducted with the same ethical mindset, in which "national security" was paramount. http://www.nexusmagazine.com/

On October 5, 1976, just as the so-called "SWINE FLU" inoculation program was getting under way, news reports suddenly told us that we were experiencing fallout from an alleged Chinese atmospheric nuclear blast on September 26. Oddly enough, the initial reports about this came from the East Coast, especially Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut; but certain areas of the Pacific Northwest were soon mentioned as being affected too. We were told that radioactive iodine-131 was showing up in milk at various locations; but we were also assured, as we invariably are whenever any radioactive hazard appears, that there was really no danger. In the days that followed we continued to hear about the supposed Chinese fallout, but other things probably seemed even more worrisome. For example, elderly people began dying of heart attacks shortly after taking swine flu shots, causing widespread alarm at first. But the Government quickly assured us that their deaths didn't really matter at all, that they would have died anyway; and the swine flu inoculation program went right back into high gear. Dr. Peter Beter


http://www.schillerinstitute.org/food_for_peace/kiss_nssm_jb_1995.html

On Dec. 10, 1974, the U.S. National Security Council under Henry Kissinger completed a classified 200-page study, "National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests." The study falsely claimed that population growth in the so-called Lesser Developed Countries (LDCs) was a grave threat to U.S. national security. Adopted as official policy in November 1975 by President Gerald Ford, NSSM 200 outlined a covert plan to reduce population growth in those countries through birth control, and also, implicitly, war and famine. Brent Scowcroft, who had by then replaced Kissinger as national security adviser (the same post Scowcroft was to hold in the Bush administration), was put in charge of implementing the plan. CIA Director George Bush was ordered to assist Scowcroft, as were the secretaries of state, treasury, defense, and agriculture.

[The Deacon]

1. What?

No pictures of the Grassy Knoll or radar tapes of a US Navy guided missle destroyer shooting down TWA 800?

[JAYJDF]

7. Ah, a trusting soul.

Guess you also believe EVERYTHING the gov has told us about 911.

Go back to sleep.

[Name removed]

9. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Xeric]

2. A real crackpot site

Robert Howard is a nut.
The site is filled with goofy Illuminati conspiracy theories.
The pope is the anti-christ. Fluoridation is a mind control plot by the Masons, etc. etc.
It's for the seriously gullible.

[Xeric]

5. Oh and...

The Schiller Institute is a front for the LaRouchies. LaRouche is one of the more remarkable loons of our time.

[fordnut]

3. Another sign of population control will come

when they start drafting old farts like me

[icymist]

4. The black helicopters are coming to steal our precious bodily fluids!

eom

[nickinSTL]

6. P-O-E

:tinfoilhat:

[ComerPerro]

8. I only drink grain alcohol and rainwater

[earth mom]

10. Look no further than Katrina.

Except not enough people died on that one. :sarcasm:

Forget about the naysayers, because there is NO DOUBT that the PTB don't give a rats ass about the rest of us peons and the sooner we are gone, the better. BASTARDS! :mad:

[Ron Green]

11. .

:tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:

[Bushwick Bill]

12. Laugh all you want...

but I wouldn't doubt that some elites have depopulation on the agenda in a world of declining energy supplies and climate change. Don't forget PNAC's fascination with bioweapons that target specific genotypes. Here are some thoughts from the Pentagon.

APRIL 13, 2004 0800 PST (FTW) – In October of 2003, the Pentagon published a report on abrupt climate change.1 Its authors were by Peter Schwartz, a CIA consultant and former head of planning at the Royal Dutch/Shell Group, and Doug Randall of the California-based Global Business Network.2 Their task was to assess the likelihood of abrupt climate change within the next twenty years. They were then supposed to develop a scenario of the possible consequences should abrupt climate change occur starting in 2004. Finally, they were to make recommendations to the President based on their study: An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security.

A few copies were printed and circulated around the Pentagon, which heavily censored the report and is now downplaying its significance.3 It remained effectively buried and all but forgotten until copies were leaked to the media, first to Fortune Magazine,4 and then to The Observer.5 The Pentagon has rightfully pointed out that this is a speculative report; they are not expecting abrupt climate change to begin in the year 2004. Schwartz and Randall are exploring a risk scenario, such as the Pentagon and the CIA draw up all the time – what would happen if the Russians launched a nuclear attack this year; what would happen if California suffered the big one, etc. But the real importance of the report lies in the statement of probability and in the authors' recommendations to the President and the National Security Council.

While no statistical analysis of probability is given in the report as it has been released (any such statistical analysis would most likely be classified), the authors state that “the plausibility of severe and rapid climate change is higher than most of the scientific community and perhaps all of the political community is prepared for.”6 They say that instead of asking whether this could happen, we should be asking when this will happen. They conclude: “It is quite plausible that within a decade the evidence of an imminent abrupt climate shift may become clear and reliable.”7

From such a shift, the report claims, utterly appalling ecological consequences would follow. Europe and Eastern North America would plunge into a mini-ice age, with weather patterns resembling present day Siberia. Violent storms could wreak havoc around the globe. Coastal areas such as The Netherlands, New York, and the West coast of North America could become uninhabitable, while most island nations could be completely submerged. Lowlands like Bangladesh could be permanently swamped. While flooding would become the rule along coastlines, mega-droughts could destroy the world's breadbaskets. The dust bowl could return to America's Midwest. Famine and drought would result in a major drop in the planet's ability to sustain the present human population. Access to water could become a major battleground – hundreds of millions could die as a result of famine and resource wars. More than 400 million people in subtropical regions will be put at grave risk. There would be mass migrations of climate refugees, particularly to southern Europe and North America. Nuclear arms proliferation in conjunction with resource wars could very well lead to nuclear wars.8 And none of this takes into account the effects of global peak oil and the North American natural gas cliff. Not pretty.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1153513,00.html
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/041304_climate_change_pt1.html

Here are some fun sites for your perusal.
http://www.dieoff.org/
http://www.eroei.com/solutions/population.html