Here is the BBC story relied upon in the C-Span panel on the 9/11 Truth:

[originalpckelly]

"Another of the men named by the FBI as a hijacker in the suicide attacks on Washington and New York has turned up alive and well.

The identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.

Saudi Arabian pilot Waleed Al Shehri was one of five men that the FBI said had deliberately crashed American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Centre on 11 September.

His photograph was released, and has since appeared in newspapers and on television around the world.

Now he is protesting his innocence from Casablanca, Morocco."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1559151.stm

I am neutral on this, but here is the story. It appears to check out.

[petgoat]

1. AFAIK BBC never retracted it. nt

[wildbilln864]

2. The government has yet to show any credible

evidence to tie anyone to the 911 event!
Show it to me!?

[petgoat]

3. W's attitude is "Evidence? We don't need no steenking evidence!

Do you think this is a namby pamby courtroom? This is war!"

[FourScore]

6. Funny.

Too bad it's true.

[mirandapriestly]

4. It's very odd

Also, the phony way their id's were found and that supposedly their names were not released from the coroner for flight 77 because no one claimed them. But why would no one claim them?

[John Q. Citizen]

5. Yes, and also the fact that 5 years later Osama still hasn't

been indicted for complicity in 911.

He was indicted for the USS Cole, he was indicted for the African embassy bombings, yet still no indictment for 9/11. This is inexcusable, unless there is no good evidence to tie him to the crime.