Addressing the central role of media in fabricating the 9/11 hoax

[theSaiGirl]

August 13th, 2006 - 7 PM EST
911tvfakery.blogspot.com at St.Mark's/ny911truth
Presented by Nico Haupt aka ewing2001
http://911closeup.com/nico/911bio.html

What is "9/11TVFakery"?

Some have argued that it is a self-defeating neurosis crippling the 9/11 movement ever, or sheer "insanity".

Ohers think it is the ultimate 'Holy Grail', insuring against any kind of "limited hangout" on 9/11.

It is by now a documented and casually accepted fact of life, that U.S. corporate media (and often its government source) regularly fabricates and doctors video, photos, stories .... every single day;
but on 9/11 .... we can believe that they were honest and truthful with us.
????
The findings of "9/11TVFakery" show that live and non-live footage
of the second attack on the South Tower did not include a real aircraft
and therefore contradict the official fantasy of 9/11.

One wonders, that this should be enough to make a case,but the majority of 9/11 activist leaders seems to be afraid of confronting this ?
Why?

But "9/11 TV Fakery Video Researchers" are not even alone.
There are also so called "no planers", who have focussed on forensic evidence which allowed only one clear conclusion as well:
No 7x7 hit the South Tower.
Nothing like a Boeing commercial jet...

However the "no-planers" are getting harrassed, threatened, ignored or insulted for over 4 years, only for trying desperately to separate their evidence from Disinfo ("Pods"), mis-representations("holograms") and inconsistencies ("remote controlled planes").

'9/11TVFakery' is a clean and systematic attempt to satisfy all groups; even showing how important the fakery was for the controlled demolitions.
Yet.... this point of view is still not getting a fair hearing.

On Sunday, August 13th the audience of ny911truth.org will have a chance to hear the real history of this research, which is (no matter what many claim) is already 5 years old (!).
The audience will have the opportunity to analyse the relevant footage as well, in most cases in its original quality.

So far, everyone who analysed this footage came to the same conclusion:
There WAS hoax, fakery, sheer electronic brainwashing... by the networks.

U.S. Media was part of the 9/11 Inside Job.
A military camera system called WESCAM was part of the false-flag op.
This is only one of the facts that is suppressed or ignored in wilfull denial.
So that now the "9/11 truth movement" itself, is vulnerable to accusations of practices variously described as as "orwellian", "gatekeeping" and "infiltrated".

A petition of this research and activism around the media fakery of 9/11 is now posted at the "9/11 Scholars for Truth" site.
Eleven 9/11Scholars heve signed it so far.
http://www.petitiononline.com/911tvfak/petition.html

The complete story of 9/11 has not yet been told.
911tvfakery.blogspot, proceeding the investigative school of team8plus.org
is making a difference and will continue to do so.

[dailykoff]

1. I tend to agree.

There's an awful lot of evidence suggesting that the WTC plane shots were faked at the time and continue to be.

For one thing most witnesses seem to have heard the crash and seen the fireball, but unless they have some outlandish story like seeing faces in the cockpit, didn't actually see the collision.

And then there's the video footage, which is remarkably scarce and has always looked fake, and the stills, which also look fake.

[Artdyst]

2. The same is true with regards to the Pentagon

"There's an awful lot of evidence suggesting that the WTC plane shots were faked at the time and continue to be."

One of the best, if not THE best sources of information and intelligent conjecture about happened at the Pentagon is killtown's web site. It contains an amazing amount of information that is so hard to refute, no one even tries. Instead, all you hear from the Bush CT'ers is attempts to smear the messenger. The good thing about THAT little tactic is that the very powerful MESSAGE seems that much more likely to be true.

[Make7]

3. Be sure to sign the petition!

To: Scholars for 9/11 Truth

Petition to Scholars for 9/11 Truth to release a scientific paper at journalof911studies.com to inform the public on the findings of "9/11TVfakery"/"no planes-forensic evidence".

We the undersigned demand the release of a paper at the new website of 9/11 Scholars.

This paper, currently prepared by 9/11 Scholar members, will point out on the evidence of manipulated live- and not live produced footage of the second attack on the South Tower (September 11, 2001).

The findings will present, whether the TV Broadcast was fabricated and manipulated and obviously did not include a real commercial plane, but a graphic computer generated "aircraft silhouette", inserted into the footage.

We urge a public debate on these findings which also support the forensic evidence against commercial aircraft having crashed into the South Tower.

We also explain, why these findings support the evidence of controlled demolition regarding North Tower and South Tower.

The public should be informed on this evidence and come to their own conclusion, which should not be dictated by any public 9/11 activist group.

So far the importance of these findings was recently expressed by several 9/11 scholars, not necessarily connected to any public PR campaign or research on that matter:

   1 Alexander L. Dent
   2 David Gabbard
   3 Michael Morrissey
   4 Morgan Reynolds
   5 Morgan Stack
   6 Webster Griffin Tarpley
   7 Judy Wood
   8 Fred Burk (undecided)
   9 Alex Floum
   10 Cathy Garger (undecided)
   11 John Leonard (undecided)
   12 Brad Mayeux
   13 Peter Meyer
   14 Rick Siegel
   15 Rick Rajter
   16 Veronica Chapman

We the undersigned furthermore demand that the public should urge pressure on U.S. Television Networks, including ABC7, FOX 5 (which provided the only known live available feed) to release unedited, uncropped and unaltered footage from the second attack, including the names of all connected camera operators and helicopter pilots.

http://www.petitiononline.com/911tvfak/petition.html

Check out some of the people that have signed already:

   1. Nico Haupt
   4. Rosalee Grable
   11. gerard Holmgren

The petition is only up to 80 signatures - they need everyone's help.

- Make7

[DoYouEverWonder]

4. Can you tell me any more about this WESCAM system?

This is the first I've heard of it. Thanks.

[mirandapriestly]

5. Here is footage from that morning

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xMucVeew8eg
sorry I can't give you the time where the wescam camera show up, but it is what was used to photograph the planes on 9-11,the first footage (impacts) you can see it pop up and see the name on the camera. What's interesting about it is it is what is used by the military. (it is also capable of making much higher quality photos than what we have seen).

[Grateful for Hope]

6. "I never saw a plane like that before"

Interesting eyewitness account of 1st hit.

[mirandapriestly]

7. here is a transcript

http://s3.amazonaws.com/911timeline/2001/abcnews091101.html

they all contradict each other somewhat. What is funny is when the reporter at his apartment does not see a plane but only sees the explosion, then then Gibson has to tell him that Yeah, there is a plane I can see it on tv! It turns out he was watching 4 blocks from the north, though, but still you would think he would have noticed a plane. He sort of changes his story to fit in with what he is supposed to say, I think. The guy at the end describing the "plane" - makes you wonder doesn't it? He is the only one who did not work for ABC.

[Grateful for Hope]

8. I could understand the reporter's confusion

since his attention was on the tower already hit -- and, on the noise of fire trucks, etc. But, I did find what the witness said very interesting indeed.

[mirandapriestly]

9. yes. I wonder if "no planes" is a distraction for

"weird kind of plane that you've never seen before", lol, I wish he had described more.

[mirandapriestly]

10. Nico's page on Wescam

http://www.911closeup.com/nico/WABC_cam_identification.html