Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sinister connections to a possible future 'terrorist' attack....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:05 AM
Original message
Sinister connections to a possible future 'terrorist' attack....
A few days ago I saw Lawrence Eagleberger on cable TV talking about the threat that Tehran poses visa vis nuclear weapons. He said something to the effect that the Russians have to take the threat of terrorists of getting a hold of a warhead and laying waste to one of their major cities seriously.

Going back a little further in time I seem to recall a report that Dick Cheney had requested the Pentagon to draw up a plan in response to a future 9-11 type attack orchestrated by... you guessed it, Iran!

Yesterday, I came across an interesting paragraph from "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert. The very first paragraph on page 70 states...

"Of all American companies dealing directly with the US military and providing cover for CIA operations, few firms can match the global presence of this giant construction powerhouse which employs 20,000 people in more than 100 countries. Through its sister companies or joint ventures, Brown and Root can build offshore oil rigs, drill wells, construct and operate everything from harbors to pipelines to nuclear reactors... One key beacon of Brown and Root's overwhelming appeal to agencies like the CIA is that, from its own corpoorate web page, it proudly announces that is has received the contract to dismantle aging Russian nuclear tipped ICBMs in their silos."

Finally, there was a fairly recent report that Dick Cheney was having a huge underground bunker built under his newly purhased home. My simple question to Mr Cheney is, "What do you know that the rest of us simple folk don't?".

Whether this will lead to an October surprise in '06 or '08 is anyone's guess. If a 'terrorist' nuke goes off in October '08, I wouldn't be surprised to see martial law imposed and the presidential election put on perpetual hold.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd count on it
if you had the world's best bunkers and supplies, and had to choose between that or the Hague, what would you chose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ninkasi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. If I had led a life as full of treachery and corruption as Cheney
I would probably be building a bunker, too. He has destroyed enough lives, careers, and reputations to make him scared. He did not get to be the man running the country without committing a few despicable acts. As for orchestrating another attack on U.S. soil to either save the republican party, or drum up another war, there is no act so vile that he would be unwilling to commit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. The attack wouldn't even have to happen on U.S. soil.
The main criteria would be the PR value of such an attack, as well as, how well they could pin the attack on whomever they wanted to pin it on. These criteria start to narrow things down a bit, since a 'terrorist-nuclear-attack' on Port Moresby (Papua New Guinea) would serve a different purpose than one on say, Paris, or, Toronto for that matter.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. A Dem majority would be absolutely disastrous for Cheney
And his thugs. I have no doubt that they'd do absolutely anything, and I do mean anything, to stop that from happening. People are catching on to stealing elections so they can only do SO MUCH without it becoming glaringly obvious. What other options do they have left? The scare campaign is already in full swing but I have no doubt they have more up their sleeves before November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stardust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Is Brown and Root a subsidiary of Halliburton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Halliburton and Brown & Root
Edited on Sat Aug-26-06 01:56 AM by guruoo


Halliburton and Brown & Root
Halliburton grew from the risk-taking entrepreneurialism of Erle P. Halliburton, who established the New Method Oil Well Cementing Company in Oklahoma in 1919. Simultaneously, the Brown brothers, George and Herman, partnered with their brother-in-law, Dan Root, to found Brown & Root in Texas.

By Erle Halliburton's death in 1957, the Company had 201 offices in 22 states and 20 foreign countries. Five years later, Halliburton acquired Brown & Root following Herman Brown's death. At the time, Brown & Root was renowned as a road construction company, general contractor and builder of the world's first offshore platform in 1947.
http://www.halliburton.com/about/history_entrep.jsp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrushTheDLC Donating Member (448 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Brown Brothers. As in Brown Brothers - Harriman
As in the business partners of Prescott Bush. It never leaves the inner circle with these traitorous bastards, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazz2006 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 05:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. Hmm. Truthiness seekers working for Halliburton companies?
The latest truthiness seeker the "scholars" are touting is a Brown & Root alumni.

I'm referring to the guy that Fetzer has been espousing for the past couple of days, what's his name?

Found it... Charles Pegelow, who is allegedly a structural engineer, although the evidence of same remains a bit sketchy at this point.

Sketchiness aside, doesn't working for Halliburton companies automatically preclude one from being in the good books of the truthiness seekers and automatically make one a government shill?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. It would be an American city to make absolutely certain
the population were too terrified for clear thinkers to get a message across.

The question is, which city would the GOP prefer to hit, and why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JesterCS Donating Member (627 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-26-06 03:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. well.
i would say somewhere close to an entry into the US. Too far inland would raise suspicion as an inside job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC