Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Morgan Reynolds Endorses the Onion's "Single-Plane" Theory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Brainster Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 03:32 PM
Original message
Morgan Reynolds Endorses the Onion's "Single-Plane" Theory
And explains how the "fake" plane into WTC 2 could have been done.

Here is more food for thought: the same chameleon plane could have appeared at all three events: 9:03a at WTC 2, 9:32-9:37a at the Pentagon, and 10:06a at Shanksville, PA. In truth, the perps only needed the disappearing plane trick at WTC 2 but it is a promising possibility for Shanksville too. The Pentagon event did not really need an airliner but the single plane theory proposed this month as a parody of the JFK single-bullet theory actually might make sense! The same disappearing act by the same secret plane could have been used at all three locations! We shall see if future work bears any of this out.


Okay, Reynolds clearly is nuttier than a Blue Diamond warehouse.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwtravel Donating Member (42 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's he smoking? I don't want any of it.
Jeez. That's a lot of complicated stuff going on. Hypotheses like this remind me of the Mafia Theory on Conspiracies; the best conspiracies are where only 1 person knows! People eventually talk. It's not in our nature to keep secrets forever. I think 5 years is enough time for someone to have spilled some of the beans. Someone from the "complicit media" sharing it with their spouse during pillow talk, someone from Boeing letting out the fact that they aren't missing any planes during a night of drinking?
Besides, there is a very good amateur video of the first tower hit and there are multiple films of the second hit. Nothing I've seen in ANY of those videos makes me think for 1 second that planes didn't hit those towers.
Mr. Reynolds uses some unsubstantiated superlative words in his prose; he says "physically impossible" 2 or 3 times with no substance, "too fast to be natural" is strictly opinion and not fact, "impossible crash physics" strictly his opinion, and his argument that this "background tinted plane" makes more sense than holography, a long established science?
In my opinion, it's a lot less of a stretch to accept that real planes got hijacked and crashed into buildings. The element of surprise is EXACTLY what made it possible. The model that had been followed until that moment was to do what the hijackers say and everyone will be alright. The model failed because some radical freaks were willing to go one step further than we could imagine. Our bloated government agencies failed because while they thought they were prepared, it was only on paper. The real thing exposed the truth; the right and left arms were not connected to the same "brain". The same sort of confusion, albeit with vastly less consequence, happens every day in many large, bloated, plump bureaucracies, business or government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Morgan Reynolds...
Former member of the BUSH administration...

God-sent red-herring for the OCT crowd to fish up.

Nothing more to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You're talking like nobody in the CT crowd
believes it. One thing you and I have in common is that we both wish nobody believed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I was skeptical of his claims that the perimeter columns were
bent outward and that the hole did not match the planes' wingspan.

And I was surprised when the Scholars embraced him.

But remember the CIA has been drugging people's drinks for
decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-28-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Total bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generarth Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-29-06 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Morgan - is that a silent 'g'?
Edited on Tue Aug-29-06 01:30 AM by Generarth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC