Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LOL. (so called)Pilots for truth can't handle the truth!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-10-06 09:01 PM
Original message
LOL. (so called)Pilots for truth can't handle the truth!
Edited on Sun Sep-10-06 09:11 PM by Kingshakabobo
I have posted several links on the Youtube thread questioning the, so called, pilot's assertion that the altimeter reading was too high to hit the light-poles during the pentagon strike.

Poof! They disappear. Mine weren't the only posts to disappear. Another poster posted links and they too went down the hole. At fist, I thought maybe I made a mistake and didn't post correctly so I tried again. Same result - gone in one hour. Then again - POOF - gone. I noticed the other guy's posts disappeared - so did his question about where his posts went. Funny thing - I went on "the pilots for truth" website and, from what I can tell, they censor pilots that don't agree with them - For instance - When confronted by a poster named "driver" about the admin's calculation errors the admin threatened to ban him. (I have seen Driver on other non-controversial websites and know him to be credible - a big name commercial carrier pilot)

VERY INTERESTING

I'm curious how that is done. My guess is the CTer and his minions flag it as spam??? That's my only guess......Oh no! now I'M a conspiracy theorist!

-----------------------------------------------

The bottom line is, the poster is wrong to say the airplane was absolutely positively too high when it struck. It's quite possible the altimeter was affected by Hysteresis Error due to rapid descent - how much would Hysteresis Error affect the altimeter in this particular situation? I'm not sure but we know there is an effect - especially during a rapid descent. BTW, this is why the big airlines rely on their radio/radar altimeters when landing because they are much more accurate than the pressure altimeter. The info I've obtained say the jetliner's pressure altimeters are more accurate than general aviation but I am reading there is STILL a lag/error.

Here is some of what I posted:


http://www.tpub.com/content/aviation/14030/css/14030_45.htm

Hysteresis Error.— Hysteresis error is a lag in altitude indication due to the elastic properties of the material within the altimeter. This occurs after an aircraft has maintained a constant altitude for an extended period of time and then makes a large, rapid altitude change. After a rapid descent, altimeter readings are higher than actual. This error is negligible during climbs and descent at a slow rate or after maintaining a new altitude for a short period of time.


HYSTERESIS:

Hysteresis results from the imperfect elasticity of aneroid capsules and springs which tend to retain a given shape even though the external forces have changed. It is present during rapid altitude changes and for a short duration thereafter. Hysteresis affects pressure altimeters.

REVERSAL ERROR:

Reversal error results from induced false static pressure sensations caused by large or abrupt pitch changes which give a momentary indication in the opposite direction. It affects pressure altimeters and vertical-speed indicators.




Edit to add:

This is what the poster initially says:

>>>>>Baro altimeters don't "lag". They use that rule of thumb as a "merging lane". Just like you merge onto a highway, you have to merge into your altitude. You cant just stop automatically at your altitude. Please read the Flight Information Handbook by the FAA. You're confusing merging with lagging.<<<<<

Then, caught in an inaccuracy. With links:

>>>This lag is only apparent in abrupt changes from level attitudes. As flight instructors point out to their students. Lag is negligible once established in a descent as AA77 was.<<<



youtube link:

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=DzR-q0ijbV0&fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DDzR-q0ijbV0










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're starting to sound paranoid there, King Shaka - careful ;) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. I understand. Conspiracy theorists are out to get me as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FoxOnTheRun Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ì heard the guy giving an interview on the Jack Blood show
he didn't want to give his name, sounded somewhat suspicious.

Maybe the group was setup purposely to drive people into the boring question what hit the pentagon.

I've also heard an interview by Sam Danner I believe who says something smaller hit the pentagon and he says the light poles popped out by themselves after the plane went past(explosives) He could be disinfo, he also was at Eric Hufschmidt's show, who is definitely disinfo


I don't know what to believe, I think we would have heard more eyewitnesses if there was something fishy at the pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-11-06 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Don't these theories get crazier by the minute?
Now the LIGHT-POLES had explosives planted in them? sheesh!

He does sound suspicious. Also, his original Youtube profile had his age at 26yrs old.....with 20 years flight experience. Perhaps he was one of them there whatcha call "child prodigies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-12-06 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. Nowwwww I get it! You can remove comments from your own video!
Edited on Tue Sep-12-06 01:54 PM by Kingshakabobo
The, so called, "pilot for truth" doesn't want anyone to see actual facts which contradict his inaccurate conclusion that the aircraft was too high.

Once again:

Hysteresis Error.— Hysteresis error is a lag in altitude indication due to the elastic properties of the material within the altimeter. This occurs after an aircraft has maintained a constant altitude for an extended period of time and then makes a large, rapid altitude change. After a rapid descent, altimeter readings are higher than actual. This error is negligible during climbs and descent at a slow rate or after maintaining a new altitude for a short period of time.

What is so controversial that he doesn't want this posted? Oh, I see. It directly contradicts his assertion that "baro altimeters don't lag."....WRONG


edit add:

From Youtube

How do I remove a comment?

You have the ability to remove comments from your own videos. To do this:

1. Watch the video with the comment you would like to remove.

2. Click the button beneath the video that says "View All Comments"

3. Locate the comment that you would like to remove.

4. Click the 'remove comment' button beneath the comment.

5. You can also change how comments are posted to each of you videos. If you edit the properties for each video, you have the option to approve all comments, require approval for each comment, or block all comments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC