The President's legendary view of the alleged First Hit ....

[theSaiGirl]

Our thanks to Dave over at 911blimp, for this great evidence against either Bush ... or someone who was manipulating him ... or both.

This probably incriminates Bush; even if he was shown a specially produced video in his limo on the way to the Booker School, he would still have to be enabling a monstrous lie about 9/11.

On the other hand, he could have made the whole lie up.

But the real question is this: Where are the thousands of reporters, camera and video techs, producers, graduates of journalism schools,
of whom one might think
... they would be demanding to see the video of what the President claims he saw that morning...

Did even the official Kean-Hamilton dog-and-pony show get to see what the President "saw" .. or said he saw that morning on his way to the Booker School to read about pet goats.

Just like one might expect the media people to have demanded, via FOIA requests at least, to see the airport security cam videos from Logan, Dulles or Newark; in order that we might actually catch a glimpse of the mythic Muslim "hijackers", with their box cutters safely ensconced, actually boarding the planes they are supposed to have hijacked that morning.
These are the classic Sherlock Holmes dogs that don't bark.
A compliant good-German corporate media.
A flickering neon-lit highway of whores.
Where are those thousands of media heroes ?

THAT is the question that any real 9/11 justice movement should be putting out front, for their degenerate and cowardly couch-potato(e) audience to contemplate.

Check out the link to the formal denial of release (of what Bush says he watched) from the indictable co-conspirator (RICO, obstruction of justice, misprision of treason) Craig Wayne Smith, the corrupt General Counsel who is now making himself an accessory after the fact:

http://911blimp.net/aud_BushImplicatesBush.shtml

[Mnemosyne]

1. Thank you for this link theSaiGirl. I've been

looking for it!

I heard him say it the first time. It has driven me nuts ever since.

I imagine Darth Cheney, et al, were messing their pants when * said that.

I keep hoping for a drunken coke-head meltdown on national tv. * is their weakest link.:evilgrin:

[tenseconds]

2. security stripped?

I've often wondered if Bush didn't have foreknowlege of the first target but wasn't privy to the rest of the operation.

I remember a video clip of Bush in the Oval Office I saw the next day on 9-12. He seemed to be genuinely pissed off and of course this was directed towards Osama bin Laden and AlQaeda. But I had this feeling that while he was doing his bin Laden rant that his anger was really directed towards the plotters that had set him up.

Webster Tarpley has reminded us that Bush had no military escort taking off from the the Saratoga airport and continued to have none for 45 minutes? He suggests that Bush was security stripped while at Booker T. And then there is the purported message he received on the Air Force One that "Angel is next".... meaning...you play it our way or face the consequences.