malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 06:12 AM
Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-31-06 07:00 AM by malaise
|
| sweetpotato
(678 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 06:15 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. You mean Flight 93, right? |
|
So Rummy admitted shooting it down. Figures.
|
| China_cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Admits to shooting it down? |
|
Or just wants to take away the hero status that's been given to the passengers of that flight? I wouldn't put that past him.
|
| malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
corrected. I shouldn't post before coffee
|
| madokie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 06:22 AM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Lots and lots of criminal behavior in our whitehouse |
| onethatcares
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 06:50 AM
Response to Original message |
| 4. can't get it to load if I c&p the site. |
|
is it gone? I get a bad url. I could really use this one. What am I doing wrong?
|
| malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| City Lights
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 06:59 AM
Response to Original message |
| 5. It sounds like he's lumping the shoot down of Flight 93 in with |
|
other terrorist acts. Is he saying terrorists shot down Flight 93? :shrug:
|
| malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
| crikkett
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
that's from years ago (or at least months)
|
| davekriss
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |
| originalpckelly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 08:24 AM
Response to Original message |
| 11. Okay actually, this isn't the usual conspiracy bullshit... |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-31-06 08:30 AM by originalpckelly
very probably they did shoot it down but didn't want to say so.
|
| savemefromdumbya
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-16-06 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
| 13. can say so now since Rummy has gone |
| bushatbooker
(227 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-31-06 02:48 PM
Response to Original message |
| 12. Why does this matter? No 757 crashed in Shanksville |
| Clinton Crusader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-06-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
| 14. Watched The Flight That Fought Back |
|
last evening.
I didn't know that 'supposedly' this plane went in inverted. Just didn't know that. Here's the thing -they had a guy who was working outside nearby and he saw the plane - he said it was flying erratically, then made somewhat of a right turn, then crashed. Two things. He never mentioned it being inverted, but the voice over said that's how it happened. I'm not a pilot, in aviation or know anything abut how these things happen, but I find the 'crash scene' awfully clean. I mean wasn't this supposed to be a 757, traveling at 500+ MPH? Would that make such a small impact? Maybe it would! What do I know! If it's traveling that fast, maybe it obliterated everything? Maybe not. Seemingly there would be SOME debris, bodies, anything? And from what I can gather as of late (My bad - never really looked in 93) there was virtually nothing around, rescue workers said it, medical people etc.
Maybe someone with great knowledge could explain?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
