Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conspiracism as a Flawed Worldview: An Essay

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
inthebrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 07:56 AM
Original message
Conspiracism as a Flawed Worldview: An Essay
I was going to release a diatribe regarding the pointless nature of these conspiracy theories. unfortunalty some already beat me to the punch and does a better job of hitting the nail squarely on the head than I.


“Conspiracy theory as a theory of power, then, is an ideological misrecognition of power relations, articulated to but neither defining nor defined by populism, interpellating believers as “the people” opposed to a relatively secret, elite “power bloc.” Yet such a definition does not exhaust conspiracy theory’s significance in contemporary politics and culture; as with populism, the interpellation of “the people” opposed to the “power bloc” plays a crucial role in any movement for social change. Moreover, as I have argued, just because overarching conspiracy theories are wrong does not mean they are not on to something. Specifically, they ideologically address real structural inequities, and constitute a response to a withering civil society and the concentration of the ownership of the means of production, which together leave the political subject without the ability to be recognized or to signify in the public realm.”

Fenster, Mark (1999).
Conspiracy Theories: Secrecy and Power in American Culture Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press



Conspiracism as a Flawed Worldview: An Essay
by Chip Berlet
Every major traumatic event in U.S. history generates a new round of speculation about conspiracies. The attacks on 9/11/01 are no exception. The tendency to explain all major world events as primarily the product of a conspiracy is called conspiracism.

Conspiracism can be used to critique the current regime or an excuse to defend the current regime against critics. David Brion Davis noted that "crusades against subversion have never been the monopoly of a single social class or ideology, but have been readily appropriated by highly diverse groups." When the government and its allies use conspiracism to justify political repression of dissidents, it is called "countersubversion." Frank Donner perceived an institutionalized culture of countersubversion in the United States "marked by a distinct pathology: conspiracy theory, moralism, nativism, and suppressiveness." The article Repression & Ideology explains how conspiracism works when it is part of a campaign against dissidents.

Conspiracism as part of an anti-regime populist movement works in a different fashion. Populist conspiracism sees secret plots by tiny cabals of evildoers as the major motor powering important historical events. Conspiracism tries to figure out how power is exercised in society, but ends up oversimplifying the complexites of modern society by blaming societal problems on manipulation by a handful of evil individuals. This is not an analysis that accurately evaluates the systems, structures and institutions of modern society. As such, conspiracism is neither investigative reporting, which seeks to expose actual conspiracies through careful research; nor is it power structure research, which seeks to accurately analyze the distribution of power and privilege in a society. Sadly, some sincere people who seek social and economic justice are attracted to conspiracism. Overwhelmingly, however, conspiracism in the U.S. is the central historic narrative of right-wing populism.

The conspiracist blames societal or individual problems on what turns out to be a demonized scapegoat. Conspiracism is a narrative form of scapegoating that portrays an enemy as part of a vast insidious plot against the common good. Conspiracism assigns tiny cabals of evildoers a superhuman power to control events, frames social conflict as part of a transcendent struggle between Good and Evil, and makes leaps of logic, such as guilt by association, in analyzing evidence. Conspiracists often employ common fallacies of logic in analyzing factual evidence to assert connections, causality, and intent that are frequently unlikely or nonexistent. As a distinct narrative form of scapegoating, conspiracism uses demonization to justify constructing the scapegoats as wholly evil while reconstructing the scapegoater as a hero.
The current wave of conspiracism has two main historic sources, irrational fears of a freemason conspiracy and irrational fears of a Jewish conspiracy. There are many purveyors of the conspiracist worldview and the belief structure is surprisingly widespread. Conspiracist ideas are promoted by several right-wing institutions, the John Birch Society, the Liberty Lobby, and the Lyndon LaRouche networks. These groups are examples of right-wing populism in which conspiracist narratives such as producerism are common. In Western culture, conspiracist scapegoating is rooted in apocalyptic fears and millennial expectations. Sometimes conspiracism is secularized and adopted by portions of the political left. It is interesting to note that on both the left and the right (as well as the center) there are critics of the apocalyptic style and flawed methodology of conspiracism.

In highlighting conspiracist allegation as a form of scapegoating, it is important to remember the following:

All conspiracist theories start with a grain of truth, which is then transmogrified with hyperbole and filtered through pre-existing myth and prejudice,

People who believe conspiracist allegations sometimes act on those irrational beliefs, which has concrete consequences in the real world,

Conspiracist thinking and scapegoating are symptoms, not causes, of underlying societal frictions, and as such are perilous to ignore,

Scapegoating and conspiracist allegations are tools that can be used by cynical leaders to mobilize a mass following,

Supremacist and fascist organizers use conspiracist theories as a relatively less-threatening entry point in making contact with potential recruits,

Even when conspiracist theories do not center on Jews, people of color, or other scapegoated groups, they create an environment where racism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of prejudice and oppression can flourish.

http://www.publiceye.org/tooclose/scapegoating.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
petgoat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Right, there's no such thing as a conspiracy.
Defense lawyers know this. When their clients are charged under
federal conspiracy statutes, all they need to say is: "Ladies
and Gentlemen of the jury, the prosecutor is a tin-foil doodoohead!
The liquor store robbery in connection with which my client is
charged can not have been the result of a conspiracy--it would have
had to include thousands, it would have been so complicated it could
not have come off, and somebody would have talked!"

Instant exoneration. Works every time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-04-06 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. the current regime IS a conspiracy
what the author means is conspiracies that differ from the official conspiracy put forward by the ruling elite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nozebro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tell it to Hillary. She obviously needs your insight. Bill, too.

"It's all part of the vast right-wing conspiracy". HRC

"Isn't it obvious?". WJC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Goodness! I'm glad I don't believe in any conspiracy theories
However, I am fully behind an independent investigation of the events leading up to and occurring on 9/11.

Now there may be a conspiracy out there to stop us from knowing the full truth, but that's another matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. 19 Terrorists randomly decided to hijack 4 airplanes at the exact same...
moment and ironically all decided to attack the same targets that another random person named Osama thought would be good targets.


...Or are you saying that conspiracies can exist only when you believe them? If that is the measure then is it acceptable to say that 19 people "conspired" to attack the U.S. on 9/11? As long as you believe the theory, to question that conspiracy becomes unacceptable because conpiracies that a majority of the people believe (64%) must be true and those in the minority that believe the opposite (36%) must be false. By that measure, since 54% of Americans believe Saddam Hussein was responsible for 9/11 then that must be true even though our own President has said that is not true. Furthermore, when 80% of the people of the U.S. believed Iraq possessed WMD and were "conspiring" to hide that evidence from the world, that too must be true but then how do you reckon that with our current reality? Obviously, most people now believe that conspiracy was false and also believe that members of our Government "conspired" to offer us that illusion... maybe, just maybe, a conspiracy must rely on the facts of the case and not the views of the person who defends it. Of course, you shouldn't listen to me, me and people like me are merely conspiring to "create an environment where racism, anti-Semitism, and other forms of prejudice and oppression can flourish."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think....
you really should have taken your shot at the diatribe. I don't post much here, but I have to say, the offerings of the otc in the form of free pschycological analysis are appreciated by me. It confirms my belief that they have nothing left to offer as to a valid argument against the truthseekers. As usual, and in few words, petgoat, from forty virtual paces, has split the hammer that was squarely on the head of the nail you're trying to hammer home. Are there really people out there who believe that by reading a few paragraphs of psycho-babble, by someone noone has heard of(I haven't anyway) will cancel out the beliefs of those who have spent many hours researching this particular event? Only if they were mentally weak enough to influence, they live in the dark ages, or are drugged and brainwashed, and that in itself, eliminates anyone here who does not succumb to the simplistic, and rediculous blatherings of the official government story. Just conduct an independent, and full investigation. If there is no evidence to justify action against the Bush admin, then it's over with. Why are the otc people so scared shitless by this? Looking at both sides of the issue, one can only conclude a vested interest in the muffling of the 9/11 truth movement. Just my o2. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-08-06 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why are you so afraid
of trying to find out the truth?

Why do you work so hard to try to prevent other people from trying to find out the truth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mogster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. If I'd told you in 1999 that your country will soon legalize torture, you'd answer?
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 06:24 AM by mogster
fill in, please
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC