|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:28 PM Original message |
Demolition of the Twin Towers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
1. Lack of a plausible, detailed scenario on .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:39 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. so you agree it was demolition but just don't know how it was done? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:17 AM Response to Reply #3 |
17. No ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:21 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. This is the same argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:48 AM Response to Reply #18 |
23. But if a particular CT is not plausible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
24. Here's one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 05:54 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. This actually proves my point ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 06:05 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. He does address this in his "reply to NIST" section |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 06:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. It's simple .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 06:27 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. He also addresses the energy deficit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 08:46 AM Response to Reply #24 |
38. I always do a test with these CT analysis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 05:09 AM Response to Reply #38 |
55. He explains it above that, in greater detail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Contrite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 06:45 AM Response to Reply #38 |
58. You can argue it with him yourself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
34. Arguing for nuclear weapons? Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vincent_vega_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 12:21 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. I would love to see your calculations as to how much |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant_wait_for_2008 (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 05:57 AM Response to Reply #3 |
56. Nuclear weapons used on the WTC ??? Give me a break !!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Listening to people who know what they're talking about -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. Not sure who you are referring to-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
43. "blown to kingdom come" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 08:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. what exact points are you refuting of my post anyway? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 03:49 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. I honestly do not even suspect demolition. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 08:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. so still you keep coming back here for more? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #12 |
19. DU is worth it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 06:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. "DU is worth it"??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 06:57 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Really?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 08:37 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. that ain't DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 09:12 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. It is me, though, "posting outside the 9/11 forum" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:08 AM Response to Reply #30 |
48. Uh...that's not DU, and Hekmatyar is hugely CIA involved |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:17 AM Response to Reply #48 |
50. Okede-dokedy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 08:38 PM Response to Reply #19 |
33. Not really-- but it seems the other way around is very likely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quickesst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 09:15 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:39 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. thank you quickesst! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
William Seger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 08:04 PM Response to Reply #14 |
31. "Why do these threads continue if the issue has been proven as fact? " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:44 AM Response to Reply #14 |
45. obviously |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:43 AM Response to Reply #11 |
44. disputed and refuted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
16. I just figured out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bolo Boffin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:40 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Dec-30-06 09:08 PM Response to Original message |
6. Farkin.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 01:52 AM Response to Original message |
7. Oh, another list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. "Trust Bush's experts" is not exactly a persuasive rebuttal. (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:35 AM Response to Reply #10 |
41. Nothing of substance to rebut |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 08:58 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. okay... pbp |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 10:25 AM Response to Reply #13 |
39. Those are very good points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:36 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. No good points by spooked at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 02:43 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. But you haven't disagreed with any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:14 AM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Wrong again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 03:43 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. You haven't rebutted spook's rebuttal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G Hawes (440 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 02:15 AM Response to Reply #51 |
52. Read much? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-04-07 02:47 AM Response to Reply #52 |
61. Why ask more from you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wildbilln864 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 11:12 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. self delete... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:28 AM Response to Original message |
8. Quote from NBC's Brian Williams |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 02:35 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Filmed right after demolition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Dec-31-06 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
35. Here are the principal data that must be explained: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jan-01-07 06:41 AM Response to Reply #35 |
37. I doubt if the planners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jan-02-07 01:55 AM Response to Reply #37 |
46. Jim Hoffman has a short comment about directed energy beams, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 02:47 AM Response to Reply #37 |
53. I've thought that too, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-04-07 07:40 AM Response to Reply #53 |
62. Gas is an explosive too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mirandapriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 03:07 AM Response to Reply #37 |
54. That's an interesting theory about the existing fuel lines, though... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 06:06 AM Response to Reply #54 |
57. Isn't how that fellow on E 62nd Street |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dailykoff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 02:17 PM Response to Reply #35 |
59. I lean toward the big wedding theory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabbat hunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-03-07 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
60. asbestos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC