False Flag Prospects, 2008: Top 3 US Target Cities by Captain Eric H. May

[Joanne98]

The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out. As I’ll detail below, this is exactly how government perpetrators in the US and UK handled the 9/11 and 7/7 “terror” attacks, which were in reality government attacks blamed on “terrorists.”

Although ill health keeps me from working as hard in the area of false flag analysis as I used to, the urging of independent editors and brother intelligence officers has prompted me to write this essay. I’ll keep it short for readers with limited time, but I will include invaluable links for those who want to delve deeper and understand better.

My aim, as a former military intelligence officer who spent five years with the U.S. Army 75th Division conducting military war games, is to convince the American people that the “next 9/11″ — constantly promised by officials and the media — is likely to be carried out under the guise of future military exercises. If the American people are aware of pending exercises and the danger they represent, then the exercises cannot “go live” and effect the very terror events that they are supposed to be rehearsing against.

Military Exercises

The 9/11, 2001 attacks in the United States and the 7/7, 2005 attacks in the United Kingdom both have smoking guns proving that the mass murderers were not foreign terrorists but domestic tyrants. Each country’s government was conducting military exercises that simulated the exact events that were to occur.

The US 9/11 Commission stumbled across strong evidence of treason by Dick Cheney when it interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta, who was present in Cheney’s famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped toward Washington, DC. Cheney was at the center of national military exercises simulating terrorist hijackings of US aircraft — at the very time that those hijackings were occurring in real life. On May 23, 2003, Secretary Mineta testified:

“During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”

9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton failed to follow up on the bombshell revelation, and quickly switched the topic. Thanks to YouTube, Mineta’s astounding revelation and Hamilton’s amazing reaction are both viewable on a three minute clip:
http://dandelionsalad.wordpress.com/2008/02/24/false-flag-prospects-2008-top-3-us-target-cities-by-captain-eric-h-may/

[LARED]

1. These guy are truly funny

Top Three US Target Cities

Last year I published “Next 9/11, Summer 2007?” in response to the same kind of requests that have led me to publish this essay as a 2008 update. My 2007 three most likely cities for the next 9/11 were Houston, Chicago and Portland. This year the same three cities are still most endangered, in light of the fact that the US military has designated Texas, Indiana and Oregon as three of its four target states in the 2008 version of its Noble Resolve military exercises. Granted, Chicago is in Illinois, not Indiana, but Indiana is quite close, and has been used to stage forces for terror exercises conducted in Chicago in recent years.

It may come as a surprise to people not acquainted with military preparations that the same cities remain on the list even though analysts like me have publicized them widely. There are considerable difficulties in setting up the political, police, military and media players necessary to support a false flag attack. While many in the 911 truth movement believes that national military forces can simply hit any city at any time, it’s not so easy — thank God. Fortunately, this means that those of us who study false flag prospects and focus on most likely targets; regrettably, this means that target cities can’t breathe easy just because they have detected, exposed and preempted a single false flag attempt.

What's no surprise is the "Next 9/11, Summer 2007" was dead wrong. :rofl: (but that won't stop the idiocy)

Even for an analyst of his caliber :sarcasm:

[salvorhardin]

2. "Indiana is quite close"

I guess that explains Gary, Indiana then. It's a NWO base. I always wondered about that.

[CJCRANE]

3. There are internal battles

within the bureaucracy that can stifle Cheney's plans. The publication of the Iran NIE is one example, maybe there are other examples that we don't know about yet.

[LARED]

4. The only internal battles relating to the OP

is the battles between the voices in Captain Eric H. May's head.

[Laurier]

6. Isn't this the same guy who has been using numerology to predict

"the next 9/11" since 2004?


What a nutcase.

[Sweet Pea]

5. Excellent!

Let's send the teams to the largest cities in Houston, Chicago and Portland and find the pre-planted explosives that are obviously already in the tallest and most important buildings!

It will be a snap! We'll identify the buildings that have had a powerdown at any time in the last 6 months, and we'll look for changes in security patterns and voila! Instant Credibility!

Then we can end this silly charade NOW! Today! No more guessing! No more having those *nauseatingly* pendantic OCT'ers make fun of us and our No Plane theories!

We'll find those explosives! And the little dog, too!

[Sweet Pea]

7. Didn't think....

anyone would jump on this suggestion. I guess the probability of not finding any embedded explosives in any of the tallest or most important buildings in Houston or Chicago or Portland might not go over too well with the Troofer faithful.

[Ghost in the Machine]

9. "Didn't think...." is only one part of your problem....

"I guess the probability of not finding any embedded explosives in any of the tallest or most important buildings in Houston or Chicago or Portland might not go over too well with the Troofer faithful."

Your "guess" is also wrong, and would be another part of your problem. The reality of the situation is that people have just quit responding to your childish antics and boorish behavior. That's not a "guess", that's a fact.... Maybe you should start thinking and stop guessing?? :shrug:

Please PM me if you ever post anything that's remotely intelligent or informative, I don't want to miss it...

Thanks

[greyl]

10. Why are you trying to discourage an investigation? nt

[Sweet Pea]

17. Guess That Means....

you won't be looking for those explosives, huh?

Damn....I was hoping *someone* would go find them.

Since they are obviously there, and all.

I'm just sayin.....

[JackRiddler]

8. "Who is Capt. Eric May?"

A thread well worth the reading here:
http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2545

[HamdenRice]

12. So what's your take on this?

Disinformation I suppose is chess, not checkers. If I were an agency that wanted to discredit the Truth Movement, I suppose I would infiltrate some trained military public affairs/disinfo agent. But why would I have that agent announce to the world he is an intel/military public affairs/disinfo agent and an anti-Semite to boot. Unless he is an actual right wing, anti-Semite, intel/military guy who sincerely believes an inside job scenario. Unless he is a disinfo agent who wants others to believe he is an actual sincere right wing, anti-Semite, intel/military guy who believes the inside job scenario, but isn't, and is instead intended to attract wackos and discredit the movement.

At some point it just gets too complex, but I wonder what your take on it actually is -- or is it just to stay away from it.

[LARED]

13. How about just plain old irrationality

forget chess or checkers. How about a nice game of follow the kook. Is this as simple as having a kook with a blog and people read into and assign whatever level of credibility confirms their viewpoint.

[HamdenRice]

14. I was asking Jack

While I appreciate your opinion, the reason I was asking Jack is I believe IIRC that he has some first hand experience with these types politically infighting in organizations.

As for your theory, the problem is that the person in question claims to have experience in military intelligence. That means he is either lying or military intelligence hires and trains "irrational" "kooks".

That hasn't been my experience with military intelligence types.

[LARED]

16. It's easy to claim anything you like on the Internet

My step father is retired military intelligence. I also have a close friend that is x military intelligence. Real military intelligence guys do not go around commanding ghost armies of one via the Internet spouting BS. (in theory the real intelligence guys tell me that "they" would make him quiet if he was revealing confidential information)

So either the guys an unbalanced kook that HAD or was associated with military intelligence or he is just a plain old run of the mill Internet kook. Why anyone pays any attention to these people is beyond me.

[JackRiddler]

15. He demands authority...

engages in pointless fear mongering, twists logic, rants about the Jews, and claims to have a secret group of whom he is the only visible member. What more do I need to know? I'm not in his head, won't speculate about his sincerity. He may believe everything he writes.

[MinM]

11. Why Portland?

Here's another article that forewarned of a possible false-flag attack on Portland. Which begs a couple questions ..

Was this a case of Crying Wolf? Or .. Did the attention that was drawn to this avert disaster (i.e., the Minot - Barksdale Air Force Base - Broken Arrow/Bent Spear episode)?

TOPOFF 4 and Vigilant Shield 08: a view from the "feverish fringe"

Why Portland?

Well, why not? Somebody's got to be the target. Putting random chance aside, there are several good reasons why Portland was chosen to host this year's main anti-terrorist event. We're told Portland's mayor and Oregon's governor actually requested that Portland be included in the exercises. I'm assuming those requests were made with one arm pinned behind their backs by an ex-pro wrestler turned spook who keeps raising the wrist just a tiny bit more.

In any case, the feds graciously honored the request and here they come, the honchos of the national security apparatus.

So why is Portland on the short list for a simulated nuclear terrorist attack on a major American city that may just "go live?" First, it's reachable by water, which preserves the old "suitcase nuke delivered by boat to a harbor near you" scenario we've all heard for years. Second, it's among the bluest of American coastal cities and, while San Francisco must present a tempting target, it's home to several major banks, insurance companies and other GOP infrastructure favorites. Third, LA and Seattle, a couple more anti-GOP cities with bull's-eyes on their civic centers, are too strategic to what's left of the economy. And fourth, Portland's kind of . . . disposable..
False Flags over Portland?

Vlogging The Apocalypse :: Video :: TOPOFF3 2005 Terror Drill - Virtual News Network

The TOPOFF 3 scenario will depict a complex terrorist campaign and drive the exercise play through the homeland security system, beginning in Connecticut and New Jersey, and leading to national and international response.

Over the course of several days fire personnel will conduct search and rescue, hospitals will treat the injured (played by role players), subject-matter experts will analyze the effects of the attack on public health, and top officials will deploy resources and make the difficult decisions needed to save lives.

An internal Virtual News Network (VNN) and news website will provide real-time reporting of the story like an actual TV network would. The mock media will keep players up-to-date on unfolding events and enable decision makers to face the challenge of dealing with the real world media. Only participating agencies can view the VNN broadcast.
http://www.iwar.org.uk/news-archive/2005/03-17-07.htm

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/generalities/forrest_sawyer_injured_in_chopper_crash_72756.asp#email

DU | Regarding yesterday's LOOSE NUKES story!!! Important update!
Was a Covert Attempt to Bomb Iran with Nuclear Weapons foiled by a Military Leak?