babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 12:58 PM
Original message |
I'd like some feedback on this. Could it be possible? |
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I've seen this before. I believe it's been debunked. |
DenverDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Can we please worry about this on 11/3??? |
|
We don't need a red herring in the punchbowl right now.
After President Kerry is inagurated, we will investigate the hell out of What Really Happened on 9/11.
Until then, just GOTV.
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
10. This is the 9/11 Forum, DenverDem. That's the topic here, not GOTV. |
|
Want to discuss the election? I hear there's a really nice Campaign 2004 Forum here, too.
|
JHB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. Thanks for that thread. |
|
I just received this from a friend and admit to no prior knowledge that there was even a question as to whether a plane hit the Pentagon or not. My inquiring mind wanted to know and I don't want to start a cat fight about it.
|
BeFree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
11. So, what do you think, sis? |
|
Are you convinced, beyond a reasonable doubt, that what exploded outside the pentagon was not a Boeing?
Aye, there's a bit of controversy about what transpired. Seems there are no pics detailing a Boeing and there are several theories which explain the differing scenarios, including the one the 9/11 Ommissioners whitewashed.
'Twould be interseting to hear what you think, seeing as you came to this forum with just the one theory under your belt.
Are there some crazy people here, or what?
|
demnan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I know eye witnesses who saw the plane.
|
DulceDecorum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Some pilots and hijackers are still alive |
|
Edited on Wed Oct-06-04 01:56 PM by DulceDecorum
|
MercutioATC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Re: the planes still being registered..... |
WoodrowFan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
check the other threads, hundreds of eyewitnesses, physical evidence, id 'd bodies, etc, etc. The naysayers are in the "world is really flat" class.
|
stickdog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Oct-06-04 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Yes, it COULD be true. |
|
However, this little production clearly and completely overstates its case, IMHO. And it contains a few (at least seemingly) factual flaws.
|
impe
(185 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-07-04 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Washington Post Metro Section Today |
|
"One Man's Unorthodox Ideas about the 9/11 Attack on the Pentagon Go Global in a Flash."
Even though the article dismisses "In Plane Site" as conspiracy theory nuttery...it did nothing to address the specific discrepancies featured in the film. Looks like it's getting hot for someone and this is normal operating procedures. Give it attention and dismiss it at the same time as untrue.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |