Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hopsicker Cointelpro 9/11 part 2

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 08:54 PM
Original message
Hopsicker Cointelpro 9/11 part 2
~~~~~~~~

How amazing is that? Saudi “Professor” Abdullah Shaikh is so well protected by the Bush Administration that they wouldn't even let the FBI serve a subpoena to compel his testimony before the Intelligence Committee investigation into the 9/11 attack, even though it was the only subpoena issued by the congressional inquiry.

Maybe Senator Graham should have tried calling the "Make A Wish" Foundation.

“That was a smoking gun,'' Graham said, although inexplicably no one in the media was paying him any attention. “The reason for this cover-up goes right to the White House.''

~~~~~~~~

Apparently there has been some talk that David Gray had worked for the CIA.

“John has a personal life history which I think helps explain why he would become a 9/11 skeptic,” wrote Zwicker. “He has reason to be deeply suspicious of the power elite. His father, a Texas oil millionaire, tried to warn the authorities in Dallas, prior to Nov. 22, 1963, that JFK's life was in danger. He had heard the rumors circulating.”

If you follow Hopsicker, you'll want to read this
http://www.madcowprod.com/mc6712004.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks RebelYell
read it, loved it. “Saudi Genesis.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think Hopsicker will unravel 9/11
And you're very welcome!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now this is more like it!
I think Hopsicker got silly last time attacking Ruppert and Fitts for no good reason. (Maybe they took money from a glorified pyramid scheme for a few speaking engagements, but they didn't deserve Hopsicker's insinuations.) John Gray's another matter. He should be exposed, and 9/11 skeptics are well advised to avoid associating with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I think he was disappointed
I was disappointed in Ruppert, too. We need people like them to stay credible, or we'll never get to the bottom of it. I think there's healthy competition between them and Hopsicker respects Ruppert and doesn't want him to lose focus. JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreativeNative Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hopsicker has ZERO credibility
with many readers who are familiar with him.

Hopsicker plays fast and loose with the facts,
distorting good people's motives and making
them look sinister. Hopsicker's tirades are chock
full of suspect distortions and half truths.

Hopsicker's journalism integrity is similar to Rush Limbaugh's,
who is also unworthy of shining Mike Ruppert's shoes.

In person, Hopsicker has a condescending manner
which exudes arrogence and close mindedness
towards any ideas outside his narrow world views.

A big NO thank you to Hopsicker's crappola.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. First post?
Enjoy your stay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grandg Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. any examples?

You mean that was not really Mohammed Atta's girlfriend?

please, provide examples of Hopsicker's distortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreativeNative Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. this Hopsicker article is CHOCK full of
Edited on Fri Oct-08-04 10:41 AM by CreativeNative
fake character distortions (not to mention sloppy name mispellings)
from beginning to end.
http://www.madcowprod.com/mc532004.html

I was at the San Fransico 9/11 Inquiry and will assure you
that his representation of that event is completely twisted.
For a different take, look here:
http://www.deceptiondollar.com/Inquiry911.htm

Hopsicker consistantly mixes a little good stuff in
with outright fabrications to come up with fake drama.
Because of this consistant journalistic habit, and not because
he is an arrogent ass, is why Hopsicker holds little credibility.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grandg Donating Member (98 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. also
you may want to look at this story on the Moroccan Embassy.

He has undoubtly tied the Moroccan's Military Attache in DC to the people who trained the terrorists. Colonel Ahmed Arara is the Military Attache, his relative Mohammed Arara is on several FBI watchlists and lived at 3 seperate addresses owned by the Hamouda's who are flight school operators. (who also trained terrorists). Sandra Hamouda is married to Pascal Shreier who was the chief recruiter for both Arne Kruithof and Rudi Dekkers. The Colonel just met with Rumsfeld earlier this year so u know he aint in trouble.

The Arara's also started a business in FL called Titim holdings. titim means to 'fall down' in Irish. The business address was in Coral Springs, less than 1000 feet from where Atta and al-Shehhi stayed for months.

The military attache is one of the most powerful positions in the embassy. The Arara's are so intertwined with the 911 participants that this story should be front page news.

So tell me, creativenative, who else is out there actually researching what happened. Not Ruppert, thats for sure, he is to busy talking about theories. theories didnt do 911, people did it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-08-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. You're right on target
There were 4,000 FBI agents working on 9/11 until the anthrax attacks, which conveniently took them from off 9/11. No one but Hopsicker has investigated 9/11 and the Florida ties. I couldn't care less if he's arrogant. If he's got facts, I'm listening.

His first book about Barry Seal is proving to be invaluable in our investigations of the crooks currently occupying the WH.

Frankly, anyone who believes that 9/11 wasn't an inside job is fooling themselves.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC