explosions...

[wildbilln864]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJO_7Ca6VFE&feature=related

[wildbilln864]

1. kick! nt

[SDuderstadt]

2. It's pretty pathetic when....

no one responds and you have to kick your own OP.

[Ghost in the Machine]

3. It's even more pathetic when....

you feel a need to respond (again) with nothing intelligent or of any relevance...

[wildbilln864]

4. Hey Ghost...

how's it going?
I hope more will do the research themselves and judge on their own.
Check this one out...video :hi:

[wildbilln864]

5. kick! nt

[victordrazen]

6. Well, it's hard to respond because we KNOW there were

many people saying there were explosions, that is a given, and they don't appear to be media and government employees either, from what I gather, like some of the "other" witnesseses.

But, like everything else with 911, nothing is said or done about it, except by a few of us.

[SDuderstadt]

7. Yeah, you guys are the real vanguard....

yet, somehow, your movement does not seem to be growing.

[BeFree]

10. Sad: Stupid And Dumb?

You seem to delight in the idea that bushco is suppressing the facts. Not many people are willing to come right out and do so, but here you are. Really, SAD as can be.

[SDuderstadt]

12. Excuse me, but how, specifically, is Bushco "suppressing the facts"?

Are you saying that there are no independent investigations of 9/11? If the "9/11 truth movement" is thwarted by the facts being suppressed, then how in the world are they making the claims they are making? Are you admitting they are without evidence?

[defendandprotect]

8. Good find and it is only part of the endless testimony to the explosions . . .

and film seems to suggest they were being triggered by helicopter/s flying about WTC and

coming in and out and setting them off ---

Also, the LOBBY destruction is testimony to the reality that they FIRST set off

explosions in the basements ---

that's how the lobby was destroyed.

[SDuderstadt]

13. D & P "logic"...

Helicopters were observed around the WTC during the collapse, therefore the helicopters "triggered" the collapses. Jesus.

[SidDithers]

9. ...

Sid

[whatchamacallit]

11. Yeah, it could have been a giant's footstep!

:eyes:

[PatrickSMcNally]

14. What type?

Commissioner Stephen Gregory of the Bureau of Communications had commented in an interview that:

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/20050812_WTC_GRAPHIC/Gregory_Stephen.txt

-----
I saw low-level flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was. I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down.

Q. Was that on the lower level of the building or up where the fire was?

A. No, the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw. And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did yc.u see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too.

I don't know if that means anything. I mean, I equate it to the building coming down and pushing things down, it could have been electrical explosions, it could have been whatever.
-----

So he's saying that it looked like explosions which one might see when a building is demolished, but could have been electrical explosions. Does anyone have anything more definite than that?