Get your tinfoil on. Pentagon impact questions from 9/11

[Gregorian]

Ok, it's late, and I just got this in my email. Maybe it's already old. I had never seen it before. Even as an engineer, I just dismissed the theory that something other than the aledged 575, rammed into the Pentagon. And I"m not much of a tinfoiler. But having just watched this flash movie, I have to say I'm again wondering what happened. I think if you watch the whole thing, you'll see the part that really really has me wondering- several layers of Pentagon wall that were reinforced concrete, that had neatly severed holes. Well, you check it out....

http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php

[henslee]

1. Get ready to be pounced. I think this has been quite debunked.

Though when I saw it I was ready to join X files junior scouts of america.

[rooboy]

2. The neatly severed holes are easily explained...

as the plane was crashing the terrorists cut through the layers in the Pentagon with their boxcutters. I believe that's somewhere in the back of the 9/11 report. :)

[DrWeird]

3. You're an engineer?

You're joking. Are you one of those "alternative engineers?"

[LARED]

10. Must be one of those

google engineers.

[Zhade]

4. Interesting.

Nicely done, too.

[Rosco T.]

5. Get this DVD...

http://www.policestate21.com/

watch it, then make up your own mind.

I did. No Boeing.

[TeeYiYi]

6. Thanks . . .

. . . for the link. Someone did a good job putting that together and compressing it to stream so fast. It says it all.

TYY

[RH]

7. Maybe it's already old?

Older than that.

:eyes:

:boring:

[MercutioATC]

8. OK, one more time for the three people on the planet who've missed it:

http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html

Look here. It provides answers to most of the "questions" posed by the video.

It has the added benefit of being written by professional civil engineers who directly examined the site rather than a propogandist who saw a few pictures on the internet.

[tngledwebb]

9. Please, skeptics and newbies who've just fallen down the stairs,

go right away to the cited report and when you find conclusive proof let us know. Re (a few???) photos on the internet, see the DOD site for 9/11 and ask what's missing-then Google 'Killtown'
Btw, the ASCE study is ON THE INTERNET TOO! :tinfoilhat:

[MercutioATC]

11. The report speaks for itself. It's the only report based on direct

observation and the only report written by professional civil engineers.

Disagree with the conclusions? Bring me a report written by somebody who actually examined the site who has professional qualifications. I'll reexamine my views.

[tngledwebb]

12. Please to point out, show us where

any part of the report proves that a Boeing hit the Pentagon.

[MercutioATC]

13. I never claimed that the ASCE report proved that.

It does, however, refute those who claim that it's impossible that a 757 caused the damage sustained by the Pentagon.

[BeFree]

14. Impossible?

No one says it was impossible that a 757 caused the damage.

All your cherished report claims is a "Rationalization" of the damage seen at the pentagon if indeed a 757 had hit it.

It does not refute anything. In fact, if you read it you have to wonder about the scientific validity of their "Rationalization".

It is possible that a 757 hit the pentagon, but there is not enough evidence to turn that possibility into a conclusion.

[tngledwebb]

15. missed the point, Mercute.

A 757, 100 drunken college students, a swarm of locusts, a low yield nuke, even a sudden glimpse of the Neo-Con's loving faces MIGHT have caused the damage. We want to know where is the PROOF, in any official report, that a Boeing HIT the Pentagon, (whether or not it entered thru an 18ft wide ground floor window. engines and wings combed back nicely, pierced three rings and six walls and finally melted into the ether, like you and some other professionals would have us believe.) That's what the ASCE report don't know nothing about.

[tngledwebb]

16. The answers to this and other 9/11 mysteries

are to be found here and in the DU archives.

[Lithos]

17. Locking

Duplicate. Please continue here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=22200