Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 06:28 AM
Original message |
Part of 9/11 Report Remains Unreleased; An Inquiry Is Begun |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/30/politics/30panel.html?pagewanted=allTne last chapter of the investigation by the Sept. 11 commission, a supplement completed more than two months ago, has not yet been made public by the Justice Department, and officials say it is unlikely to be released before the presidential election, even though that had been a major goal of deadlines set for the panel.
Drawing from this unpublished part of the inquiry, the commission quietly asked the inspectors general at the Departments of Defense and Transportation to review what it had determined were broadly inaccurate accounts provided by several civil and military officials about efforts to track and chase the hijacked aircraft on Sept. 11...
...Besides the pursuit of the hijacked planes, the supplement, a monograph 60 to 70 pages long, revisits other subjects in the commission's final report of July - telephone calls made from the hijacked airplanes, airline security and orders issued that morning by President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney - and provides additional detail or context, former commission members said.
The monograph also finds shortcomings in the Transportation Security Administration, the agency formed to buttress airline security after the hijackings, said Bob Kerrey, the former Democratic senator from Nebraska and a commission member.http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1030-07.htm"Drawing from this unpublished part of the inquiry, the commission quietly asked the inspectors general at the Departments of Defense and Transportation to review what it had determined were broadly inaccurate accounts provided by several civil and military officials about efforts to track and chase the hijacked aircraft on September 11," the newspaper said.
"In testimony before the commission, officials had described a quick response to the hijackings that narrowly missed intercepting some of the planes, but the commission's investigators later determined from documentary evidence that none of the military planes were anywhere near the four airliners," the report added.
"Officials at the Federal Aviation Administration testified that they had notified the military within a few minutes of each hijacking, but the investigation found that tape recordings contradicted that assertion," it noted.WTF is going on??
|
Cooley Hurd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-02-04 06:33 AM
Response to Original message |
1. What happened to Flt 93? |
|
...and why did they (the ChimpCo) feel the need to lie about it?
Don't get me wrong... I know why they lied, and you know why they lied. But I want to see in IN PRINT!
It still pisses me off that they continue to manipulate the facts of 9/11 for their own political gain.
Fascists - every last one of them!!!:grr::grr::grr::grr::grr:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:28 AM
Response to Original message |