BooBluePotion
(201 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-30-09 04:11 PM
Original message |
How busy is Logan and Dulles? |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 04:19 PM by BooBluePotion
Can I ask a witness to come forward and provide proof that the passengers arrived and flew out of these ports? An employee. Or security camera perhaps?
|
vincent_vega_lives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 10:12 AM
Response to Original message |
1. sure go ahead and ask (n/t) |
BooBluePotion
(201 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Is there a such thing as skycams? or passengercams |
|
I need visual access to the four flights that departed on 9/11 but I would need a passenger cam installed on all four flights to track down the passenger destinations. Make sure this doesn't happen again!
For sure
|
Realityhack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. WTF are you talking about? n/t |
BooBluePotion
(201 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. The board of education installs buscams on their vehicles |
|
Why not install passengercams with ground control access on all flights? It would cut down on false crash reports and I could see the passengers in real time.
|
greyl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yeah, more surveillance from Big Brother is what progressives yearn for. nt |
BooBluePotion
(201 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. This will prevent fake hijackings |
|
And vanishing terrorist victims. There is no advantage for repubs or palin like domestic terror groups that author sinister documents in the hopes of starting illegal wars.
|
greyl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. It definitely will not stop people from believing in fake hijackings, however. |
|
"The tape is fake!", "The video was doctored!"
|
BooBluePotion
(201 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. A minor problem in the beginning stages of the program |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 02:18 PM by BooBluePotion
Only those with next of kin can fly or a designated relative with webcam to skycam access The more witnesses the better but your point still stands in some cases,skycams won't convince everyone.
|
greyl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Oh, I get it. You're joking. |
BooBluePotion
(201 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. My Sentiments toward the official story |
|
Neo cons won't get off the hook so easy next time. A boy/girl friend will not be accepted as next of kin when this bill passes through congress.
|
Realityhack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Well at least I know what you are talking about now. |
|
Not that you are making any more sense.
|
BooBluePotion
(201 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-31-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Who would be against skycams? |
|
:) A new Progressive Invention to stop false crash reports.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:12 PM
Response to Original message |