Pentagon bldg. damage: (this isn't the ASCE report)

[Abe Linkman]

In the real world, the claims about damage to the Pentagon allegedly by the crash of FL 77 are difficult to reconcile with this photo.
Obivously, disinfo agents and PR flacks have a hard time with the substantive issues of what happened at the Pentagon, so don't be deterred by efforts to distract you or change the subject or "shoot the messenger tactics (M.O. of "lared" and "vvl").

Take a look at this, and THINK for yourself.

http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr68c.html

[vpigrad]

1. Very Nice!

There's never been any evidence that a plane hit the Pentagon.

[idiosyncratic]

2. Those pictures are amazing. I've bookmarked that site. n/t

[MercutioATC]

3. Ah! Yet another lay opinion based on photos....

...this one accompanied by such insightful commentary as:

"Next up is the photo to the right, which depicts ... uhhh, I have to be honest here -- I have no clue what it is supposed to be. Some kind of manifold or something. And it was discovered ... uhmm, somewhere in the Pentagon, I suppose, but that can't actually be determined from the photo. Obviously then it must be debris from Flight 77. To the left, jutting out prominently from a pile of indeterminate debris, and obviously better lit and in much sharper focus than other alleged interior shots of alleged aircraft debris, is what is claimed to be yet another component of a Boeing 757's apparently indestructible landing gear. Whatever."

Well I don't know about the rest of you, but I'M convinced...

:eyes:

[Lithos]

4. Locking

Please do not call out users in your posts

Lithos
DU Moderator