"Pentagon Strike" video ...new and well done

[dbeach]

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/pentagon.htm

bout 7 minutes

[Bolo Boffin]

1. nothing new, still the same propaganda

Please refer to one of the previous 75 threads on this subject. Thanks.

[dbeach]

2. sorry ....new I meant as in new site???

I think?

I am confused as to why is it propaganda?

[Bolo Boffin]

5. Oh. Well, that is new...

And it's propanganda because of how it cherrypicks its information. There isn't a witness quoted who believes anything other than Flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

My favorite part of the movie is when it talks about the employees of the Sheraton watching the video over and over again in horror until the FBI shows up to confiscate it. I ask you: why aren't these people speaking out against the idea that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?

Because Flight 77 hit the Pentagon, and they know it, because they watched it over and over again.

Propaganda.

[dbeach]

6. Why?

cuz it wuld expose 9/11 for the corporat raid on the US taxpayer that it is...

MIHOP and I do say the video looked good ..looks are only skin deep

"why aren't these people speaking out against the idea that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?"

cuz most who are'nt part of the scheme tend to have accidents ,mysterious illness,selective silence ...

[yodermon]

7. *yawn*

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=39011#39369

Windows above the entry hole, where tail fin should have been, are unbroken. How can this be?

[dbeach]

8. CIA Majic??

Alqaeda= All CIA Duh!

[meppie-meppie not]

13. very clever

and so true!

[Frederik]

16. If you'll allow me to correct you

I'm not married to the idea of anything other than F77 hitting the Pentagon by any means, but there were witnesses who claimed it was a smaller plane. And, obviously, none of the witnesses would have been able to tell whether it was Flight 77 or not. They saw a plane for a second or so going very fast. That's it. I don't trust them to remember correctly much more detail than that.

[demodewd]

3. 75?

75? Did you count them all? :)

[Bolo Boffin]

4. Well, you would think...

:)

[splat@14]

9. So if #77 didn't hit the Pentagon, where did it go?

[Bolo Boffin]

10. This is not a problem for true believers.

I believe the answer will be "That's not our problem. All we have to show is that Flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon."

Which they are light years from doing. But the faithful perservere...

[philb]

11. There were witnesses with statements relevant to this question.

But there doesn't appear to have been any follow-up investigation.

One site with some info is the
911physics site.

There is other info among the statements of those in DC that day, and
some witnesses walking on a beach who saw what appeared to be some interesting practice flights for the real thing to come later.

here is one version among several such that ties with some of the witness statements:


http://physics911.ca/modules/news/article.php?storyid=2

[splat@14]

12. Thanks, site looks interesting.

The origin of this thread seems valid but if its true, somebody has an extra 757 sitting around the families of the passengers involved should not be missing anyone.

Thanks again, I'll review that site when I get home from work today.

[meppie-meppie not]

14. oh I think they are definitely dead but not from flying into the Pentagon

[hack89]

15. And of course you can prove this? nt

[Roland99]

17. And where is Barbara Olson?

[dbeach]

18. Ted Olson received the phone call from her

BUT there is no record of her phone call ..so Olsons word becomes the focal pt for this part of the govt story..

Given that Olson helped Busfraud in 11/00 coup and argued before Scalia which should have been a conflict of interest { as olson was his intern}..Does olson have credibility on the 9/11 phone call ??