Is DU9/11 monitored by intellingence organizations?

[Rob Conn]

It surprises me that they let me get away with this. But hey, maybe this really is a democratc underground after all. - R.C.

[Rob Conn]

1. Intellingence?

Sorry 'bout that.

[hack89]

2. Why?

There hasn't been anything new on this board in three years - just new people recycling the same old stuff.

[spooked911]

3. That may be, but it doesn't mean the FBI isn't interested in who the

dissidents are.

[Rob Conn]

4. Because...

I obviously agree with Spooped, and would also add that there ARE new facts and considerations being dicussed here. In the last week Paul Thompson has posted many new entries for his timeline, and in the last month since I got into this, my understanding has developed. I know that you've been in here for some time. Can you honestly say that no progress toward greater understanding has occurred? If nothing else, new members are learning from the old.

You seem to feign ignorance about the many reasons why intelligence agencies would want to monitor this site. They may want to keep tabs on those who posess certain beliefs. They many want to track the development of certain hypotheses. They many want to track the exposer of different facts. They many want to determine who is most committed to education. They may be monitoring discussion to determine if our speculation is likely to violate national security. More than likely, if they are monitoring this forum, they hope to determine who is taking any action. Anyone who questions the 'official' version is a dissident in certain ways. Why would they pass up the opportunity to examine our viewpoints and plans in such a confined space. We virutally hand it to them on a platter. But hey, they can have it. I'm not hiding anymore. - R.C.

P.S. You have revealed yourself in the past to be one who does not accept many of the hypotheses discussed here, so it follows that you would find no development. And since we're on the subject, and you so willingly reveal your attitude, why are you here at all? What do you get out of this? I would really like to know why you do this, because in all honesty, it appears that you simply derive pleasure from playing devil's advocate. While I will readily state that this role is valuable to us, being as that there are many in here who have not vetted their suppositions very well, I haven't seen you take a very educational approach. Instead you seem to often make short smarmy comments meant to goad a response. Help me understand why you keep coming back.

[DrDebug]

5. I second the question by Rob Conn. Why are you here?

I already told you in the last discussion, that I am sceptical about what you are doing. Somehow this seems to confirm this.

I may not be on this forum constantly - I merely drop by now and then, but I have seen quite a lot of new points being discovered here and even more important theories proven beyond what I consider reasonable doubt.

As far as the poll goes. My answer is of course "Yes". I would be highly disappointed if they didn't monitor this forum (and the rest of the site as well, but this place in particular). And I don't consider it paranoia either. I have nothing nothing to hide, but my identity and that applies to most of the DU'ers. Everything I learn, think and conclude is posted so my thoughts are public knowledge.

Edit: I'm talking about this: http://www.universalway.org/Foreign/truthsuppression.html

Read the document. Your posts exactly follow everything mentioned in the document, yet you sound very intelligent as well and not like somebody wanting to disrupt a place for the pleasure of disrupting.

[hack89]

6. I enjoy this forum - nothing more and nothing less. (nt)

[Name removed]

7. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[hack89]

8. I just take that to mean I ask too many questions you couldn't answer.

And why am I lucky?

[DrDebug]

9. No, because you were wasting my time

A discussion only has some use if the two viewpoints can be combined, since you only attacked my views with questions - and questions requiring too much work from my side - and weren't bothered to defend your side, it is a waste of time IMO.

I can spend a long time searching or answering people if I can educate them or help them or if they can help me / educate me. However if none of those points is present I've learned not to bother.

For example: I first came to this forum because I had doubts, severe doubts about 9/11 but I didn't have a clear mental picture of what happened. After talking a bit and listening to the people here (especially Spooked911 was an amazing help who volunteered an incredible amount of information) I could make up my mind about what happened.

There are many things which I don't know in detail. It doesn't bother me, because the overall picture is clear. I am convinced that 9/11 is MIHOP. And I'm convinced that the BFEE is behind it. That's one of the major reasons for being here.

You might call me a radical, but that's not me either. I am very radical in the view that BFEE/PNAC/Bilderberg/Illuminati/Skull&Bones etc. have started illegal wars and attacks on citizens to provoke conflict and as a means to establish NWO under BFEE. This is very very radical.

Yet I also believe that the police, CIA, military are very necessary! But their mission should be protect against aggression and never to engage in aggression for political purposes. That's what I mean with not "Anti-Warrior"!

[hack89]

11. Then please continue to ignore me - bye (nt)

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[ROH]

18. This one is illuminating...

14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best items qualifying for rule 10. (Rule 10 is: "Associate opponent charges with old news.")

[Frederik]

17. Hmm, that's strange

because I frequently see new information and hypotheses posted here, and you are usually among the first to respond to those posts.

[Robb]

12. No.

At least, I wouldn't.

Intelligence is a numbers game. Monitoring posters here would be akin to monitoring prank callers. Statistically, people who post to message boards are as likely to actually cause trouble as people who make threatening phone calls.

A few do, but most don't.

[Rob Conn]

13. Hmm...

Interesting hypothesis, but not very convincing. While intelligence might be a numbers game, your comparison between posters and prank callers is mysterious. The two are hardly comparable. Would you care to exand on that thought? - R.C.

[DrDebug]

14. Robb's intelligence file

Robb: Male
Activity overview: Spends many hours talking bollocks in the lounge of DU
Assessment: Robb is a Dingbat

http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/index.php/Dingbat

[LARED]

15. The FBI has a new way to track terrorists

They are now able to see every click they make on the internet. Privacy advocates say this is bad, but the FBI says you will never even notice, and it won't affect the common man at all.

http://users.chartertn.net/tonytemplin/FBI_eyes/

[Rob Conn]

16. Humor...Thank God!!! -. Check the link

Thanks for the laugh. Of course I think that if they wanted to, they really could track individuals with that level of detail. - R.C.

[dbeach]

19. yes

question is how many "monitors" are going to stay in line with the fascist busheviks and whereever thay are steering this US of A and how many may catch something here that opens their minds /hearts to the reality of the busheviks that they are anything but a Freedom loving American bunch of Patriots..

so hello to fbi cia nsa and all govt intell..and a friendly reminder that the occupant in chief is a suspected arch criminal..