Time to Lay Down Your Cards: How Were Twin Towers Brought Down?

[spooked911]

[mirandapriestly]

1. This is One Of the Stories

that makes me think it was explosives. This link isn't that legit sounding, but this has been in main stream media, but you know how they disappear. This expert said that the buildings were brought down by explosives; then he met with Pentagon Officials. Then he retracted his story and his University Project got millions of dollars from the government.
EXPLOSIVES PLANTED IN TOWERS,
NEW MEXICO TECH EXPERT SAYS

Posted: 14 September 2001
By Olivier Uyttebrouck, Journal Staff Writer

Televised images of the attacks on the World Trade Center
suggest that explosives devices caused the collapse of both
towers, a New Mexico Tech explosion expert said Tuesday.
The collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to
be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures,
said Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico
Institute of Mining and Technology.

"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the
airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some
explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the
towers to collapse," Romero said. Romero is a former
director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing
Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and
the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and
other structures.

http://www.world-action.co.uk/explosives.html

[spooked911]

2. Yes, I heard of that guy. No doubt he was coerced into changing his story

[Christophera]

3. Easier To Say For People If They Knew The Correct Structure

With a concrete core, plane impacts mean less, fire means less, the instant fracture aspect means free fall is possible. If it is to fracture and enable that then the explosives must be centralized and optimally distributed,............ you know the rest, I hope.

[spooked911]

4. Ten out of seventeen people disbelieve the ofifical story so far

no big surprise I suppose.

Any more votes?

[ROH]

5. And one person voted for "don't know"

so I think that person must be indicating that he or she doesn't accept the OS (or doesn't know the OS, which seems unlikely)?