|
The NIST has such a huge conflict of interest, that one wonders why anyone would expect an 'objective' treatment in regard to 9/11. The organization is industry for industry by industry. Its most likely run by Republicans, and I guarantee that the report won't in any way contradict anything in the Commission Report. I would be totally amazed. In fact it seems that most of the engineers supporting the offical story have industrial or political conflicts of interest. So do we simply believe what it says because it looks 'official', or do we acknowledge that these people most likely have a major bias, and very little reason to tell the truth.
Even the idea of a report about WTC7 is laughable. You already know it will suppport the unreasonable supposition that the diesel in the basement brought down the building, despite the fact that the ignition of that diesel would have caused far more smoke than is present in the video evidence, and likely would have blown out a couple of windows. Its almost like I can tell you ahead of time what these reports will say. I guarantee that they will not derivate from the official story in any way, but only serve to better develop that story.
Yes, people do know when to keep their mouth shut. Yes, people can and do know exactly which story they are supposed to tell, with no direct instruction. Yes, people know exactly who is their boss, and what that boss wants. Yes, the people in power, the bosses, do lie and cheat and break the rules. And yes, most of us simply demonstrate no global awareness or morality in our priorities and actions. There is genocidal bias at work every day, and the U.S., recently retaken by Europe, is the king of the hill, so our bias rules.
Don't be mainstream. Don't think that you can be an informed citizen simply by reading The New York Times or, or listening to Brian Williams or Robert Seigle, or by reviewing the NIST report. All of these sources have identifiable mainstream biases that indicate, with a high level of predictability, how they will respond to stimuli. The essence of conservative ideology. Of course they call these biases 'biblical virtues', or 'pragmatic necessities toward a virtuous end', or whatever's in vogue this year. But the basic framework remains the same. They tell us what to think about, and we are either passive, or we actively defend the system. And there we have your average mainstream progressive and conservative. Passive and defensive. None of these people are well informed citizens, and therefore, none of them are prepared to maintain our democratic society.
Today the mainstream is a cultural wasteland. Do you defend the downfall of our potential for democracy, or are you prepared to face the challenges of contradiction? Do you defend a corrupt system in self interest, or are you prepared to care about the next generation? The lines have been drawn. Those who will not be skeptical of the NIST and what it reports will find that their view is supported, and will have essentially learned nothing. Those who are skeptical will have new evidence with which to examine the tactics of industry in this battle for the soul of our nation.
Be normal, and be forgotten. A new time has come. A time in which philosophy comes into the public discourse. A time for fundamental priorities to be expressed and allowed to foster change. The mainstream fights that change. But the boss fights it with ever more deadly consequences. WHO DO YOU TRUST??? And why? Conflict of interest pervades our culture. You can't ignore it. Face the truth of all our lies. - R.C.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(136 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
