Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret Service people died in WTC7?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
John Doe II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 02:57 PM
Original message
Secret Service people died in WTC7?
The article of Prison Planet says:

We know for a fact that although the building had been evacuated there were still secret service personel in the building who died when it collapsed. They weren’t told to evacuate.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/220605silversteinresponds.htm

Does anybody have further infos on this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. but , but, but....
Pull it... means evacuate

where is the chorus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. After the fact explanations that word usage was non-standard should be
looked on rather sceptically
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. What were they doing at WTC7?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
philb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Why would the Secret Service have their largest office at WTC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Good question!
Edited on Sat Jun-25-05 09:39 PM by spooked911
It doesn't make much sense, does it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. There was one SS personal listed as dead
Edited on Sat Jun-25-05 03:53 PM by LARED
early on in the New York papers

No link, as it's a Lexus Nexus search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. NYT Article: Secret C.I.A. Site in New York Was Destroyed on Sept. 11
Edited on Sat Jun-25-05 08:25 PM by undeterred
http://www.geocities.com/streakingobject/07CIA.html

By JAMES RISEN The New York Times ---- November 4, 2001

WASHINGTON, Nov.. 3 — The Central Intelligence Agency's clandestine New York station was destroyed in the Sept. 11 attack on the World Trade Center, seriously disrupting United States intelligence operations while bringing the war on terrorism dangerously close to home for America's spy agency, government officials say.

The C.I.A.'s undercover New York station was in the 47-story building at 7 World Trade Center, one of the smaller office towers destroyed in the aftermath of the collapse of the twin towers that morning.All of the agency's employees at the site were safely evacuated soon after the hijacked planes hit the twin towers, the officials said. The intelligence agency's employees were able to watch from their office windows while the twin towers burned just before they evacuated their own building.

Immediately after the attack, the C.I.A. dispatched a special team to scour the rubble in search of secret documents and intelligence reports that had been stored in the New York station, either on paper or in computers, officials said. It could not be learned whether the agency was successful in retrieving its classified records from the wreckage. A C.I.A. spokesman declined to comment.

The agency's New York station was behind the false front of another federal organization, which intelligence officials requested that The Times not identify. The station was, among other things, a base of operations to spy on and recruit foreign diplomats stationed at the United Nations, while debriefing selected American business executives and others willing to talk to the C.I.A. after returning from overseas. The agency's officers in New York often work undercover, posing as diplomats and business executives, among other things, depending on the nature of their intelligence operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bismillah Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. With friends like these...
So, as reported by no less august an organ than the NYT, there was a huge team of paid liars and spies (their secrecy guaranteed by law) working "behind the false front of another federal organization" in a massive steel-framed building that collapsed for no discernible reason just a few hundred yard from the Twin Towers.

Good to know they all got out safely.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Welcome, Bismillah
And the 911 Commission had nothing at all to say about WTC7, which in itself is pretty strange.

I'm not sure if the NYT article is accurate or not. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The presence of the CIA office in WTC7 gives a perfect excuse
for the hyper-security of the whole site during the cleanup of ground zero, come to think of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bismillah Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. With friends like these...
So - as reported by no less august an organ than the NYT - there was a huge team of highly-paid liars and spies (their secrecy guaranteed by law) working incognito "behind the false front of another federal organization" (unnamed) in a massive steel-framed building that collapsed for no discernible reason just a few hundred yard from the Twin Towers.

Anyway, only a conspiracy theorist would wonder what they were up to, and it's good to know they all got out safely. Now, nearly four years later, Porter Goss has "an excellent idea" where Osama bin Laden and his dialysis machine are hiding. He just can't do anything about it, the poor guy. Boy, he must be itching to get his hands on him.

http://www.truthout.org/docs_04/102004V.shtml

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bismillah Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Pardon the double post - and "undeterred" makes an excellent point:
"The presence of the CIA office in WTC7 gives a perfect excuse
for the hyper-security of the whole site during the cleanup of ground zero, come to think of it."

Yes. But of course that excuse has never been publicly given, and never will be. I've long felt that the true sickness of the US is the cancerous growth of government secrecy since WWII. (Britain, of course, is even more of a cryptocracy, but a hell of a lot less powerful, so it matters less.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Welcome!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bismillah Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Venceremos!
Thanks, Spooked. I've been lurking on this board for some time, and you guys have posted some fascinating material.

I have a strong impression that skepticism is growing, and gradually becoming "respectable". Here's to a renaissance of grass-roots democracy on the fourth anniversary of 9/11.

Truth out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. What a great find! Thanks!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. The "Secret Service" is not part of the CIA is it?
Prison Planet is referring to Secret Serice, and the NYT article to CIA. How are these two agencies related (if at all)?

Today, the Secret Service is authorized by law to protect:
* the President, the Vice President, (or other individuals next in order of succession to the Office of the President), the President-elect and Vice President-elect;
* the immediate families of the above individuals;
* former Presidents, their spouses for their lifetimes, except when the spouse re-marries. In 1997, Congressional legislation became effective limiting Secret Service protection to former Presidents for a period of not more than 10 years from the date the former President leaves office.
* children of former presidents until age 16;
* visiting heads of foreign states or governments and their spouses traveling with them, other distinguished foreign visitors to the United States, and official representatives of the United States performing special missions abroad;
* major Presidential and Vice Presidential candidates, and their spouses within 120 days of a general Presidential election.

http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC