9/11 was an inside job. Keep it simple and repeat, right Karl?

[OKthatsIT]

Video: "Secret Evil of 9/11" (20 min)
http://plaguepuppy.net/public_html/video%20archive/Secret-Evil-of-911.wmv

[Proud_Lefty]

1. WOWWWWWWWWW

[OKthatsIT]

5. Its the best short impact video so far.

I highy recommend this for the friends and whole family!

[oblivious]

2. Wow. What a frightening compilation.

How anyone could watch this and read the 911 research and believe the official conspiracy theory is beyond me. I mean, one or two inconsistencies, ok, but thousands? Holes big enough for a planet to sail through?

I believe these 911 researchers are the reason there hasn't been another attack.

Keep repeating.

[corbett]

3. Hours Of Extra Evidence

Refer all doubters to the following:

http://www.reopen911.org/free_dvd.htm

[NoFederales]

4. Can't get link to work

Help with the link please?

NoFederales

[OKthatsIT]

6. Whose link? The video?

? If its the video, you have to allow for download time. Its a Quicktime video embedded in the browser.

[NoFederales]

7. Yes, the video

The screen that appears is full of symbols, perhaps my browser cannot open it properly?

NoFederales

[OKthatsIT]

8. try this link, instread

http://www.question911.com.nyud.net:8090/per82fw8987023f08dwf033e08f/SecretEvilOf911.wmv

[philb]

14. I have same problem? computer says takes over 1 hour to download??

[philb]

9. my computer says the file takes over an hour to download?

what does the evidence show?

[oblivious]

10. Former Asst. Sec. Of Treasury Under Reagan Doubts Official 9/11 Story

Former Asst. Sec. Of Treasury Under Reagan Doubts Official 9/11 Story; Claims Neo Con Agenda Is As 'Insane As Hitler And Nazi Party When They Invaded Russia In Dead Of Winter'

June 22, 2005

By Greg Szymanski

A former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan stepped back into the political spotlight this week, expressing doubt about the official 9/11 story and claiming "if they lied to us about Ruby Ridge, Waco and weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, why should we believe them now."

...Roberts said the recent statements made by Reynolds, however, reveals just how flimsy and unbelievable the government story comes across.

"This is not some kind of conspiracy nut or kook talking. He is a man with extremely qualified credentials, whose opinions I respect," said Roberts referring to Reynolds’ comments which have been highly publicized across the country.

"The real story is not Morgan Reynolds or myself, but why have so many former Republican conservatives and top ranking officials who disagree with the neo cons been systematically run out of Washington? And, also, why is the media so intent on covering up the Bush-neo con agenda and all the mistakes surrounding it?

http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/article/1518131/27928.htm

[Ezlivin]

11. Good video, terrible spelling

How can someone spend a great deal of time editing video, but not spend a few minutes proofing his/her spelling?

Official is not spelled "offical".

The word "it's" means "it is" and nothing else.

Explosive is not spelled "expolsive".

Afghanistan is not spelled "Afganistan".

It's a pity that such hard work has to be blemished by such poor copy editing.

[RedSock]

13. i agree -- sloppy

If you are that careless with spelling simple words, how can I trust you took the time to be careful with anything else?

It may seem like nit-picking, but it really rankles me -- and it *will* turn people off. Hell, I believe in MIHOP and it turns me off!

Like that video that had the Pentagon crash at 8:38 am. Unbelievable.

[undeterred]

21. Beam is not spelled "beem"

Excellent video though.

[JackRiddler]

12. Here's something much better, imho, with same message...

http://bushflash.com/swf/wtc.swf

[philb]

15. I like this one- simple and persuasive

Is anyone really suggesting this was caused by a pancake effect??

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/mushrooming.html

Exploding and disintegrating is a better discription of what happened to the towers than collapse.

[Tobias]

16. It is BULLSHIT

I didn´t see a bigger Bullshit for years.

Let´s look at the first part of the film:

Right at the beginning of this part it claims:

WTC building 7:
This building has two small fires on its side.

That´s nonsense:

it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good.
http://www.firehouse.com/terrorist/911/magazine/gz/boyle.html

Nethertheless, the claim of only "small fires" is the basis of the complete WTC 7 story of that film.

It´s ridiculous.

I wonder how people can believe this.

[pauldp]

17. No. What's bullshit is that there is no official story for the collapse.

I've seen the footage from several angles including the cutter charges going off, AND heard Silverstein's gaff. Come on. even if there were huge fires, It was controlled demo. If it wasn't then it was the most unique collapse of a steel building in history and architects all over the world should re-think how they build steel buildings.

What's bullshit also is that the media ignored the most anomalous collapse of a building from fire in history.

What's bullshit is that people are told not to believe their eyes and ears and take to word of a criminal administration instead.

But you gotta give 'em kudos for deviousness. A brialliant ballsy plan. They just got sloppy with WTC 7.

[philb]

19. Do you have any pictures of the damage to the south side of WTC7?

There must be some pictures of the extensive damage.

The pictures I've seen don't seem to show damage to the extent described in the article you quoted. Does Firehouse Magazine have any?
Are there any other witnesses who describe damage this extensive?


This is the only picture of South side I'm aware of:

FEMA's report claimed that significant fires were visible on the building's south side, without providing any evidence. The photograph below, taken in the afternoon, shows the upper half of Building 7 from the south. There are no signs of fire.

Despite the fact that the fires in Building 7 were insignificant compared to other office fires, a decision was made not to fight them. The government has never explained that decision.

http://www.wtc7.net/b7fires.html

[Tobias]

18. It is BULLSHIT - part 2

Let´s look at part 2 of the film.

It starts with the claim:

Melting point of steel: 1535 degree Celsius

Wrong.

Where does the producer of this film get his chuzpe from?

It´s unbelievable.

Still wondering, how some people are impressed by that.



(By the way: the "bum bum bum bum" is perfectly explained by the pancake-effect. But it is impossible to explain that with explosives...)

[philb]

20. What caused the molten steel in the residue at WTC towers, including WTC7?

What caused the molten steel in the residue at WTC towers?
http://www.seau.org/SEAUNews-2001-10.pdf
http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/radio/youreyesdontlie/index.html
http://home.comcast.net/~skydrifter/wtc.htm

New York Sanitation Workers had to haul off molten steel beams
http://www.wasteage.com/mag/waste_dday_ny_sanitation/

Hot spots in WTC residue too hot for gasoline fires
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/ofr-01-0429/thermal.r09.html

[philb]

22. More on temperatures- jet engines are made of steel and don't melt or

deform; the fires at WTC were not nearly as hot as in engines

Firefighters: WTC2 fires small and controllable http://edition.cnn.com/2002/US/08/04/wtc.firefighters / http://thememoryhole.org/911/firefighter-tape-excerpts.htm http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/09/nyregion/09TAPE.html?ex=1118548800&en=3a5271dc64a05dfa&ei=5070&oref=login http://www.letsroll911.org/articles/controlleddemolition.html http://www.freedomisforeverybody.org/911physics.php http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=45004&mesg_id=45133