We can't prove what happened on 9/11 and we don't need to

[undeterred]

Most of the evidence has been forever destroyed. We do not have access to the videotapes, black boxes, air traffic controller testimony, or any of the physical evidence that would be necessary to definitively establish what happened on September 11. The crime scenes have already been looted and witnesses silenced.

If the 9/11 theories seem a little "out there", and some of them do, its because most of what there is to work with are witness reports and photographs, as well as the specialized knowledge of people in relevant fields.

There may be many more people who have knowledge about individual pieces of this puzzle who will eventually come forward. But surely there are some who live with too much fear.

Is it difficult to believe that people within the US government would deliberately stage an attack on our country, killing thousands of civilians? Is it difficult to believe that they would invent a fantastic lie within hours of the attacks that would be used to justify pre-emptive war and the erosion of respect for civil rights and human rights? Its painful to believe, but the longer this administration is in power, the easier it is for me to believe that everything we have been told about who is responsible for the attacks on September 11 is a lie.

And there is more than enough evidence left and inconsistency in the official story to strongly suggest that the official story as a whole is a fantastic lie.

[philb]

1. Lots of evidence against official story but public hasn't seen it

So people have to do a better job of that. Its sufficient to establish that there was complicity by some officials. And thats well documented already, and supported by officials testimony to the 9/11 Commission:

http://www.flcv.com/offcom77.html
http://www.flcv.com/offcom93.html
http://www.flcv.com/offcom11.html
http://www.flcv.com/offco175.html