|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
proiowadem (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-05 07:09 PM Original message |
WTC building 7's collapse. What is the truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
1. The owner admitted he had it pulled, and there's other support for Demolit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 12:14 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Accounts of heavy damage from on scene firefighters.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 12:16 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Interesting... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 12:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Here is a good description.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 02:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. If that's the case... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 04:31 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. You are talking nonsense.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Doe II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 04:40 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Do you have more than one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 06:10 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I have a better idea.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 06:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Here is one picture of a pristine WTC7. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 10:54 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. See the South face in afternoon on the post below, no big damage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 05:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Where is the picture? Was it deleted? I'd love to see it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 12:09 AM Response to Reply #16 |
106. picture of south face of WTC7 in afternoon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Doe II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-05 11:22 AM Response to Reply #10 |
20. Hack, Hack, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Doe II (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 04:43 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. Hack II |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 01:35 PM Response to Reply #21 |
26. Will three more be OK? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 03:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. O.K |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 05:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. So what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:42 AM Response to Reply #28 |
39. The "so what!" rebuttal means nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. Lets solve this mystery together, shall we... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 04:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. You said it!...........a mystery. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 05:12 PM Response to Reply #48 |
54. I didn't think you had anything to contribute. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #54 |
59. Except direct photographic evidence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:22 PM Response to Reply #59 |
63. Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. No steel-frame highrise has EVER collapsed due to fire |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:44 PM Response to Reply #66 |
67. Totally irrelevant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:52 PM Response to Reply #67 |
69. Show me the "20 story gouge" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:05 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. Read post 2 and 26... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 08:16 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. I said show me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 09:17 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Thanks for the laugh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 09:28 PM Response to Reply #73 |
74. The official story is based on hearsay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 01:54 AM Response to Reply #71 |
108. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously inaccurate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 07:29 AM Response to Reply #108 |
112. Entire "smoking gun" threads in this forum.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 02:12 AM Response to Reply #112 |
119. I notice you didn't answer my question. Did anyone else notice that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 11:50 AM Response to Reply #119 |
123. Look at post 121 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 12:12 PM Response to Reply #54 |
77. You thought wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #77 |
80. From the NIST report |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 04:41 PM Response to Reply #80 |
87. Wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:04 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. I have more faith in NIST than I do in you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:25 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. The NIST have no photos of the south wall.Period. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:44 PM Response to Reply #93 |
96. Cool! Your first picture shows something else. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 01:50 AM Response to Reply #42 |
107. Why wasn't ANY actual metal salvaged from WTC7 for NIST's study? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 07:26 AM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Wonder no more! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 08:02 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. No...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 08:12 AM Response to Reply #113 |
114. A second source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 01:34 PM Response to Reply #114 |
116. Just one man assigned to examine 300 000 tons of WTC rubble! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 01:46 PM Response to Reply #116 |
117. Did you even read my post? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 04:11 PM Response to Reply #117 |
118. Yeah!............they examined the steel identified by Asteneh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 09:50 AM Response to Reply #118 |
122. Where does is say that he is the only one looking at the steel. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Adstaneh says he was the only one.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 12:28 PM Response to Reply #124 |
125. Pretty weak but OK .. you win. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 01:26 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. Rubbish.......it is FEMA 's/ACSE's samples that are weak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 01:37 PM Response to Reply #126 |
127. Ok - you win again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 01:48 PM Response to Reply #127 |
128. No......we lose............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 06:40 PM Response to Reply #128 |
130. It's important that you get the last word, isn't ? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seatnineb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 04:35 PM Response to Reply #130 |
137. It is important to prove............ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 04:49 PM Response to Reply #137 |
138. Here...I'll give you another opportunity. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 04:26 AM Response to Reply #111 |
120. I notice that you failed to answer my question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 09:37 AM Response to Reply #120 |
121. Thanks for the info... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 03:45 PM Response to Reply #121 |
129. And what was the source of the sulfur, pray tell? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-24-05 06:43 PM Response to Reply #129 |
131. Good question - show me a modern high explosive that has sulfur.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 12:14 AM Response to Reply #131 |
132. Yes, it must have been acid rain. That's the ticket! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 10:46 AM Response to Reply #132 |
134. Sorry - guess I need to be more specific.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 12:41 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. And what are blasting cap detonators made of again? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #135 |
136. Feel better now? ......Good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 11:06 AM Response to Reply #134 |
153. And this acid rain got to the columns.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mandog (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 01:12 PM Response to Reply #153 |
154. What about the explosives and detonators? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petgoat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 02:17 PM Response to Reply #154 |
155. Sulfur Source |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 04:42 PM Response to Reply #155 |
156. Gypsum in the sheet rock |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 05:28 PM Response to Reply #26 |
30. I must say that is a great find-- I don't know why no one has uncovered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 05:45 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Did you read the NIST report? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 08:51 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I read the report-- basically, they have no idea what initiated the global |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:18 PM Response to Reply #34 |
35. Show me a good source for the speed of collapse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 10:13 AM Response to Reply #35 |
40. just watch any video of the event |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 02:57 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Lets do some math.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 03:14 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Here's the math! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 03:39 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. But didn't the collapse of WTC7 start at the bottom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 04:29 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. The failures would need to be in all floors at the same time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 04:38 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. It falls straight down. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 05:11 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Gravity and a lot of weight.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 05:51 PM Response to Reply #53 |
57. Here is a simple experiment to demonstrate why it can't be vertical. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:18 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Because, unlike a building, the can is one homogeneous piece of metal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 10:52 PM Response to Reply #62 |
75. An empty pop can is not homogeneous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 01:45 PM Response to Reply #75 |
81. You would be right IF.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:28 PM Response to Reply #47 |
65. Couldn't controlled demo have taken out that column? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:47 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. So you agree.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 04:56 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Deleted message |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 07:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Here's what 18-hour fires do to steel-frame skyscrapers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:02 AM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Do we know that they were of similar construction? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:23 AM Response to Reply #6 |
24. No --an accelerated collapse would not argue against controlled demolition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 08:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
13. A good way to corroborate this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-05 05:58 AM Response to Reply #13 |
17. How silly of me.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-05 08:02 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. I was being serious and constructive... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 05:39 PM Response to Reply #17 |
56. So, where do they get the oxygen? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
64. Perhaps all that debris falling on the south side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 10:46 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Strange/conflicting accounts everywhere. Small fires>> What is the truth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 10:24 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. Couple of questions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 05:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. WTC 7 Fire pictures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 06:03 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. Do you have a source for these? Windows look wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 06:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
58. That isn't WTC7, it's WTC5 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 07:54 PM Response to Reply #58 |
70. Thanks. I didn't think it was WTC7 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackRiddler (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 04:57 PM Response to Original message |
9. Commission Report & NIST |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-17-05 10:51 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. How could they rig it for "pulling" so quick when it was evacuated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StrafingMoose (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-18-05 08:06 AM Response to Reply #15 |
19. That's another question I have regarding "pull it" of WTC7... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 09:54 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. That would be my guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:35 AM Response to Reply #15 |
25. Have you checked out this video? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 04:19 PM Response to Reply #25 |
49. Jeff King is NOT an MIT scientist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 05:04 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. OK so he's got a science degree from MIT. Speaking of credentials... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 04:53 AM Response to Reply #52 |
76. So would you agree his opinion carries no more weight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pauldp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 12:31 PM Response to Reply #76 |
78. I guess I'd want to see his CV and resume before I start doing things like |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 12:51 PM Response to Reply #78 |
79. Follow that decision, and you have your criminal(s). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 11:07 PM Response to Reply #79 |
146. This is exactly right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-20-05 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
37. I think the "truth" is that it was an asbestos liability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bassman79 (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 12:00 AM Response to Original message |
38. Just watch the video of the collapse... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 03:07 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. And how many controlled demolitions.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 03:21 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. It was VERY similar to the controlled demolition of the Pruitt-Igoe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 03:32 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. Excellent picture of pyroclastic flow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 05:14 PM Response to Reply #46 |
55. Pyroclastic flows? Volcanic erruptions is an interesting theory! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 06:22 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-21-05 06:31 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. They got better with practice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Papa (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 02:15 PM Response to Original message |
82. I don't think I've seen it mentioned in this thread but what about the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 02:29 PM Response to Reply #82 |
83. If I remember correctly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 02:42 PM Response to Reply #83 |
84. Deleted message |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 03:34 PM Response to Reply #84 |
85. But they were part of the plot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Papa (505 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 04:33 PM Response to Reply #85 |
86. They were interviewed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:00 PM Response to Reply #86 |
89. Interviewed by a Nazi? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
philb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 12:03 AM Response to Reply #89 |
105. Not as you suggest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 08:29 AM Response to Reply #105 |
115. So we both agree there were hot fires in the rubble pile .. good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 04:57 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. Hot spots? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:07 PM Response to Reply #88 |
91. Read my post 89 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:25 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Where was the "red hot steel?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #92 |
95. So a picture showing a tiny fraction of the WTC proves what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 05:34 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. I do not know what they used to explode the buildings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 06:05 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. Good discriptions of the smouldering fires at ground zero: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 06:28 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. Here is the September 16 thermal image |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 06:53 PM Response to Reply #99 |
100. Because there were fires burning at ground zero.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 07:19 PM Response to Reply #100 |
102. When I don't know who says what and what story to believe... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 07:30 PM Response to Reply #102 |
103. I understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 06:18 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. smoked out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 07:09 PM Response to Reply #84 |
101. Nice article. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-22-05 07:36 PM Response to Reply #101 |
104. Do you go to neo -Nazi web sites for all your scientific analysis? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 02:52 AM Response to Reply #104 |
109. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-23-05 07:21 AM Response to Reply #109 |
110. Deleted message |
stickdog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 12:42 AM Response to Reply #104 |
133. When you don't like the message, kill the messenger. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 05:09 PM Response to Reply #133 |
139. The message was fucked up too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
janedoe (540 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 05:58 PM Response to Reply #139 |
140. Excellent evidence! - Thanks for posting it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 06:12 PM Response to Reply #140 |
141. Why would there be a constant amplitude? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LARED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 10:58 AM Response to Reply #140 |
152. A few points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 06:12 PM Response to Reply #139 |
142. so what are your credentials for reading seismographs? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 06:24 PM Response to Reply #142 |
143. I am not an expert... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spooked911 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 11:03 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. the original graph was not a distortion, it was just a different way of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boxerfan (710 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 12:35 AM Response to Reply #143 |
147. Hack 89 you are a plant. That much is obvious.You fool no one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 06:21 AM Response to Reply #147 |
148. Are you calling me a traitor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 09:26 AM Response to Reply #148 |
149. Deleted message |
hack89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 10:43 AM Response to Reply #149 |
150. Thanks for the laugh! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
carlvs (165 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jul-26-05 10:49 AM Response to Reply #150 |
151. Nuts! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pox americana (622 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-25-05 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
144. I think the truth is pretty obvious. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC