New amomalies regarding the Pentagon crash or explosions

[philb]

1. What caused the collapse of the C Ring at the Pentagon since the plane did not hit that area?

http://www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gpentagondetail/frame.htm


2. Is the official Pentagon Scenario consistent with this Video, regarding 757 engine exhaust effects?

http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/simulation.mpeg


3. The Pentagon plane hit the only “100 foot long” section in the whole Pentagon that had been retrofitted with blast proof windows and reinforcement. The chances of this happening randomly are about 1 in 100,000. Did the hijackers just happen to hit the only small section of the Pentagon that had been retrofitted, or was this the plan? Was one part of the plan to test the new construction methods being used in the retrofit?

Or was this done to avoid the much larger damage that would have occurred it the hit had been to another area? Or to avoid hitting an area with more important officials?

Or a poor choice or random choice by the hijackers?
http://globalresearch.ca.myforums.net/viewtopic.php?t=834

[philb]

1. What caused major fires on top floors far north of the impact area?

What caused the major fires on the 2 top floors far north of the impact area?



Its my understanding that this is where most of the Naval Intelligence workers were killed and the Auditors that found the $2 trillion missing in recent years from Pentagon budget. Is that correct?


Rumsfeld Buries Admission of Missing 2 Trillion Dollars in 9/10/01 Press Conference
http://911research.wtc7.net/sept11/trillions.html

[MercutioATC]

2. Answers to #1

http://www.pubs.asce.org/ceonline/ceonline03/0203feat.html

[philb]

3. Thanks for a useful reference. But did you look at the picture I supplied

with question 1? is it not consistent with the actual collapse??

The picture I posted, which purports to be of the the collapsed area shows the collapse much deeper than where there was damage to columns from the plane.

what i wanted to know was what caused the collapse where columns weren't damaged?

And what about the other questions?


I have a lot of unaswered questions and the Administration/Pentagon/FBI seem to be deliberately covering up all evidence rather than explaining or documenting what happened.

I've seen the studies with descriptions of the damage.
But they don't answer many of the most important issues.

[philb]

4. Why weren't the Andrews AFB interceptors used on 9/11?

9:05 3 F-16 jets from Andrews AFB were on a training flight in North Carolina but could have been recalled to D.C. before 9:00 AM as the trip takes about 15 minutes

http://billstclair.com/911timeline/main/flight77.html

Why weren't these jets recalled? And why weren't the other Andrews AFB national guard jets ordered scrambled earlier? When the scramble order was given to Andrews jets at 9:40 they were in te air at 9:50 over Washington, along with the jets from Langley sent earlier.

[philb]

5. Why would Arab hijackers choose to hit the area under renovation?

Flight 77 strikes the only portion of the Pentagon that had been recently renovated. "It was the only area of the Pentagon with a sprinkler system, and it had been reconstructed with a web of steel columns and bars to withstand bomb blasts. The area struck by the plane also had blast-resistant windows - 2 inches thick and 2,500 pounds each - that stayed intact during the crash and fire. While perhaps 4,500 people normally would have been working in the hardest-hit areas, because of the renovation work only about 800 were there, mostly construction workers.

Why would the Arab hijackers have gone out of there way to take extreme measures to hit the area they would least prefer to hit?

Or why would they have chosen to hit this area?