Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds changing your access to your safety deposit box in case of panic run.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:05 PM
Original message
Feds changing your access to your safety deposit box in case of panic run.
Has anybody here heard anything about this or should I go get the tinfoil?

http://urbansurvival.com/week.htm

There is no direct link, the story is about 1/2 way down the page.

"First things first: I have had a couple of reports from readers about supposed changes to access to safety deposit boxes and what federal officials have planned as actions in the event of a market run/panic/run on banks/ and so forth. One reader reports running into less-than-cooperative bankers when the reader removed personal items from a safe deposit box. A different reader reported that mysteriously, because the box hadn't been opened in a while, that the keys had been changed without advising the customer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
windy252 Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've heard a few rumors suggesting this,
but I haven't been able to confirm it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dare I ask...
is this even legal?:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windy252 Donating Member (742 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You act as if that matters
I wish I didn't have to say that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. They also are planning a full lock down of all public toilets
It's their effort to stop leaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Too late!
Pssssss! :D

:D


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Remember 1929?? Think these idiots didn't learn something? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. Sure they learned something
Edited on Sat Apr-08-06 09:06 PM by Art_from_Ark
Even during a Great Depression, "The (super-)rich get richer, and the poor get poorer."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joneschick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Snopes says "undetermined"
http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/safedeposit.asp

I work for a bank, but I have nothing to do with safe deposit stuff. I think I will be ke.eping my ears open
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I actually heard about it from an investor friend of mine over lunch
a few days ago. He wasn't extremely clear and we had 2 other people at the table, so the comment went by.

I didn't think anything about it till I ran across this.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
TalkingDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Interesting. Thanks for the link.
Our safety deposit box is under our stairs. A string of 1950's era pearls from England are about the most valuable thing in it. Passports, papers and so on.

Hmmm....what an interesting rumour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. I know. What's in a safety deposit box that will affect the economy?
Nothing. It's full of personal jewerly and paper. What you really fear is people going to the bank to close their savings and checking accounts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemInDistress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-18-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
35. I was searching my brain for that link and wow!! there it is...



we thank you..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Think abt it: How would the bank or gov't benefit from denying you
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 08:40 PM by redacted
access to your safety deposit box in the event of some kind of "run" on financial institutions.

It won't.
So why would they do it.

I say tinfoil hat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. gold. valuables. certain papers
lots of reasons.

Still not confirmed, but considering the things they have done that we DO know about...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Ok great. So now the gov't has your gold. How is it that going to
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 08:40 PM by redacted
help the government. The government doesn't need your gold -- it can print money.

A 'run' on the bank is abt withdrawing deposits.

Which if everyone did it would put the bank in a bad place, because they loan that money out.

What is in your safety deposit box is beside the point.

More likely would be that the gov would allow you to have the gold, and then not allow you to sell it. Just like they stop trading stocks during national disasters. Which I might add, is good policy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. While I think the scenarioi is highly unlikely - the risk for the govt
of just printing more money - is extreme deflation. Suddenly the value of the currently is so low that one has to have a huge amount of currency to pay for even basic goods. Has happened a number of times in different areas of the world in the past century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Agreed. My point is that the gov't is really going the benefit from
keeping your goldin the bank, unless the gov't planned on stealing your gold.

If we are in such bad shape that the gov't wants to steal your gold -- it's just not going to matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Not extreme deflation-- just the opposite
Printing unlimited amounts of unbacked money leads to extreme inflation-- just look at Brazil, Argentina, 1990's Serbia, Weimar Republic Germany, to name a few. Deflation can occur when there is too little money in circulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. If the dollar crashes completely, it will be worth less than toilet paper
what good would printing more do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. In that case, they would do what every other inflation-ravaged country
has done-- introduce a "new dollar" revalued at say, 100 or 1000 times the value of the "old dollar"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-16-06 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
34. It helps prop up appearances
that nothing untowards is happening.

If you are willing to go an extra mile here and assume a full-scale propaganda war against the population, then one reason is pretty clear. If the gvt can ensure that people do not remove valuables from banks, then the gvt can officially claim that deposits are secure, that there has been no run on banks, and therefore there is nothing to worry about. This is straight 1984, but this type of manipulation was indeed common in Soviet bloc countries.

Also, I'm no economist, but you cannot just print money at will without devaluing your currency. OTOH, if you can show an ounce of gold for every N dollars fresh off the print, that's another matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Exactly. The money and/or valuables in a safety deposit box
are NOT in the "system" and therefore, removing them from the box has no effect on financial institutions. Why would the government care? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. This doesn't make any sense at all.
A "run on the bank" is a withdrawal of deposits, not emptying a safe deposit box. I can't imagine any ill that's fixed by keeping people from safety deposit boxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Exactly. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Because a run on a bank threatens PAPER money......
and therefore the concept that the paper money is worth "X". Safe deposit boxes in many if not most cases contain tangible wealth: Coins, bullion, gems, bearer instruments, etc.

The entire idea holding up the value of a currency is that the currency is agreed to have intrinsic value. But paper money is, after all, paper. Real intrinsic value is based on what the money represents. In the case of US dollars, it is "The full faith and credit of the United States of America". If that faith and credit is threatened - take for example if OPEC decided tomorrow to trade in only Euros and no longer Dollars or China decided to ask for the yield on all those T-Bills they own TOMORROW, then the value of the currency is undermined. Currency values have fluctuated, risen and declined hundreds of times in history. To think the US Dollar is immune ignores that history.

Tangible wealth would be the first thing a currency in free fall would want to attach itself to. Since we are no longer on the gold standard and even though the US has substantial gold reserves, the currency would be at risk if all of the "Federal reserve notes" were called in to remit their tangible value.

In other words, if everyone asked the government to give them the value of their paper money in tangible wealth - gold, for example, the Treasury simply couldn't do it. The truth is, the real value of your dollars is tied to debt. Inextricably, unfortunately.

Any economist worth his salt would say this is a delicate and dangerous situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Gold?
Didn't they ban owning gold during the depression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yes but money was based on a Gold Standard then. Now it's not.
BTW, that brilliant move of banning gold during the depression is one of the factors that made it the "great depression" rather than -- "the really crappy recession"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
31. Technically, the US withdrew from the Gold Standard in 1934
although vestiges remained until Nixon eliminated them completely in 1971, the same year the last bit of silver was removed from American coinage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. One more thing-- the worst years of the Great Depression are generally
considered to be the years 1930, 31, 32, and 33-- when gold was still circulating as money. The tight connection of the money supply to gold severely restricted the amount of money in circulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. They banned owning gold bullion, but not gold coins
Citizens were still allowed to keep gold coins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SPKrazy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. My Guess Is It Is BS
the likelihood of thousands of bank employees keeping something like this quiet?

no way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. What's interesting is that this rumor is out there
It's an indicator of what people are worrying about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. Only If They are Stupid
"Who knows....!?" - Donald Dumbsfailed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-08-06 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
33. probably fake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC