shanti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:01 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Apr-11-06 08:01 PM by shanti
check out this video i got in my mail today. it's supposedly been pulled from several sites. it breaks down the pentagon crash story very well! http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main(can anybody mirror this?)
|
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Oh, fuck me, not AGAIN! |
shanti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. take a chill pill, dude |
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Disappearing from GD in 5.... 4.... 3.... |
pola
(272 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message |
3. THANKS for posting this !!!!! |
|
It's about time this is getting out... I have been reading this stuff for 2 years now. Glad it is finally getting out in the open.
|
Mz Pip
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
|
a whole lot of it was found.
DNA was found on the victims and there were many witnesses to the crash.
Whatever.
Mz Pip :dem:
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
How dare you interrupt this fine conspiracy thread with FACTS?!? ;-)
|
libertypirate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-12-06 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
16. I am doing research do you have a link? |
|
Not likely, I keep asking but no one ever points to actual evidence... Or are you talking like you know, but you really don't..
Thanks in advance
|
Make7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-12-06 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Here are some links that might help with your research: |
Xithras
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:14 PM
Response to Original message |
6. How many times does this need to be debunked? n/t? |
Redstone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Apparently not enough times. See #4. |
Solomon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. It has never been debunked. |
MrMonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:23 PM
Response to Original message |
|
they've found witnesses who can accurately describe something that they briefly saw by comparing it to something that they've never seen. I'm convinced.
:sarcasm: (added for benefit of the literally-minded).
|
hack89
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. So what does this say about the witnesses who heard ... |
|
explosions at the WTC? How many people have heard real demo charges in real life? They are describing something they briefly heard by comparing it to something they have never heard.
|
MrMonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Apr-12-06 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
15. It raises a question as to whether their reports were reliable. |
gonefishing
(622 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:24 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Ok maybe I'm not that smart... |
|
If flight 77 didn't wind up there where did it and it's 64 pasangers go?
That’s a signpost up ahead: your next stop: The Twilight Zone.
|
Solomon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Oh that's a great reason to believe the official lie. "It must have flown |
|
into the Pentagon because where else could it be".
I am continually amazed by the people whom can't believe there own eyes. That wall on the Pentagon did not collapse until twenty minutes after impact. The freaking wall that the "plane" hit was still intact as firemen were dousing it with water.
Now you can see that with your own eyes. But somehow, the crime is so horrible you can't wrap your minds around the fact that not only was the wall still standing, no burning of the ground, and no plane debris, but you are willing to believe a couple of "witnesses" who said they thought it was a 757 while dismissing a couple of "witnesses" who said it was a missile.
|
shanti
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Apr-11-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
i've always respected your postings - i like your open mind. apparently, this topic is like waving a red cape to many du'ers;) now i know...
you're right about people not being able to wrap their minds around this. it's the same as the wtc. cognitive dissonance. i don't usually post threads on these type of issues, but this british video seems pretty comprehensive. the fact that it is being forwarded to me by people who don't normally do so is proof to me that some of this is sinking into the collective psyche.
and that's a good thing.
peace
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:19 PM
Response to Original message |