Put Options / Proof of 911 Foreknowledge?

[Bushknew]

Has any information come to light about this?

---------------------------------------------------
Before you read this article, conduct this test. Try to purchase some stock, or some futures, a mutual fund or some put options, without providing your identity. Go ahead and try it! See if you get anywhere. Find out what happens when you tell the investment firm that you want to make a huge investment anonymously. It can’t be done.

Then ask yourself this question: How could someone have placed anonymous put options on American Airlines and United Airlines just prior to the attacks of 9/11? Then ask yourself why no one has investigated this suspicious deal. Ask yourself why there has been no attempt by the US government to identify the person who anticipated huge profits from a disaster that was yet to occur. Is it because the trail possibly leads to the CIA?

Someone had foreknowledge of the attacks. In the weeks leading up to 9/11 someone made a series of investments that would have paid off in huge profits because of the attacks. This is well documented and undisputed. This person specifically invested in the two airliners used in the attacks, anticipating windfall profits from any drop in the stock prices of these companies. This is solid evidence that at least one person in the United States had detailed information that something bad was going to happen to the specific airlines that were to be used in the attack.

We have been told that the person who made these investments never claimed the profits. We are expected to believe that this explains why his or her identity is unavailable. This is absolutely untrue. This is not an instance in which someone was waiting to pick up a package at an airport locker. This is a case of a financial institution processing an investment transaction for an individual. This CAN NOT BE PERFORMED ANONYMOUSLY! The identity of this person who had foreknowledge of the attack is know and this person’s identity is being protected by our government and this is a fact! Period, end of story.

WHO MADE THE INVESTMENT? Identify this person and you have someone who very probably had detailed foreknowledge of the events. The fact that the profits were never collected is even more suspicious and incriminating. The fact that the identity of this person remains unknown is even more suspicious. The only possible conclusion is that this person is known to the government and that his or her identity is being protected.

There has been a clear and concerted cover up regarding the person who tried to profit from events he or she knew were coming. The people who could easily clear this up, but who chose to close any further investigation into the matter are not underlings. They are officials who answer directly to the President of the United States.

http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/9_11_-_all_the_proof_you_need.html

[simonm]

1. Chimp's Response

Take a look at this video. Who do you think would be the perfect person to ask?

http://images.indymedia.org/imc/washingtondc/media/video/6/9_11laugh.mpg

[LARED]

2. How do you know the transaction was

done anonymously?

After reading the link for Ruppert Options (http://www.hereinreality.com/insidertrading.html)

It is obvious the guy is clueless about options trading.

- Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options… Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost $5 million.

- On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;… Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about $4 million.

An imbalance between call and put options is NORMAL. See here (http://finance.yahoo.com/q/os?s=APD&m=2006-05-19). It took all of five minutes looking thought stock options to find a company with a large imbalance between calls and puts, .

[Sinti]

3. It's not proof, but it is a piece of evidence in a would-be investigation

The buyers are most certainly known by someone with a reason to know. The fact that they never collected is damning, as well as the fact that the government won't investigate this. If nothing else, this is likely some of the worst kind of economic sabotage. Whether that sabotage was created by the dubious al Qaeda bosses, or someone else with foreknowledge is impossible to say at this point. Truthfully, it's not certain that they had foreknowledge, but their failure to come forward and reap the rewards of their good insight and good luck is enough to raise an eyebrow or 2.

[mirandapriestly]

4. Michael Ruppert shows the close alliance between CIA & Wall Street

in his book.