doesn't the job report for September come out tomorrow?

[Blue_Roses]

who would have it first...

[cidliz2004]

1. YEP!

How much do you want to bet that this administration hasn't created enough jobs to be out of a 4 year record of JOB LOSS?

[LostInAnomie]

2. No duh!

This would have to be the more successful month of job creation ever to pull * out of that hole.

[LittleClarkie]

3. How are they gonna spin it this time?

That anemic numbers are really good as long as they are in the plus side?

Or will they have manipulated the job numbers like last time. Adjusted down one month, adjusted up the next.

[rurallib]

4. My guess

Big numbers so chimpy looks good tomorrow. Then it will be revised downward in November and not be reported. April - July have all been revised down.

[marigold20]

5. CNBC has the numbers early - around 7:30 a.m. CDT

I saw them when the 36,000 figure was announced this summer - I thought the announcers were going to slit their wrists on camera. They had been bragging about the recovery until then.

[helpisontheway]

6. Some guy on HARDBALL seemed

confident that the numbers would be good.He was guessing a total of 200,000 gained(said 150,000 new jobs plus the previous months would be bumped up) and the % unemployed dropping.

[Thrill]

7. Suppose to be good news for chimpy

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6193405/

[Hot Water]

8. If

the number tomorrow is less than 1.6 million, he's the first president in 72 years to not create a single job.

ROLF. And so is my dog.

[Dookus]

9. yeah

from what the Republicans are saying, I guess it's gonna be over 150,000 jobs. Not great, but they're setting expectations there. If it's 200k, they'll gloat. Less than 150k, they're in a world of hurt.

Given the number of times Repubs have repeated those numbers today, I'd guess that there's been some leaks.

[Blue_Roses]

10. there is just no way that there have 200,000 jobs created in sept

if they show tht then we know they have been out and out fudged. However, I won't be surprised