Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the GOP defense of the 2000 Florida heavily black voter purge?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:35 PM
Original message
What is the GOP defense of the 2000 Florida heavily black voter purge?
I have actually never heard a response to this charge from the other side.

Is there one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like an answer to that question....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. "It's a Democrat lie"?
I mean the media doesn't report it, and most repubs I talk to don't think it happened.

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. criminals
The only thing I've heard on that is that they purged criminals... of course, maybe they did purge a few criminals, but out of how many actually purged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Something like 90 thousand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Purge?
Purge, purge you say?
What purge is that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluzmann57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well it has to be Clinton's fault
Edited on Sun Jan-11-04 03:42 PM by Bluzmann57
I mean everything else is. This is a story that needed a lot of pub, but will rarely see daylight anymore. After all, Kobe Bryant, Britney Spears, Michael Jackson, Scott Peterson aren't involved in it. Only the whole damn country, so what does it matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Essentially, it can be summed up in one word:
"Oops". :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Well the NAACP sued, and the state of Fla. settled....
the media damn well should be reporting this story....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. A consent decree, defined:
"We did nothing wrong and we promise never to do nothing wrong again".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. that's how it ended?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Essentially
There was a lot of legal gobbledygook involved, of course, but that was the bottom line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The NAACP should have kept the heat on them...that's a lame outcome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yeah, well, consider the court system.
The same folks who selected GWB would have eventually ruled on any lawsuit, so it was probably the best that could be had, under the circumstances... :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. and the state agreed to have the problem corrected... AFTER the 2002
elections (in time for Jeb!) Would be curious to see if there is any press checking to see if this has been corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yes, God spoke to them.
He said GWB must lead my chosen nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Who Cares?
There is not a blessed thing on the face of this earth we can do about the purged lists now and that is not what is important.

What is important is this. Have those people who were purged since reregistered or found their names back on the roles by some other means?

That is what counts, because you may rest assured that those who have been denied the vote will be at the polls next time, its just a question if they will be denied again.

Thom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I know the Sharpton campaign...
... has been HEAVILY involved in registering and RE-registering in Florida (and elsewhere), and that they use the 'purged list' as one reference tool. We all owe Al for that, if nothing else.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. The Illegally-Disenfrancised Voters Stay Disenfranchised Until 2006
from what I read. It was "too hard" to get them back on the rolls in time for this year's elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. that was the excuse in the 2002 elections... it was to be corrected
before the next elections after 2002 (eg 2004). Since I believe that was part of the court order. If you have read that they are stalling - can you remember where you saw this - it should be pushed. Start framing it as a Civil Rights Act violation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. how I would fix the problem
I would have black voters at the polls accompanied by ARMED escorts provided by civil rights organizations on election day 2004. These conservatives need to be shown that liberals are not afraid of using force if necesssary to defend their freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. Silence.
The same as the corporate media's response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xrepub Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
15. What actually happened
Florida passed a law saying that the voter registration list should be purged of those who did not have a right to vote.

They hired a company (with connections to Jeb) who agreed to get them a list of felons to remove.

Among other things, this company sent them a list of 10,000 people who were arrested for misdemeaners in Texas. THey removed anyone who had the same name and birthdate as anyone on this list.

They received a list of released felons from several other states who had the right to vote in those states. THey removed anyone who had the same name and birthdate as anyone on this list.

Thus they illegally revoked the right to vote of these people.

There is more, but this indicates enough.

Black people are overly represented as felons, and as misdemeaner committers in Texas. THus Florida was able to remove a large number of people who would vote against Dubya from the voting roles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. great summary of the crime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC