Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Heathers Against Howard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:34 PM
Original message
Heathers Against Howard
Short but amusing...

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/dean/articles/2004/01/11/heathers_against_howard/

Heathers against Howard
By Joshua Glenn
Globe Staff, 1/11/2004

WHEN A REGULAR at Dean Nation, the oldest and most popular Howard Dean weblog, complained recently about Dean-bashing by liberal pundits Joshua Micah Marshall, Matthew Yglesias, and George Stephanopoulos, among others, he caused the digital equivalent of a firestorm by concluding, "All you Heathers, get out of town." Yglesias, writing on his own blog, claimed to welcome the moniker. But many Democrats online claim that the "Deaniacs" have gone too far this time.

The term "Heather" is apparently derived from the 1989 movie of that title starring Winona Ryder as a high-schooler oppressed by a clique of alpha females, all named Heather. In 2003, along with the more descriptive "Beltway Heathers," the term was frequently used online -- by the popular political blogger Atrios and Slate.com's Mickey Kaus, for example -- to castigate members of the Washington press corps, not for being anti-Dean but for being cliquish. What Heathers have in common, according to one Dean Nation visitor, "is a self-serving, careerist conviction that it's uncool to be too liberal or too Democratic."

...more, but only one paragraph...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Alas, Babylon ...
Well, I don't think it's that bad.

You know, I wouldn't have a bit of trouble supporting any of the Magnificent Nine. (OK, maybe Lieberman, but Joe, too, has managed to tear Bush a few new orifices over the past year.)

Most voters are not going to vote based on "Heatherological" forces. They'll vote vis-a-vis Our Wise and Courageous Commander, Maximum Christian Bush. I think that's the real dynamic -- and that the in-fighting among Democrats is a side-issue that will probably be forgotten by the time the Easter Bunny does his Pagan egg-thing in celebration of the Resurrection of Our Lord.

We Americans are a schiozid bunch in both religion and politics. Thankfully, we're monotheistic -- at least, we follow the rule of One God Per Political Party.

--bkl
F**k me gently with a chainsaw!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is even more fitting given this
MR. BRODER: I saw the same kind of contrast when I was out there earlier this week. Gephardt gave a pep talk to about 175 union business agents and staff people who’d come in from around the country. I’d say it was about 98 percent male and the median size of these guys, about 6’3”, 250 pounds. Then I went over to...

MR. RUSSERT: My kind of guy.

MR. BRODER: Then I went over to the Dean headquarters, they’re young, they’re female, they’re gay, and they’re small. And I thought to myself, I hope those Gephardt guys don’t run into the Dean people. You know it would be a bad scene.

The above is from MTP today.

One of murders in the movie was of a couple of guys who humilated the main character by making him say he was gay and ask to suck dick in front of a group of guys. The anti gay bigotry by head Heather Broder fits all to well in this analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-bush Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Geez.
Broder was not being anti-gay. He said that there were gays that were supporting Dean. He said there were females supporting Dean. He said there were young people supporting Dean. He said there were small people (comparing them to the larger Labor Union folks like Gephardts supporters) supporting Dean.

Where is the anti-gay bigotry/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You are joking, right?
Alluding to violence if the "small, queer, female, sandal-wearing, latte-drinking, Volvo driving Dean supporters" cross paths with "Russert's kind of men, 6'5" bear-men"? Ok, sure.

Come on, Russert and Broder are jackasses, and it's irresponsible to consider them "journalists" in any way. When do we get to put these sons a bitches on trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-bush Donating Member (397 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. No, I'm not
If you actually had WATCHED this, as I did, you would probably realize what I am saying. "Small", "Gay", "Female" were not all adjectives describing ONE person. It was obvious by his voice inflection that he was talking about a group consisting of Females, Gays, and Smaller People. The smaller was in response to a comment that Gephardt's supporters tended to be large burly men who are generally in a labor (machinery, industrial, farming) type job.


After the comparisons were done, they asked if there was going to be any physical intimidation going on in the caucuses, and they were joking about it. They were not serious at all.

People are making a big deal out of absolutely nothing here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Gotta admit I'm getting a kick out of their continuing astonishment
Should the Wanshington Press Corp be made to eat a shoe cake if Dean wins? I pitch in to have it baked (or cook their goose).


Images from Dean Rocks the House of Blues, Hollywood
From wtmusic http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=919849
From Joefree1 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=921300


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. "liberal pundits...George Stephanopoulos" Bwhahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. I can't figure out just who the vicitm is supposed to be in this story
Dean? Or the "Heathers"?


looks like a slow newsday at the Boston Globe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. bwahahahaha "The DC Heathers"
remove the references to Dean... apply it to all the chasing after whitewater innuendo and Clinton Bashing in the media... apply it to the dc beltway media talking heads tendency to talk about democratic candidate's clothes and hair and avoidance of policy talk - while rarely discussing anything negative about the GOP... or about a cbs morning piece I saw yesterday about the "Great Economic News on JObs" I heard that went on and on... but didn't mention that there was only a net of 1,000 jobs... and with no mention of how many jobs have been lost under bush and how many net-new jobs would have to be added - just to regain all of the jobs lost...

I think the DC Heathers... cliqueish and superficial... is a great term for the current cache of DC media pundits! Place a figure like Candi Crowley or Cici (whatever her last name is from wapo) and bingo... demonstrates the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Gene Lyons Recently Used the Term
"The point is that Dean didn’t merely insist upon the folly of invading Iraq, he’s still holding firm. His apostasy recently drew a stern rebuke in a Washington Post editorial tellingly titled, "Beyond the Mainstream." Only Dean, the newspaper complained, "omitted democracy from his goals for Iraq and the Middle East." And only Mr. Dean made the extraordinary argument that the capture for talking back to Washington’s insufferable punditocracy. (Reporters are leery of Dean, the Post’s Howard Kurtz writes, because he never asks personal questions about them.) Resentment of the capital’s self-important" Heathers "(from the film satirizing high school cliques) runs strong on Democrat-oriented Web sites."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. amusing...hey Will???
OT but am curious

Josh had a blurb on his blog about ARG NH Poll posting something about senior voter intimidation;

"Over the past 2 days of calling, a number of older respondents registered as undeclared voters have reported that they have received telephone calls from a campaign informing them that they will not be allowed to vote in the Democratic primary because they missed the deadline to switch parties. A respondent discovered, however, that when she told the caller that she was thinking about voting for Howard Dean, the caller told her that she would be eligible to vote.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/

I wrote to Josh but his email was overloaded

Heard anything??


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. New to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. hopefully the truth will out n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. you sound like you are salivating for some dirt.
I am sure your "above it all" candidate would approve. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windansea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. believe me
if my candidate or ANY candidate is intimidating senior voters I will condemn it.

I don't like puke style politics

sorry Will don't mean to hijack your thread!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-11-04 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
15. well, fuck me gently with a chainsaw
If you want to fuck with the eagles, you better learn to fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC