life_long_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:01 PM
Original message |
Olberman is on now. Going to talk about the box on Bush's back |
nostalgicaboutmyfutr
(991 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. info....when available... eom |
life_long_dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
it is a strong backbone, and that is all. Now we know he is lying, worms dont have backbones.
|
ibegurpard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The American people need the answers to these questions... |
|
...raised by the mysterious bulge and the strange comments to no one at particular during the last debate.
|
Mojambo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. I don't know about pursuing this story |
|
If the media wants to poke around at it fine but Democrats shouldn't go ANYWHERE near this story.
It's just simply impossible to prove anything.
|
ibegurpard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
the speculation that throws the Bush campaign off their stride is up to us.
|
liveoaktx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
4. LOL! Tucker Eskew says it's a strong backbone |
|
More like a lump to match Laura
|
Gabi Hayes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. olbermann ANSWERED the question himself! WTF????? |
|
he mentioned the protective device FOR Eskew, who did NOT explain what was there, completely letting him off the hook!
EXTREMELY disappointing
|
cheshire
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. Eskew lies as easily as the rest of them. A strong back is not lumpy. |
bear425
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Tucker Eskew said it was nothing but *'s strong backbone...
|
Shopaholic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
didn't really answer the question, now did he?????
|
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
6. It'll probably turn out to be bad tailoring |
|
But it'll be interesting to see what the experts think. More than one thinks that it's an earpiece receiver or something.
|
GimmeDANEger
(505 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Did Tucker know that question was going to be asked? |
|
seemed kinda off guard...
|
Alenne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I could have done without that segment |
|
They asked a Bush campaign spokesman if Bush wore an ear piece like he was going to tell us if Bush did. The guy didn't even have to answer the question because Olberman answered for him. What was the point in doing that segment?
|
maine_raptor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Backbone???? Ok, my next question is |
|
"who's" or better yet, "what's" backbone, cause if it's George's, it's out of place.
|
tomfodw
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Keith flubbed this one. It's clearly not any part of Bush's spine poking through his jacket (unless he's as misshapen physically as he is morally and intellectually). Olberman shouldn't have let Askew get away with that.
|
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-04 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Why would anyone believe what that lying worm |
|
Tucker Eskew has to say?
"Strong backbone" my ass...he just dodged the question.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |